David Lambert
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Messages
- 11,377
Moreover, there is a truth that most DVD fanatics are unwilling to speak — that a properly panned and scanned 1.85:1 movie that was shot in recent times loses very little of its original picture.
I'm gonna hafta call bullshit here. 33 - 40% isn't exactly little.
------------------
My DVD Collection Casa del Clint
[Edited last by Clinton on November 07, 2001 at 09:06 AM]
As with Warner right now, I have yet in my area to find the widescreen edition of CATS AND DOGS. A movie that I would buy if available. I am choosing not to purchase on line siince I am trying to be credit card free.
I finally got mine at Best Buy yesterday, after getting an e-mail from a BB customer rep who asked a buyer. Buyer said it should be in all stores as of yesterday, 11/th.
Unfortunately, he's also sure that Wonka WS won't be in BB stores until 2-3 weeks after it's street date of 11/13!!
------------------
DAVE/Memphis
MORE TV ON DVD, PLEASE!
Do you like TV on DVD? Then check THIS out!
.....http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/.....
I think this shows that this debate has started to become coarse. The truth is that DVD is now becoming a mainstream medium, and the people who originally embraced it, the true videophiles, will soon be in the minority. What that means is that studios are going to start increasing their output of pan-and-scan copies of movies. And that should be alright with us...
...Moreover, there is a truth that most DVD fanatics are unwilling to speak — that a properly panned and scanned 1.85:1 movie that was shot in recent times loses very little of its original picture. I've done this comparison many times...I certainly can't quibble with someone who wants their screen filled up, at the expense of very little picture (or in the case of open-matte transfers, which adds information to the top and bottom of the screen).
We will have to accept that studios will be increasing their P&S output in the coming months and years...the studios...understand that there will always be a small but fanatic market for OAR...
...I feel bad for N.G.'s niece — she probably couldn't care less about OAR, but loses out on a gift because of her uncle's obsession.
- NOTHING about non-OAR films on DVD should be "all right with us"
- We don't "have to accept" anything, much less that "studios will be increasing their P&S output"
- If "this debate has started to become coarse", it's only in the eyes of folks like the composer of this note, who seems to be willing to give up the OAR battle he otherwise indicates he believes in (or so he says in other parts of his note)
- I, too, must call bullshit on the comment that "Moreover, there is a truth that most DVD fanatics are unwilling to speak — that a properly panned and scanned 1.85:1 movie that was shot in recent times loses very little of its original picture".
- This comment is misleading as well: "in the case of open-matte transfers, which adds information to the top and bottom of the screen". I've shown the A Fish Called Wanda and Willie Wonka examples a few time already, and won't repeat them here. The "info" added is BAD info in most cases!
- As for "she probably couldn't care less about OAR, but loses out on a gift because of her uncle's obsession", well it is his right to support or not support ANY purchase because it interferes with his beliefs, no matter WHAT they are. Should he buy his niece makeup tested on animals so she won't be disappointed by not getting the brand name she wanted? N.G. feels like most of us do: NO OAR = NO SALE. If we support MAR releases AT ALL, even as gifts for special occassions, that sends the message to the studios that we're not really serious here. I don't know about you guys, but I'm serious. Serious to the point of hyperbole. [/list=a]
By the way John and Duncan: I understand that you disagreed with my subject line. I agree with your criticism of it. But - and this is especially aimed at John - you did NOT have to be insulting in the process of leveling your criticism. A more diplomatic approach is okay, y'know? Especially in the face of an "angry young man" like myself (is 36 years old still qualifying for AYM status? Cool...).
------------------
DAVE/Memphis
MORE TV ON DVD, PLEASE!
Do you like TV on DVD? Then check THIS out!
.....http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/.....
A lot of P&Sr's are complaining about black bars on Dvd's
I really don't think there's that much complaining. When NBC ran their experiment showing ER in widescreen, there was no noticeable affect on the ratings. That's why they decided to keep the widescreen permanently. And now NBC broadcasts several more shows in widescreen and they showed Uprising OAR as well. The West Wing's ratings this year are higher if anything since they've gone to widescreen. It's a small group complaining but they aren't being heard for the most part. Widescreen is becoming more prevalent on TV and it's certainly not going anywhere on DVD. Perhaps we'll see more P&S discs available but it won't be at the expense of widescreen. And with each TV show that goes to widescreen, the public will learn more about it and why it's the right way to exhbit these films and shows.
He actually sees it as something special that's on instead of regular TV. It's a movie.
Thanks, Joel. That quote made my day!
Rob
------------------
"That suits me down to the ground."