The Drifter
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2019
- Messages
- 1,153
- Real Name
- Jim
There’s very little correlation between the number of discs and quality of set when it comes to Blu-ray. I’ve been ripping my collection for the past year, and what I’ve found time and again is that in the overwhelming majority of cases, no one is using the full capacity of the disc. And as someone who used to work in preparing material for release on disc, I can say without a doubt in my mind that sometimes the disc count is upped because the marketing people believe that will be a useful selling point. There are so many sets where they use more discs that were strictly necessary to utilize the perception that more discs equals higher quality. The same for dual layer discs vs single layer discs. But the data doesn’t lie. And I’m not talking about bargain basement outlets but mainstream studios and highly regarded boutique labels. The physical cost of adding a second disc might only be between a quarter and a dollar but the retail price can be doubled for the inclusion.
Well put, well said. I collected TV shows on DVD back in the 200X's & early 20XX's, and remember that there were numerous times they 'padded' the DVD sets by only having 1-2 episodes per Disk, when they could easily have had 3-4 episodes per Disk - without having the PQ suffer at all. Obviously they were including more Disks so that the perception would be that the sets would be more valuable (with more Disks) - which justified them jacking up the price. When, in reality - it would have been better to have less Disks per set since the packaging would have been slimmer; less disks per set meant less disks prone to scratches/breaking free of the cases, etc.
However, in a world where many people are moving away from physical media altogether (present company excluded, of course) I'm not sure how big of a deal this is anymore.