HIGHLY recommended by me.
http://www.avclub.com/review/bryan-cranston-goes-all-way-his-characterization-l-237138
http://www.avclub.com/review/bryan-cranston-goes-all-way-his-characterization-l-237138
I agree completely. I thought it was magnificent.HIGHLY recommended by me.
http://www.avclub.com/review/bryan-cranston-goes-all-way-his-characterization-l-237138
LBJ was a sonuvabitch. This movie showed it at times -- LBJ pushing the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution when he damn well knew that no attack had occurred, launching an impromptu Rose Garden press conference to get cameras off of Fannie Lou Hamer's testimony before the credentials committee -- but probably not the worst of it. That being said, I'm not sure that a more moral man could have gotten the Civil Rights Act (or the Great Society programs) through Congress. LBJ succeeded because he did what was necessary to achieve his objectives.Finally got to see this and it was great. Having lived through the time as a young teenager, I had no sympathy for LBJ back then, but this slice of his life surely shows he was a great president and great American.
I agree 100 percent. It walked the tightrope between being too stagey and too obtrusive. The way it was filmed felt both understated and contemporary, even though everything within the frame was 1963-64.I thought the cinematography in particular was excellent.
A lot of great Americans have been SOBs, LBJ was just the SOB du jour, and a good one at that.LBJ was a sonuvabitch. This movie showed it at times -- LBJ pushing the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution when he damn well knew that no attack had occurred, launching an impromptu Rose Garden press conference to get cameras off of Fannie Lou Hamer's testimony before the credentials committee -- but probably not the worst of it. That being said, I'm not sure that a more moral man could have gotten the Civil Rights Act (or the Great Society programs) through Congress. LBJ succeeded because he did what was necessary to achieve his objectives.