What's new

Which studio/company do you want to co-finance and distribute Bond 25?

  • Warner Bros.

    Votes: 19 41.3%
  • Sony Pictures

    Votes: 13 28.3%
  • 20th Century Fox

    Votes: 5 10.9%
  • Universal Pictures

    Votes: 2 4.3%
  • Annapurna Pictures

    Votes: 3 6.5%
  • Apple

    Votes: 2 4.3%
  • Amazon

    Votes: 2 4.3%

  • Total voters
    46

Tommy R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
2,160
Real Name
Tommy
To be far, Casino Royale was something like 2 hours 20 minutes, two years before the MCU started. Skyfall and Spectre were slightly longer and don’t see that as a Marvel influence.
 

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
42,490
Location
The basement of the FBI building
My biggest problem with most of the Daniel Craig Bond movies was that they felt way too long and this one is 20 minutes longer? I'm judging before I see it but I can't see a longer run time being something that I end up liking even if the movie is something I overall enjoy. And it's not a blind prejudice against 3 hour movies because the last couple Avengers movies and Peter Jackson & James Cameron make long movies but they moved. Conversely, the recent Bond movies are shorter than those movies but feel like they were a day and a half long because they had a bunch of extra needless action scenes to make sure the movie ran really long.
 

Tommy R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
2,160
Real Name
Tommy
I actually find some of those Marvel movies to bee too long. And if any of the Craig Bond’s could have benefited from bing a little shorter IMO it would be Casino Royale, which was shorter than both Skyfall and Spectre.
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,252
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
Not surprisingly, it's officially PG-13. There are also rumours floating around that there may be a post-converted 3D version.
 

Edwin-S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
10,007
Watching the trailer, it comes across as yet another "existential angst" Bond film. Whatever happened to just making these things entertaining instead of always trying to send us a "message".
 

Tommy R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
2,160
Real Name
Tommy
I for one don’t mind the direction and tone they’ve gone with since Craig came on and I feel it’s one of the best eras of Bond on film. I wouldn’t say they had “messages”, but are just more deep and interesting than the average Bond while also entertaining in a Bondian way. A lot of stuff in there that really feels like the books (at least the good aspects of the books, which could be extremely flawed at times).

I know a lot of people enjoy making fun of how they’ve done the “this time it’s personal” angle since Licence to Kill, which I always found to be a bit of an overstatement. But I know that they just aren’t for everyone regardless. I’m just happy for what we’ve been getting since 2006. :)
 

Osato

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2001
Messages
8,238
Real Name
Tim
With the longer run time I feel like Bond has time on his hands / side....

this film will have “all the time in the world” to tell it’s story!!!
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,382
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
I think this director is actually really good at doing deliberately paced, slow burn, great tension type of direction so a longer runtime could be a plus in his hands.
 

AshJW

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
1,172
Location
Hamburg, Germany
Real Name
Thomas
I will watch it with my dad, as we (alongside with my brother) did this since Moonraker came out.
We had a break after Roger Moore had his last 007-film and continued the tradition when Daniel Craig began his 007 career.
 

SamT

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
5,827
Real Name
Sam
ER8FbHVWoAArwvt
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,219
Real Name
Malcolm
What's with Rami Malek's face? Looks like they aged him, rather than the de-aging we've seen recently on other films.
 

Edwin-S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
10,007
Poster art = dull and unimaginative. The art of the theatre poster has been lost since photography replaced hand-drawn and painted poster art.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,035
Messages
5,129,227
Members
144,286
Latest member
acinstallation172
Recent bookmarks
0
Top