Eric Massey
Agent
- Joined
- May 21, 2001
- Messages
- 31
Deleted.
(Admin has amended this post).
(Admin has amended this post).
I do all my encoding with Lame using the R3Mix.net variable encoding settings.Rob:
Have you tried using the "--alt-preset standard" setting w/ LAME 3.92? That'll give you even better mp3s, although the bitrate would be a bit higher depending on the music....~200kbps-ish. Try it out, although you seem pretty happy with things the way they are. This is probably about as close to cd as mp3 can get at the moment.
Just wondering...
Have you tried using the "--alt-preset standard" setting w/ LAME 3.92?Watch out there is a bug in the 3.92 version in lame. You could read about it here http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/index.p...ST&f=16&t=4455
The good news is there is a new version available that addresses the issue. Just a heads up.
I think I've confirmed for myself that MP3's do in fact sound worse (albeit slightly) than the original CD.
Here's a different way to run the same test without bootlegging:
1) Rip your own CDs to WAV files.
2) Encode the WAV files to MP3. Don't erase the WAV files.
3) Burn both the WAV files and MP3 files as consecutive tracks on a single CD-R.
4) Listen to the CD-R and switch between tracks to test.I did the same thing a while back and honestly i couldn't tell the difference. The mp3's were encoded using the r3mix settings with lame 3.91.
Test CD's that i used included:
Alice in Chains - MTV Unplugged
Fleetwood Mac - Rumours
Shakira - Donde Estan los Ladrones
Equipment:
HTPC with Audigy Platinum Soundcard
Denon 3802
Paradigm Studio 20's
It could be that my equipment isn't up to snuff enough to make the differences between the wav and mp3 files obvious to detect so take it with a grain of salt.
Needless to say i have my 500+ cd collection archived in my hard drive. It's just too sweet not having to switch CD's all the time!!!