What's new

Criterion Press Release: Pierrot le fou (Blu-ray) (1 Viewer)

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
66,774
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
CGhaAaDzvaQUyGtIKeyAtcMz5Q790L_large.jpg


Dissatisfied in marriage and life, Ferdinand (Jean-Paul Belmondo) takes to the road with the babysitter, his ex-lover Marianne Renoir (Anna Karina), and leaves the bourgeois world behind. Yet this is no normal road trip: the tenth feature in six years by genius auteur Jean-Luc Godard is a stylish mash-up of anticonsumerist satire, au courant politics, and comic-book aesthetics, as well as a violent, zigzag tale of, as Godard called them, “the last romantic couple.” With blissful color imagery by cinematographer Raoul Coutard and Belmondo and Karina at their most animated, Pierrot le fou is one of the high points of the French New Wave, and was Godard’s last frolic before he moved ever further into radical cinema.
FILM INFO
SPECIAL FEATURES
  • New 2K digital restoration, with uncompressed monaural soundtrack on the Blu-ray
  • Interview with actor Anna Karina from 2007
  • A “Pierrot” Primer, a video essay from 2007 written and narrated by filmmaker Jean-Pierre Gorin
  • Godard, l’amour, la poésie, a fifty-minute French documentary from 2007, directed by Luc Lagier, about director Jean-Luc Godard and his work and marriage with Karina
  • Excerpts of interviews from 1965 with Godard, Karina, and actor Jean-Paul Belmondo
  • Trailer
  • PLUS: An essay by critic Richard Brody, along with (Blu-ray only) a 1969 review by Andrew Sarris and a 1965 interview with Godard
  • New cover by Steve Chow

    October 6, 2020
 

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
66,774
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
Thank you for supporting HTF when you preorder using the link below. If you are using an adblocker you will not see link. As an Amazon Associate HTF earns from qualifying purchases

 
Last edited:

Trancas

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
347
Real Name
Eric
So is it the "New 2K digital restoration" the one from before 2010? In other words the original Criterion transfer? Nowadays who is scanning film elements at 2k? Most films recently released by Kino Lorber have 4k scans........times have changed, cost of 4k scans have changed.
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
So is it the "New 2K digital restoration" the one from before 2010? In other words the original Criterion transfer? Nowadays who is scanning film elements at 2k? Most films recently released by Kino Lorber have 4k scans........times have changed, cost of 4k scans have changed.
This was a 2-perf techniscope production. I'm sure someone more knowledgeable would probably argue otherwise but the image is only 1/2 the size of a standard 35mm frame assuming the element used is pre-conversion (IE:blow-up) to anamorphic.
 

Trancas

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
347
Real Name
Eric
This was a 2-perf techniscope production. I'm sure someone more knowledgeable would probably argue otherwise but the image is only 1/2 the size of a standard 35mm frame assuming the element used is pre-conversion (IE:blow-up) to anamorphic.
That sounds sensible. I remember watching the original blu ray and noticing how coarse the grain was.
But since film moves through the scanner vertically, and the Techniscope negative uses the whole width of the film frame, that means a 2k scanner would have only half the scanning elements employed for a film that is the same width as a conventional full frame negative. Wouldn't that leave things somewhat less well resolved?

2perf-4perf.jpg
 
Last edited:

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,420
Real Name
Robert Harris
That sounds sensible. I remember watching the original blu ray and noticing how coarse the grain was.
But since film moves through the scanner vertically, and the Techniscope negative uses the whole width of the film frame, that means a 2k scanner would have only half the scanning elements employed for a film that is the same width as a conventional full frame negative. Wouldn't that leave things somewhat less well resolved?

View attachment 75526
Correct
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,051
Messages
5,129,590
Members
144,285
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top