What's new

DVD 2900 worthy upgrade from 1600? (1 Viewer)

Travis

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
258
I currently have the DVD1600, which I lucked out and happened to pick up the last one at my local B&M, and while I love it I am looking to upgrade mainly because of SACD. My 1600 plays DVDA but no SACD and they have some titles that aren't available on DVDA. Is this a worthy upgrade worth the extra cost? Is the DVD picture quality much better? I have a tough time justifying spending more money for a DVD player (5900, hence the reason for sticking with 2900) than I did for my receiver (3805). Any input is appreciated.
 

Brian L

Premium
Joined
Jul 8, 1998
Messages
3,185
I hope this link works, as it gives the Secrets scores and reviews for all Denon machines:

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cgi-b...deInt=0&mpeg=0

The 1600 scores exactly 1 point higher than the 2900, but there are key differences that the review will show you.

One thing that you probably already know is that the 1600, while a killer machine in terms of PQ, is somewhat lacking in its layer change. The 2900 is essentially prefect on that score. That can be a real fork in the eye, and is the only really shortcoming I have issues with on my 1600.

And obviously, you would be gaining SACD capability.

BGL
 

Travis

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
258
According to the secrets review the 1600 has better pq than the 2900. My TV is a Hitachi 57s500. They say that is fails the chroma and 3-2 alt. Is this going to be very evident. I would hate to sell my 1600 and get something for more money with less pq.
 

Brian L

Premium
Joined
Jul 8, 1998
Messages
3,185
I think one of the big things that lets the 2900 down is it has a flavor of the Chorma Bug, but it is only apparent with certain content.

The scores are weighted such that doing poorly on certain things will hurt more than on others.

I do wish my 1600 had the layer change of the 2900.

BGL
 

Mark Broyles

Auditioning
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
3
I recently upgraded my 1600 to the 2900 along with the 3805 receiver. The three visual improvements I noticed were: no layer change whatsoever, better transparency on foggy or dusty scenes and less blurring on flesh tones in motion. I received a good deal on a demo unit so for me the decision was easier. Also the LED panel shows more information which I like but some may find distracting. To me it solved some nagging issues on the video end. Not night and day, but I'm happy with the decision.:emoji_thumbsup:
 

JeremySt

Screenwriter
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
1,771
Real Name
Jeremy


No. The 2900 has all around better PQ, it only recieved a lower score b/c of the chroma bug issue, which is only a problem a select few discs. On any properly authored film based DVDs, the 2900 is clearly superior. The 1600 has no chroma bug isssues, but on every other aspect of PQ, the 2900 wins. On 98% of the DVDs you watch, the 2900 is better than the 1600.

The 1600 is no slouch, and has great PQ. It does have shortcomings, just like the 2900, but the shortcomings of the 2900 hurt its overall score a little more.
 

Don_Berg

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
931
The Secrets experts state that the Silicon Image de-interlacer (used in the DVD-2900) is a little better with film-based material than the Faroudja (used in the DVD-1600) while video-based material is better with the Faroudja. Both are excellent models.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

Threads
348,756
Messages
4,855,661
Members
142,373
Latest member
davido626
Recent bookmarks
0
Top