- Joined
- Jan 6, 1999
- Messages
- 3,297
- Real Name
- Mark
Regarding the aspect ratio,
I think I have to go with director's intentions,
unless s/he is in conflict with the cinematographer,
unless the director has stupid reasons for wanting
1.33:1 that have nothing to do with maintaining
the artistic integrity of the film.
(My mind harkens back to when Cameron didn't
want The Abyss presented widescreen
because people's TVs were generally too small.
That is a poor excuse to butcher the framing
of a film. It isn't a good excuse for consumers,
and certainly isn't for a director.)
Mark
I think I have to go with director's intentions,
unless s/he is in conflict with the cinematographer,
unless the director has stupid reasons for wanting
1.33:1 that have nothing to do with maintaining
the artistic integrity of the film.
(My mind harkens back to when Cameron didn't
want The Abyss presented widescreen
because people's TVs were generally too small.
That is a poor excuse to butcher the framing
of a film. It isn't a good excuse for consumers,
and certainly isn't for a director.)
Mark