lj01
Agent
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 42
- Real Name
- Lyle
I'm curious (and would be much interested in any industry insiders that might chime in) as to where it's making most sense, business-wise, to release complete series vs one-at-a-time these days.
We can probably all agree that profit & loss probably rests on units sold in the first 3-6 months of release, getting folks that will pay the earliest and highest price points.
I would assume that years ago, when TV-on-DVD was first getting started, that profits could be maximized by releasing one-at-a-time. For I Love Lucy or The Brady Bunch, those buyers were there and more than willing to pay the early price point.
But in these, the mature days of TV-on-DVD, it's more or less titles that have less broad appeal. Taking into mind the recent VEI announcement - shows such as Barnaby Jones - would VEI get most bang by releasing a complete series or by releasing one-at-a-time, maybe one every 6-9 months? Of course a complete series comes at a lower per-season cost. In the Barnaby Jones example, generally the same people would buy each season upon release as would buy the complete series (although it could be argued that more people would buy a complete series). So, releasing the remaining 7 seasons at a retail point of $40 per season over the course of say 3-5 years vs a complete series at a retail point of, say, $199? I suppose when you take time value of money into consideration also, it may even out. Thus, it would generally appear that complete series is the best way to maximize profits (and then sell individual seasons to pick up a few more $).
That's just my general sense, I'm assuming the studios and VEI/Shout/whomever have an army of CPAs to figure this stuff out.
The industry has always been somewhat shrouded in mystery, from the sense of sales figures to what might be holding up releases, etc. There's not a lot of transparency, in general, which is probably true of most industries.
So, it's all guesses and conjecture, but I'm curious what others might think...or know?
We can probably all agree that profit & loss probably rests on units sold in the first 3-6 months of release, getting folks that will pay the earliest and highest price points.
I would assume that years ago, when TV-on-DVD was first getting started, that profits could be maximized by releasing one-at-a-time. For I Love Lucy or The Brady Bunch, those buyers were there and more than willing to pay the early price point.
But in these, the mature days of TV-on-DVD, it's more or less titles that have less broad appeal. Taking into mind the recent VEI announcement - shows such as Barnaby Jones - would VEI get most bang by releasing a complete series or by releasing one-at-a-time, maybe one every 6-9 months? Of course a complete series comes at a lower per-season cost. In the Barnaby Jones example, generally the same people would buy each season upon release as would buy the complete series (although it could be argued that more people would buy a complete series). So, releasing the remaining 7 seasons at a retail point of $40 per season over the course of say 3-5 years vs a complete series at a retail point of, say, $199? I suppose when you take time value of money into consideration also, it may even out. Thus, it would generally appear that complete series is the best way to maximize profits (and then sell individual seasons to pick up a few more $).
That's just my general sense, I'm assuming the studios and VEI/Shout/whomever have an army of CPAs to figure this stuff out.
The industry has always been somewhat shrouded in mystery, from the sense of sales figures to what might be holding up releases, etc. There's not a lot of transparency, in general, which is probably true of most industries.
So, it's all guesses and conjecture, but I'm curious what others might think...or know?