1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

Bond 25 - "No Time to Die" (2019)

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Nate Spidgewood, Oct 17, 2017.

?

Which studio/company do you want to co-finance and distribute Bond 25?

  1. Warner Bros.

    11 vote(s)
    39.3%
  2. Sony Pictures

    6 vote(s)
    21.4%
  3. 20th Century Fox

    6 vote(s)
    21.4%
  4. Universal Pictures

    1 vote(s)
    3.6%
  5. Annapurna Pictures

    2 vote(s)
    7.1%
  6. Apple

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Amazon

    2 vote(s)
    7.1%
  1. Message #1 of 517 Oct 17, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 23, 2018
    Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    [​IMG]
    Title: Bond 25 (2019)

    Genre: Action, Thriller, Adventure

    Director:

    Cast: Daniel Craig, Helena Bonham Carter, Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris, Ralph Fiennes, Rory Kinnear, Mark Strong

    Release Date:

    Runtime: 0

    Plot:


    Last time it was reported, apparently Apple and Amazon joined the Bond 25 bidding war to fight for the rights to the James Bond franchise, and it was last month. Not to mention, Warner Bros. is currently the most aggressive studio to secure the co-financing and distribution rights to the new Jame Bond movie, but MGM is still quiet about a new deal. (I even called up MGM, but a woman working there doesn't understand what I was trying to tell her, and I did leave a voice message for the president of the motion picture department). I'm still rooting for Warner Bros. over Sony since they've made some recent movies with MGM, and I sure hope a deal like this happens very soon.
     
    Osato likes this.
  2. Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    EDIT
     
  3. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    8,715
    Likes Received:
    3,893
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    I don't really care who partners on the next Bond movie, I just want it to be someone who will encourage the producers to make something that feels like a Bond movie. Or, to be more precise, a classic Bond movie, not these things that have been made for the last 25 years.
     
  4. atcolomb

    atcolomb Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Chicago Area
    Real Name:
    Angelo
    What is the current status of United Artists? They did release most of the Bond films.
     
    Osato likes this.
  5. Lord Dalek

    Lord Dalek Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    1,419
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Joel Henderson
    Dead and getting deader.
     
    Osato and atcolomb like this.
  6. atcolomb

    atcolomb Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Chicago Area
    Real Name:
    Angelo
    What a shame and I just finished reading the 2 book history on United Artists by Tino Balio.
     
    Osato likes this.
  7. Message #7 of 517 Oct 18, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2017
    Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    It's presently dormant, like it used to be in the early 90s. I do wish MGM revives UA as a pet financing/distribution studio to release not only their movies that don't get picked up by other studios, but to (co-)finance, acquire and release large independent movies too, like in UA's glory days. They've already revived Orion Pictures as a standalone distribution company for releasing modest budget movies.

    Have no idea why two people voted for Fox though. I know they handle home entertainment distribution of MGM's library, TV shows and select new films, but I don't think they're interested in grabbing the theatrical distribution rights for Bond. And I know Bond was a UA franchise/property, but since it's MGM's biggest crown jewel both for movies and for their current library, I thought WB grabbing the rights would see an even bigger reunion between the MGM brand and its legacy pre-1986 library, so I see them as a perfect fit.
     
    Osato and atcolomb like this.
  8. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,047
    Likes Received:
    18,763
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    I don't think it makes a difference which distributor picks it up. It's a financing deal; whoever picks it up will not be getting creative input on the series, so the final product will remain the same whoever gets it.
     
    PMF, Osato and Tino like this.
  9. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
  10. Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    Osato likes this.
  11. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    I'm not sure what it means. MGM's press release on their website mentions that Creed 2 is in partnership with Warner Bros., so I would suspect at least that sequels to films they made in partnership will still involve their original partner studios. However, it does look like they are moving more into self-distribution for new titles, and they specifically left the Bond distribution "to be announced later," but since Bond is very much their flagship franchise, it wouldn't surprise me much if they wanted to do it themselves.
     
    Osato likes this.
  12. Message #12 of 517 Oct 31, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2017
    Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    Will Bond 25 still go to any distributor other than Annapurna since it's part of a high-profile big budget franchise (plus, what about WB? Aren't they still in front of the running to secure the rights?), and can WB still market and release Creed 2 worldwide?
     
    Osato likes this.
  13. Osato

    Osato Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2001
    Messages:
    5,231
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
  14. Message #14 of 517 Oct 31, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2017
    Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
  15. Osato

    Osato Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2001
    Messages:
    5,231
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Wake me up when it arrives.

    : )
     
  16. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    The thing is that Annapurna is not the distributor for the partnership announced today. MGM and Annapurna are simply pooling their resources to create a single combined distribution entity, but MGM will view that as self-distributing their films. They will retain autonomy on their own slate, and they will each put things out under their own names and logos. So, if MGM thinks that this new venture has the infrastructure to handle Bond, I could absolutely see them doing it themselves. This is *not* MGM entering into a distribution deal with Annapurna where they would pay Annapurna a distribution fee; it's a new joint venture for both companies to distribute their own films within the same infrastructure.
     
  17. Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    I know that, but what I'm asking is, will Bond 25 still be picked up by any major studio willing to distribute (especially WB), and can WB still market and release Creed 2 worldwide?
     
  18. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    I think Bond 25 is MGM''s choice. Clearly almost any studio would love to have it, but that depends entirely on what MGM wants to do with it since ultimately it is their IP. As far as Creed, the MGM press release said it would be released in partnership with WB, and that is all the information I've been able to find on that. I suspect this stuff may still be being figued out at the studio level, so there may not be anymore to know at this point.
     
  19. Message #19 of 517 Nov 1, 2017
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2017
    Nate Spidgewood

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Nate Spidgewood
    I recall reading at one point that MGM said they're looking for a more lucrative deal for the Bond film, so I believe they should still talk with WB about mulling the deal.

    But, can MGM still collaborate with WB and other studios, even after they formed their joint venture with Annapurna?

    (Also, it's said that Creed 2 is in MGM/Annapurna's hands, but since it's being released in partnership with WB, will the latter release it internationally only, or worldwide?)
     
  20. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    I haven't seen anything saying that the partnership with Annapurna has to be exclusive, so yes, I think that MGM would be able to take Bond elsewhere if they chose. Creed remains unclear. As this announcement yesterday was the first mention ever of a release date for Creed 2, and it was buried in the announcement of the new venture, I would think there will be a more formal release coming from WB and MGM about that soon.

    It's also worth noting that Wednesday, November 21 is only a few days after the previous Friday, November 16 sees WB launch the Fantastic Beasts sequel. Whether they would want to release two films in that close proximity to each other is an open question (although there would not necessarily be a huge overlap in audience for those properties if they did -- some, of course, but those are clearly going to be marketed differently toward different audience segments anyway.)
     

Share This Page

Movie information in first post provided by The Movie Database