Kristoffer
Second Unit
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2002
- Messages
- 460
But still it doesn't say anything about HDCD ??
Denon's DVD player lineup also includes the flagship DVD-9000 Audio/Video/Super Audio Player with Denon Link technology (SRP: $3,500), DVD-3800 DVD-Audio/Video Player ($1,199), DVM-4800 5-Disc DVD-Audio/Video Changer ($1,249), DVD-2800 MkII DVD-Video Player ($849), DVD-1600 DVD-Audio/Video Player ($539) and DVD-900 DVD-Video Player ($329).What's wrong here? :rolleyes
He also said that the power supply is smaller in the 2900 than it is on the 3800, and that the 3800 would be more "robust" - whatever that may mean.Figures. Why doesn't Denon simply replace the '3800 and '9000 with '3900 and '9100 universal players? Does it make any sense for their top models to remain DVD-Audio-only? I realize that a higher-end universal player is coming, but we don't know that it will be the caliber of the '9000, nor have we received any word that the '9000 would be discontinued (ditto for the '3800). :frowning:
I am one of those people who has never believed that a large power supply in a DVD player would improve performance. DVD players just don't require huge amounts of power to operate well. Amps and receivers are different of course.My take as well!
The same goes for the ever popular theory of the heavier weight,or the heftier price tag!
Way to go guys at the Secrets!
My guess is that a more "robust" power supply and a heavier chassis on a DVD player is intended to enhance audio performance rather than video performance in units that are intended for use through the analog outputs as well as the digital outputsLike I said it's a popular theory.
I am one of those people who has never believed that a large power supply in a DVD player would improve performance. DVD players just don't require huge amounts of power to operate well. Amps and receivers are different of course.The power supply is just one consideration. However, often times, you find that better CD players have larger toroidal power supplies. Size does matter. However, the rest of the construction has to be up to snuff (transport, analog output stage, etc.). I do not feel that a component has to have bullet-proof outer construction to be a high-quality playback machine. That said, if I am paying big money for a CD player, I like to see first-rate construction. For me, it's about getting a component that looks and feels like it warrants the high price, not simply that the look and feel contribute to the performance I expect. I have a Technics DVD-A10 DVD-Audio player that is built like a rock. Unfortunately, it is a lackluster CD player.
.It's Monday...
I am just glad that Denon went with their own design (eventhough they just rebadged a 3800) instead of using a rebadged Panny for the player.........that would've been disappointing.Absolutely. The '2900 looks like a nice player. Hopefully it will deliver in all aspects.
Kevin,
Right. Is it too much to ask to get a 50-lb. universal player for $1000 that beats out every audio component priced at $5000 and above?
If these are the only differences (those outlined by Jeff Talmadge) between the 3800 and the forthcoming 2900, then it is pointless to purchase the DVD-A only 3800 or the 9000 for that matter. I have said in the past that I never thought the 9000 was worth 3 times the price of the 3800 just as it seems the 3800 does not appear to be worth $200.00 more than the 2900. I don't know if you've seen pictures of the 2900 yet but its the same size as the 3800 and has the SAME video section as the 9000 with a new MPEG decoder to eliminate the chroma bug. The DAC's appear to be top-notch for both DVD-A and SACD playback using Sonys newest second generation native DSD DAC's (whatever they're called). Denon claims the first batch of 2900's, which won't arrive until May, have already been pre-sold according to highfidelityreview.com.Yes I've seen the picture of the 2900.
I'm with you in your observation of price,and supposed quality premium differences.
As the Secreats shootout showed,the extra weight,and price of the 9000 was only good for "Freudian bragging rights".
Denon maybe just realized with the 2900,that what product will sell, based on sensible engineering,that gives real features,and hopefully,better performance then it's predecessors.
That said, if I am paying big money for a CD player, I like to see first-rate construction. For me, it's about getting a component that looks and feels like it warrants the high price,Well the high price is what unnecesarry in the first place IMO.
High end audio is like high end cars,you bound to pay for the name,and for the fact that most of those companies can't buy in bulks like the big ones so the price will go up on the end.
While I like robust looking products,but ultimately it has very little if anything to do with real life performance.