DanG
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2000
- Messages
- 140
Well I got the Die Hard Ultimate Collection (Box Set), DTS-THX and finally Anamorphically Enhanced for Widescreen.
As we all know a non-anamorphic letterbox presentation at 2.35:1 aspect ratio constitutes about 270 lines on the DVD and the same presentation in anamorphic enhanced uses around 360 lines. So the anam version should be a little more detailed that a non-anam version.
Popped in Die Hard N-A version and skipped to Chap.2 where a driver is holding up a sign "Al.D.Simpson". I had company over so we watched a few minutes after to that to get a feel for the N-A version.
Up next, pop in the A-E version and skip to Chap.2 and the scene isn't there. Fox has re-edited the chapter starts. Found scene halfway through Chap.3. Found the "Al.D.Simpson" sign and it looked exactly the same as the N-A version. Watched the next few minutes and everybody agreed we couldn't tell the difference between the A-E and the scaled N-A version.
My only conclusion is, not that the RP91 is that good, but rather, that FOX instead of spending a little money to Telecine a new anamorphic master tape used an existing non-anamorphic master tape and scaled it to 363 lines to make the DVD mother. Doesn't FOX studios own the interpositive prints so that they could have made an anamorphic master tape?
Now I have to figure out if there is a legitimate way I can take the set back as the only difference between it and my old one is the DTS. I think I'm burned. Does what FOX did here constitute fraud?
Had an opportunity to compare Gladiator tonight, RP91 DVD vs. HD presentation at rescaled to 1.78:1 aspect ratio. Very disappointed that TMN got their hands on a rescaled version. I saw a quote from Dreamworks that the copies they released for broadcast were 2.35:1.
Even though it was a rescaled version, the HD presentation had more resolution than the DVD. Colours seemed to be richer and there were more shadings. Buffed vs. coarse parts of leather uniforms showed up more clearly in HD and facial blemishes and pores were clearly more evident in HD.
------------------
As we all know a non-anamorphic letterbox presentation at 2.35:1 aspect ratio constitutes about 270 lines on the DVD and the same presentation in anamorphic enhanced uses around 360 lines. So the anam version should be a little more detailed that a non-anam version.
Popped in Die Hard N-A version and skipped to Chap.2 where a driver is holding up a sign "Al.D.Simpson". I had company over so we watched a few minutes after to that to get a feel for the N-A version.
Up next, pop in the A-E version and skip to Chap.2 and the scene isn't there. Fox has re-edited the chapter starts. Found scene halfway through Chap.3. Found the "Al.D.Simpson" sign and it looked exactly the same as the N-A version. Watched the next few minutes and everybody agreed we couldn't tell the difference between the A-E and the scaled N-A version.
My only conclusion is, not that the RP91 is that good, but rather, that FOX instead of spending a little money to Telecine a new anamorphic master tape used an existing non-anamorphic master tape and scaled it to 363 lines to make the DVD mother. Doesn't FOX studios own the interpositive prints so that they could have made an anamorphic master tape?
Now I have to figure out if there is a legitimate way I can take the set back as the only difference between it and my old one is the DTS. I think I'm burned. Does what FOX did here constitute fraud?
Had an opportunity to compare Gladiator tonight, RP91 DVD vs. HD presentation at rescaled to 1.78:1 aspect ratio. Very disappointed that TMN got their hands on a rescaled version. I saw a quote from Dreamworks that the copies they released for broadcast were 2.35:1.
Even though it was a rescaled version, the HD presentation had more resolution than the DVD. Colours seemed to be richer and there were more shadings. Buffed vs. coarse parts of leather uniforms showed up more clearly in HD and facial blemishes and pores were clearly more evident in HD.
------------------