Discussion on Rons review of Philips DVD recorder

A week or so ago I thought I remembered seeing something about winning one of these beauties. Did someone already win one, or was that contest still upcoming?
Ron: In the review, you compared DVD+RW disks to a CD-RW. Is that correct, or did you mean a DVD-RW? I hope you mean the latter, as comparing any DVD format with a CD format doesn't make sense.

 

Ron,
I borrowed a Panasonic DVD-R recorder a while back to make personal DVD copies of laserdiscs that I already own, and I have found the compatibility of DVD-R to be absolutely fantastic, even with older recorders that I have used.
I remember how you used to brag that you sold all of your laserdiscs to finance your initial DVD collection.
I certainly hope you are not making personal DVD copies of borrowed laserdiscs that you do not own.

 

Ron,
I am curious as to why you hooked up your laserdisc player to the recorder via a S-Video cable instead of a composite cable? The general consensus from the thread I started on this topic was to hook it up via a composite cable, as the comb filters in laserdisc players are sub-par...

 

Lane, I don't know about the Philips, but the comb filter in the Pansonic DMR-E20 recorder is a fantastic 3D Y/C circuit.
The only way I'd consider hooking up an LD player to the Panasonic via s-video would be if the player was a CLD-99 or one of the recent import exotic models.

 

Michael, I would have to agree with your comment about the comb filter in the Pansonic DMR-E20. But I would expect the same quality comb filter in the Philips unit, this is why I wonder why Ron hooked it up via S-Video - unless the LD player they used was a CLD-99 or LD-S9...

 

Go Panny. I own the DMR-E20 & love its recordings. The E30 is due out soon. Having read Sound & Vision's tests & those of techie members at avsforum, the Philips' picture quality is just not good as the Panny's or Pioneer's DVD recorders.

 

well damn...if that don't make you want to go right out and buy one!
Is this model vastly different than the Panasonic models? Having found them for around $550 right now...i was thinking of buying.
I know that a friend made copies of the Indiana Jones movies on DVD-R for me and i could definitely notice the difference between the lasers and the dvd.
Am i losing it?

 

Do either the Panasonic or Pioneer have a coax or optical input or is this something that manufacturers aren't allowed to include? (copy protection)

If I was to record my SW THX laserdiscs I would want to get the PCM track. Is this possible or am I stuck with analog?

A new DVD player was on my upgrade list and I had budgeted $800-1000 for it. I may have to pick up the Philips recorder instead.

Sorry if the questions are a bit stupid. I'm new to the digital recording part of HT.

 

Ron,

Does this player exhibit the chroma bug problem. Also could you tell much of a differnce between HQ and SP recordings. Thanks for the review. Was looking into purchasing this player and the review helps.

 

I find the lack of digital audio inputs disturbing. What good is a digital recording format if you have to use analog audio. Seems like the technology is half ass'ed.

What I would like to do is use my HTPC in conjunction with dScaler to record the Star Wars Trilogy in 16x9 anamorphic onto DVD. But if I were to do this, I would be losing my 5.1 DD and it would actualy degrade the video image from a pristine 1440x960i down to 480p.

I guess those out there with Home Theater PC's may never have a use for such a device. Even though it's tempting...

It's too bad it doesn't do 1080i. For that, I could forgive the lack of digital audio.

 

Because there are no digital inputs, this means this recorder can not be used to bootleg DVD's right?

I'm glad that it doesn't. I for one would be upset after spending all of this money on DVD's to only have a cheap alternative available.

 

FYI: There are already cheap alternatives, but we won't go into that here.
However if that makes you upset, wait till they start releasing all your favorite films on some new and improved high definition format... making all your current movies seem obsolete.
BTW, what about the giveaway? Did I imagine that, or was that just refering to the Phillips link that the whole world can enter?

 

I personally don't see the need to support DVDs into it's recording at this time. I personally would rather buy the official studio release. Where this potentially becomes a big problem is with the advent of HD-DVD. My main purpose for buying this is for making DVDs of LDs that won't have much of a chance of being on DVD. The fact is, there are only a handful of titles at this point that won't make it to DVD. My reason for buying this is cable TV recording. If my comments above ventured too far into the wrong territory, just delete the offending statements.

Ron, my question is you mentioned recording the LD in the Standard Play mode. This was said to give DVD quality results. Did you try recording anything in the High Quality mode, and if so, what were your results. I'm assuming the HQ mode is for recording sources with a resolution higher than DVD.