DVD File's Review Makes it seem its no big Deal that it's MAR

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Dave Scarpa, May 29, 2002.

  1. Dave Scarpa

    Dave Scarpa Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 1999
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    David Scarpa
    I don't understand this site's layed back approach to studio's releasing films MAR'd. They did the same thing with SNOW DOGS, hey P&S no big deal it's a pretty decent transfer anyhow. They take the same atitude with MIDNIGHT CLEAR. Hey they say you're getting more info on the top and bottom anyhow. Well this title will look like crap on my Widescreen set's Stretch mode or with Borders on both side, Hell I'd rather have a non anamorphic WS presentation. It does'nt matter since I won't be buying it, but c'mon DVD FILE MAR is not alright !
     
  2. DaViD Boulet

    DaViD Boulet Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,800
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Agreed. Read the review here:
    http://www.dvdfile.com/software/revi...ightclear.html
    With Snow Dogs they seemed to be more critical but this review almost sounds like an endorsement.
    What's going on? I've emailed them ([email protected]) time and time again about things like this and I NEVER get a response. If others out there feel strongly that the site is starting to loose its purist HT values and it bothers you please write a polite but clear email to dvdfile.com. It's a great site and it's a shame that they seem to take little or no interest in helping this cause.
    They completely ignored my requests that they post the Disney phone/email info on their site informing consumers to contact Disney to express concerns about P/S only discs. Now they seem to be extending this same strange grace to Columbia as well.
    Is it really *that* important to get pre-release DVDs to review from these studios that it's worth compromising the very basic of HT principles like OAR???
     
  3. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,998
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I, too, am disappointed about "A Midnight Clear", but there's a very big difference between an open-matte presentation of this film (or any film shot flat) and a panned-and-scanned presentation of a 'scope film. But DVD File clearly notes this as problematic, laments it, but doesn't suggest it's ruination on-par with something like a P&S version of "Ben Hur".

    Though I don't believe this is the case here, I would certainly understand if Keith Gordon preferred an open-matte transfer a la Stanley Kubrick. In some instances, the "shot-for-the-box" (aka "shot-to-protect") version is closer to the director's intentions and the matted 1.85:1 version is more like a "formatted to fit your theater screen" since nearly every multiplex practices common projection and would simply soft-matte it to 1.85:1 anyway.

    These things are not always so simple, and I think DVD FILE is taking the more sophisticated approach by noting and criticizing the fact that this was not how the film was presented in theaters, but not engaging in more virulent and vitriolic condemnation.
     
  4. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well said, Rich [​IMG]
     
  5. John Berggren

    John Berggren Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 1999
    Messages:
    3,238
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think that DVDFile is getting away from being an OAR supporter, and just being a DVD site. I can't imagine the reasoning behind this. More advertising dollars from Disney perhaps?

    I find it unfortunate. I still use DVDFile for my DVD announcements, but I'm growing tired of their complacency with MAR.
     
  6. Randy A Salas

    Randy A Salas Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since the director played such a big part in the production of the A Midnight Clear DVD, one would have to think that its open-matte presentation is of his choosing. Er, right?
     
  7. DaViD Boulet

    DaViD Boulet Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,800
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rich,
    good points. But still these points remain:
    1. the sides *are* cropped (in addition to the added vertical info), albeit less severely than a P/S of an anamorphic 2.35:1 scope film. And as with all "open matte" presentations, special effects sequences will be true P/S. You can't just "zoom" this on your 16x9 TV and restore a theatrical presentation.
    2. this is not a director's preference like with Kubrick who apparently did view the theatrical framing as a compromise and the 1.33:1 framming as his true vision. This is a case of a studio modifying the aspect ratio for walmart shoppers.
    3. Say goodbye to 33% of your resolution of the OAR presentation vs a 16x9 discs. You could "zoom" this disc on a 16x9 display, but you've lost resolution and remember, you still have those sides cropped.
    4. Why oh Why can't Columbia provide *both* viewing options when they feel that walmart shoppers would prefer 4x3? The problem here isn't about *including* an open-matte/P/S option, but rather about *exluding* an 16x9 WS OAR option.
    Bottom line. It's wrong. This isn't about DVD file needing to crusade like some passionate avenger for OAR. DVDfile seemes to give only a cursory mention to the lack of OAR but all things being equal seems to recommend this disc.
    The danger here isn't a single case of DVD file being "sophisticated" about open-matte presentations (Open Matte presentations have been discussed on this forum at nausium...and the consensus is that HT enthusiasts still want the director's theatrical vision). The danger here is the beginning of a trend; that a site that was once advocating for the HT community's interests is now seeming to adapt to the growing audience of viewers who want their 4x3 TVs filled with picture and don't regard a film's original aspect ratio as an element of artistic integrity that should not be compromised by a studio's marketing department.
     
  8. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  9. Malcolm R

    Malcolm R Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    13,238
    Likes Received:
    898
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    The Kubrick framing issue is common knowledge. Many, many threads have exhaustively covered it. Search function is available.
    If studios and some websites are now trumpeting that "open matte" is not all that bad, whey don't they go all the way and open the whole widescreen image? Then we'd still get the full WS version (which I'm assuming could be machine cropped at top/bottom for 16:9 monitors) and J6P would still have a full screen.
    Then for everyone who likes to say, "Hey, you get more picture with open matte!" there would be even more of a good thing. [​IMG]
     
  10. Damin J Toell

    Damin J Toell Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2001
    Messages:
    3,762
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Real Name:
    Damin J. Toell
     
  11. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,998
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  12. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  13. Dave Scarpa

    Dave Scarpa Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 1999
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    David Scarpa
    My take although I have no inside info is that columbia probably asked Gordon to Record a commentary and that was the end of it, they then decided not to spend the money to create an anamorphic master, and they plopped the commentary on the disk, I'd be interested to hear from anyone that get's the disk if Gordon alludes to the Aspect ratio in the commentary. And even if he decides to release this Open Matte I still disagree with it. I want the presentation as it was in theaters, and if that's matted to 1.85 then so be it. Columbia has in the past put both versions on a single disk and there is no reason not to.
     
  14. Ted Todorov

    Ted Todorov Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2000
    Messages:
    2,981
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
     
  15. DaViD Boulet

    DaViD Boulet Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,800
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As far as Director approved P/S, I think the given should be to assume that most directors would want the artistry of the framing of their films preserved on DVD all things being equal. If evidence is provided to the contrary in this case, I'll remove that point from my list. But in the absence of evidence either way I don't feel that one needs to prove a director wanted OAR to cite the alteration in image framing as a compromise of the artistry of the image composition.

    Granted DVD file does admonish the overall presentation for film fans in the closing remarks. Oddly, I don't remember reading this when I first read the review...and I read the closing remarks twice to be sure bcs I didn't want to get the intent wrongly. Must have been blind!

    All told, the closing remarks of this review do put back the "perspective" with which I'm comfortable.

    -dave
     
  16. Damin J Toell

    Damin J Toell Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2001
    Messages:
    3,762
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Real Name:
    Damin J. Toell
     
  17. DaViD Boulet

    DaViD Boulet Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,800
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  18. Justin Lane

    Justin Lane Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2000
    Messages:
    2,149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  19. DaViD Boulet

    DaViD Boulet Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,800
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  20. Lyle_JP

    Lyle_JP Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2000
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
     

Share This Page