SeanSKA
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 269
- Real Name
- Sean
I don't know for a fact if it's true....but I can't dismiss it eitherI’m not sure I believe that rumor.
I don't know for a fact if it's true....but I can't dismiss it eitherI’m not sure I believe that rumor.
Understood!I don't know for a fact if it's true....but I can't dismiss it either
Hollywood's a strange place- look at all the actresses who still had to interact with a Harvey Weinstein, even knowing what he had done to either them or others they knew, all for the sake of preserving their careers and livelihood . And that was now, so I can only imagine what it was like in the 40s and 50s and 60sUnderstood!
It was much worse and it goes back to the silent era.Hollywood's a strange place- look at all the actresses who still had to interact with a Harvey Weinstein, even knowing what he had done to either them or others they knew, all for the sake of preserving their careers and livelihood . And that was now, so I can only imagine what it was like in the 40s and 50s and 60s
He is doomed and he knows it, but can't help himself because he's broken inside his head. I don't get hungup on what's film noir and not. My interpretation is probably much broader than most people.I'm not much of a Kirk Douglas fan and never liked this film for a few reasons. But I saw it again a couple weeks ago and liked it more--mainly for the other actors, pretty much all of them (William Bendix, wow!). Douglas is quite good at times, but I always feel he's acting, not being the character. I dont'like seeing DETECTIVE STORY categorized so often as film noir--it has none of the visual style, nor sense of fatalism, unless we see the Douglas character as doomed, which I could accept. As for Wyler, I say his best film of the 1950s is THE DESPERATE HOURS, with its own collection of great performances, spot-on direction and writing.