What's new

Buying an early 1990's late 80's A/V Receiver. (1 Viewer)

Raymond lee Leggs

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
171
Real Name
Raymond Lee Leggs
Is it okay to buy an ancient HT/Sound system receiver? there are some pretty cheap ant a pawn shop and they work and sound great (a little Dirty) but they do kick A**

I don't want all the fancy HDMI stuff I just want a simple old school A/V setup. :D (I am a Classic audio/Vintage nut lol.) :laugh:

I did see several odd all-in one with subwoofer output for a sub and 4 speaker outputs.

I could use the 2-channel kenwood 103AR I have
laying around (not many inputs) I really only use it occasionally as my vintage receiver sounds better lol. (not many inputs either)

I am going to get some old school speakers to hook this up to if ZI do get an ancient HT receiver ...
 

Wayne A. Pflughaupt

Moderator
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 1999
Messages
6,682
Location
Corpus Christi, TX
Real Name
Wayne

Assuming you’d want to watch DVDs, you’ll want one with Dolby Digital. I think that’ll mean you’ll need at least a mid-90s model receiver.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Premium
Ambassador
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
15,904
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
I agree with Wayne. I have several mid 80s H/K receivers for music around the house, and they are great stuff I got cheap on eBay. HT is another deal entirely. For that, you most likely want at least DD, which is probably not on that equipment.
 

Jeff Gatie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
6,531
Personally, I'd hardly call a 90's receiver "classic", never mind "vintage". My parent's KLH table radio with the tweed speaker cover, rosewood cabinet and all tube electronics is "vintage", whereas 90's receivers are just out of date.

The basic function and performace of an AM/FM table radio hasn't really changed in the last 60 years, whereas A/V receivers have gone through huge changes in the last 15. Analog->digital being the main one. I know a few people who love the nostalgic tube sound of an old table radio, but I don't know many who long for the "good old days" of Pro-Logic. :laugh:
 

LanceJ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
3,168
While Dolby Digital definitely sounds better than Dolby Surround (the encoding format that Dolby Surround/Dolby Pro-Logic decoders use), particularly the fact its rear channels are stereo & full range,* if the receiver is in good shape, not expensive and the HT system is not intended for critical listening, I would go for it. There were some awesome receivers built back then that still sound great, even if "just" their stereo mode is used. For example when I sold HT in the early/mid 90s the $1600 VSX-D2, the non-Elite version (no wood, copper chassis & certain internal components) of this Pioneer, is what we were fortunate to use as a demo receiver in our HT system for an entire year. And I still haven't seen a receiver with a GUI, an animated GUI to boot, as sophisticated (click on that page's "more" button).

Anyway........a lot of dvds contain a Dolby Surround-encoded stereo** audio option & when that is chosen & the player's analog outputs are connected to the receiver, depending on what the director wanted you to hear, Dolby Surround is fully capable of front-to-back (and vice-versa) directional effects & good ambience fill-in effects like audience noises, the sound of large spaces like airports, plates clinking behind you in a restaurant scene, etc.

And even if there is no Dolby Surround option, on a standard dvd-video player a disc's 5.1 channel track is downmixed by the player into a stereo mix - minus the LFE channel - and many times a Dolby Surround/DPL decoder can still extract useful surround information from it.

* don't forget though that like an MP3 file, Dolby Digital is a lossy audio format and its 448kbps data rate spread over six channels limits its ability to - in my opinion - to sound as good as certain older analog formats, particularly Hi-Fi Stereo on the VHS and Beta formats. --> I'm not talking about surround sound, just the sound itself.

** many stereo tracks will contain "accidental" surround info in them, because of microphone placement for example, so sometimes you'll get bonus surround effects. :)
 

Andy_A

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 19, 2001
Messages
477
you definitely want dolby digital and or dts. I'd look for the 5.1 channel input also. If you look, you should be able to find something with these features for under $100. Also, older receivers often had the crossover fixed at 100hz, instead of the more desirable 80. Be sure to check into that spec when buying an older receiver...
 

Jeff Gatie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
6,531

He'll be hard pressed to find a DD/DTS receiver from the "early 1990's late 80's." The first consumer DD release was the Laser Disk of Clear and Present Danger in 1995. Actual DD capable receivers didn't show up until late '95, early '96.
 

LanceJ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
3,168
Yep. When I worked at Incredible Universe in Xmas of '95, the brand spanking new version of the Pioneer I spoke of above included it (looked exactly the same). IIRC it cost @$2,000.

As far as external decoders for DD and DTS that can be hooked up via 5.1 input, AFAIK the most common one was this: Technics SH-AC500D
 

Andy_A

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 19, 2001
Messages
477
sorry for the confusion... I didn't mean to imply one could by a late 80's or mid 90's receiver w/ DTS. Even DD would be very uncommon until the mid 90s. However, for the money, I think you could get one which has both of these features.

It seems that this would be the best value for the money on the used market.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

Threads
350,692
Messages
4,926,805
Members
142,888
Latest member
boreli
Recent bookmarks
0
Top