What's new

Classic rock... king of stereo gimmicks! (1 Viewer)

Rob Lutter

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2000
Messages
4,523
Anyone else dislike stereo remixes having the vocals track in one ear and the instumentals spread across the channels? I find it really jarring when that happens. I think it is wanted, expected, and more REALISTIC to have the vocals in the middle field.

Some offenders and The Beatles and Jimi Hendrix :D

Although it might just be nitpicking ;)
 

Rachael B

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2000
Messages
4,740
Location
Knocksville, TN
Real Name
Rachael Bellomy
The thing that I have noticed on some 60's stuff that was orginally mono and "electronically rechanneled for stereo" < (a quote right off the cover of Donovan's MELLOW YELLOW) is the incredible amont of hiss that was often generated. That's what really bothers me anyway.
 

MarkHastings

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
12,013
When I was a teen, my friends car had one speaker blown out and everytime we listened to classic rock, it was an EXPERIENCE! :D (Try listening to Bohemian Rhapsody without the left speaker ;))

I remember how we never heard Eddie Van Halens guitar everytime we played their first record. :angry:
 

Brian L

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 8, 1998
Messages
3,298
Personally, I kind of like it that way. Makes it much easier to pick-out individual parts.

I tend to prefer that to cases where the artist uses so many tracks that nothing seems to have its on space in the mix....it comes out sounding like sonic mush.

IMHO, of course.

Brian
 

andrew markworthy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 30, 1999
Messages
4,762
The point's been raised in another thread, but in the case of The Beatles, the early 'stereo' records weren't originally intended to be released. The 'left' and 'right' channels were simply the separate tracks that were intended to be mixed down into mono - there were *not* intended to be heard as separate channels. However, the US marketing departments' thirst for everything to be 'stereo' (no matter how aesthetically unpleasing) meant that the early Beatles albums, that had been released in their intended mono form in the UK, were released in this ersatz 'stereo' in the USA. I personally think they sound awful. Indeed, up to The White Album, I prefer the Beatles albums in mono (including Sgt Pepper which in any case uses radically different mixes).
 

Tim Fennell

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Messages
139
Some of the worst are the early Grand Funk albums with bass on one side and drums on the other. To me drums belong in both channels.

Tim
 

Tim Fennell

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Messages
139
Some of the worst are the early Grand Funk albums with bass on one side and drums on the other. To me drums belong in both channels.

Tim
 

Wayne Bundrick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 17, 1999
Messages
2,358
I recall hearing an AM radio station play Simon & Garfunkel's "The Sound of Silence". The station wasn't properly downmixing stereo to mono, or perhaps just that particular turntable wasn't, and I couldn't hear Simon. Or maybe it was Garfunkel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
355,813
Messages
5,092,506
Members
143,938
Latest member
andriesprice
Recent bookmarks
0
Top