What's new

Dd 5.1 Ex (1 Viewer)

Scott W.

Second Unit
Joined
May 20, 1999
Messages
322
Could Dolby Digital EX also be called DD 6.1? Cause isnt the 'EX' an extra 'centre rear' channel? Info would be appreciated. TIA! :)
Scott
 

Chad Gregory

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 11, 2000
Messages
630
It could only be called 6.1 if it was a seperate channel. It is called 5.1 because the rear center is matrixed into the other rears. Make sense? DTS-ES is 6.1 because of the seperation of the left rear, rear center and right rear into distinct channels.

There must be a better explanation than I'm giving, but you get the jist.

-Chad
 

Michael Reuben

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 12, 1998
Messages
21,763
Real Name
Michael Reuben
Moving this to Receivers/Amps/Separates, where you'll find other discussions of audio formats.
Could Dolby Digital EX also be called DD 6.1?
Chad's explanation is right on the money. The "5" in "5.1" refers to five discrete channels of audio: left, right, center, left surround, rear surround. Dolby Surround EX does not have an additional discrete channel, so calling it "6.1" would be incorrect.
This hasn't stopped a lot of hardware makers from claiming that they make "6.1" and "7.1" receivers and processors. But technically, the only 6.1 format out there is DTS-ES 6.1 Discrete. And there is no -- repeat, zero -- 7.1 format at all.*
M.
*Unless you count SDDS-8, which is strictly for use in commercial theaters.
 

Dan Hitchman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 11, 1999
Messages
2,712
Nothing new to add here, but I thought I'd post anyway. :D
Dolby Digital EX- 5.1 discrete channels, 1 matrix channel
DTS-ES Matrix- 5.1 discrete channels, 1 matrix channel
DTS-ES Discrete- 6.1 discrete channels (backwards compatible with DTS-ES Matrix and DTS 5.1 decoders).
Dan
 

Marty Neudel

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
223
>DTS-ES is 6.1 because of the seperation of the left rear, rear center and right rear into distinct channels.<

One small clarification: in ES-Discrete the left surround, right surround, and back channels are recorded independently, and not subject to later separation.

Remember that our perception of the location of sounds behind us is far less accute than for those in front of us. This most likely accounts for the results of double-blind tests conducted early in the developement of DD-EX that showed no difference in the perception of a discrete or matrixed back channel.

Relative to this, it is important to note that ES-Discrete mixes are optimized for decoding of the discrete back channel. Therefore, they sometimes offer less than ideal playback through the matrix decoder.

Marty
 

Dan Hitchman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 11, 1999
Messages
2,712
Marty,

Having heard DTS-ES Discrete 6.1 tracks on proper DTS-ES decoding equipment, and their DD EX 5.1 counterparts, I have come to the conclusion that the discrete nature of the back surround channel in DTS-ES Discrete 6.1 encoded movies gives a much improved surround presentation.

The problem with DD-EX's use of a matrixed center back channel is the same as any ProLogic matrix encoding as subtle sound effects and less than perfect hard panned left and right positioned sound effects will tend to blob up into the center back channel where they aren't supposed to be. Multiple left-center-right and right-center-left panning are also smeered using a matrixed channel configuration.

Discrete is the only way to go.

Dan
 

Marty Neudel

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
223
Dan,
I was in a test group that spent a total of almost 10 hours (spread over 6 sessions), and we had not come across the artifacts you mentioned. Although, I can't remember any ES/EX mix with panning through the back channel. In fact, it was later explained to us that the back channel was located behind the listener while surround channel sound is placed beside the listener, therefore panning was not a normal procedure. Which films/segments did you find this situation in.
I think this really emphasizes the need for all of us to listen for themselves, using what we read as a guideline not as a 21st century gospel. :)
Marty
 

John Tompkins

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 30, 2000
Messages
658
Remember that our perception of the location of sounds behind us is far less accute than for those in front of us.
This may be true but using logic 7 on the lex which is the only 7.1 discrete "format" so to speak. The independent sounds coming from the BACK l/r speakers are very easily noticeable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,034
Messages
5,129,191
Members
144,286
Latest member
acinstallation172
Recent bookmarks
0
Top