Nils Luehrmann
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2001
- Messages
- 3,513
What if ten years ago there were two competing formats for DVD (not including DIVX), one that only had DVD-5 finalized in the specs (and for sake of argument, no way of ever supporting DVD-9, while the other format did include support for DVD-9 (dual-layer).
Now let’s say that upon release, only DVD-5 discs were being pressed. One could have argued that what's the point in spending more for a format that currently only provides the same level of capacity as the other. Obviously, history has shown that dual-layer DVDs have been a necessary component for higher quality releases without splitting a film onto two discs.
History has also shown that given more capacity and more bandwidth, software designers will find a way to use it all up in order to make products that are better or more appealing to consumers in order to gain more market share.
I do not see why the same will not be true for Blu-ray.
Now let’s say that upon release, only DVD-5 discs were being pressed. One could have argued that what's the point in spending more for a format that currently only provides the same level of capacity as the other. Obviously, history has shown that dual-layer DVDs have been a necessary component for higher quality releases without splitting a film onto two discs.
History has also shown that given more capacity and more bandwidth, software designers will find a way to use it all up in order to make products that are better or more appealing to consumers in order to gain more market share.
I do not see why the same will not be true for Blu-ray.