David Lambert
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Messages
- 11,377
The thinpacks meet this criterion quite nicely.
I agree that if they are like the empty thin cases I've bought for my DVD-R's, they are quite functional and protective as well as saving a lot of space. I just wish we had one standard.
With over 800 DVD's and no room left for storage, I've just recently converted my entire collection to thinpaks. It was just a matter of trimming 3/16th of an inch off each side of the original cover.Nathan, I think a little bit of math might convince people here. Can you figure out how many more "thin" DVD's can fit in the same space as your 800 "regular" case DVD's. I'm sure the difference will be dramatic!
I'm at the point where I'm stacking DVD's in front of other DVD's to be able to fit them on my shelf and I don't like it at all. I'd LOVE to have smaller packaging.
I'm laughing at this one. With over 800 DVD's and no room left for storage, I've just recently converted my entire collection to thinpaks. It was just a matter of trimming 3/16th of an inch off each side of the original cover. The biggest problem was making color copies of all the snapper cases at Kinko's. (It wasn't exactly cheap, though).I am all for thin cases but I was afraid of this difference in cover art size. Why didn't they just make the darn case 3/16 of an inch deeper (not thicker, but deeper) so that the old covers could fit perfectly? That really bites that they aren't easily swappable.