What's new

Dayton Titanic MKII 10" PR or not (1 Viewer)

Mitch N

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
74
I have a bit of a dilemma. I have the parts to build another MKII 10" sub for HT use. I'm debating on going with a PR or going with a port. The problem is that the port length is too long. The ported enclosure I want to make is a 1.41Cu Ft box with a 19.3"x3" vent, tuned to 27hz.

A quick call to Parts Express asking about PR's, and they recommended a 12" Dayton PR Part # 295-192 with no added mass. But they couldn't tell me what it was tuned to. Just a general rule of thumb that the 12" PR mates well with the 10" MKII. They said I could go up to 150g of added mass if I wanted to try it.

What do you think?

Code:
Here are the specs for the MKII 10"
 Fs 28. 
 Qms 9.547
 Vas 38.09 L 
 Xmax 16 mm
 Xmech(est) 24 mm
 Sd .034 sq. m
 Vd(calc) 538 cc
 Qes 0.427
 Re 2.467 ohms
 Le 2.48 mH
 Z(nom) 4 ohms
 BL 11.74
 Qts 0.407
 1-W SPL(calc) 85.1 dB
 

ThomasW

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 6, 1999
Messages
2,282
If you have MS Excel, grab a copy of Unibox software (use can google to find it) then do a proper box simulation.
 

Mitch N

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
74


I tried that, but I get a lot of blank or "#DIV/0" errors. A lot of the fields in the DDBase are empty and I do not know the values for them. I've used Unibox quite a bit and it's great, but I've never mastered adding in my own drivers to the database.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
348,695
Messages
4,853,660
Members
142,365
Latest member
Lola92
Recent bookmarks
0
Top