What's new

Which studio/company do you want to co-finance and distribute Bond 25?

  • Warner Bros.

    Votes: 19 41.3%
  • Sony Pictures

    Votes: 13 28.3%
  • 20th Century Fox

    Votes: 5 10.9%
  • Universal Pictures

    Votes: 2 4.3%
  • Annapurna Pictures

    Votes: 3 6.5%
  • Apple

    Votes: 2 4.3%
  • Amazon

    Votes: 2 4.3%

  • Total voters
    46

Jake Lipson

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
24,643
Real Name
Jake Lipson
All good points. If they can do it, more power to them. But making it a sprint like that might be part of why Craig finds it so exhausting.
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,385
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
It's amazing to think that when this is released in 2019, Daniel Craig will have been "James Bond" for 13 years, but only appeared in five films. Roger Moore appeared in seven films which were released in the span of 12 years (1973-1985). Sean Connery appeared in five Bond films over a five year span (1962-1967).

Prior to Craig, the longest gap between Bond films was six years (1989-1995, between Licence To Kill and GoldenEye), but the longest gap between Bond films without changing actors was only three years (Between The Man With The Golden Gun in 1974 and The Spy Who Loved Me in 1977). With Craig, he's now matched that gap once (between Skyfall in 2012 and Spectre in 2015), and exceeded it twice (four years between Quantum Of Solace in 2008 and Skyfall in 2012, and now Spectre in 2015 and Bond 25 in 2019).

I'm a little disappointed that not only has each Craig film been lesser than the one it follows up in my eyes, but that it's an ever increasing wait. It wouldn't be as big a deal to have a lesser Bond film coming out if it came frequently, but to wait four years for Skyfall (which is so beautifully shot that you don't notice how it doesn't actually make any sense) and three years for Spectre (which is a pretty weak film), it's frustrating to wait so long for diminishing returns. I think Craig is one of the very best actors to ever play Bond, but he's been let down by his writers.
 

Winston T. Boogie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
11,708
Location
Agua Verde
Real Name
Pike Bishop
No, your mind is fine. I typed "2018" in my above post, reflexively, since that is this year and I'm used to keying it for dates. But what I actually meant was 2019; you just replied and caught it before I could edit my earlier post to fix it. So, yes, the release date has always been set for 2019, and that was my typo. Sorry.

No problem...I occasionally think I have gone completely insane so I was just having one of those moments.

I think they actually worked on the the final cut of Skyfall and Spectre right up until about a week before they screened them for their respective premiers so my guess is this film will also be a work in progress right up until the final minute again.
 

Osato

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2001
Messages
8,242
Real Name
Tim
It's amazing to think that when this is released in 2019, Daniel Craig will have been "James Bond" for 13 years, but only appeared in five films. Roger Moore appeared in seven films which were released in the span of 12 years (1973-1985). Sean Connery appeared in five Bond films over a five year span (1962-1967).

Prior to Craig, the longest gap between Bond films was six years (1989-1995, between Licence To Kill and GoldenEye), but the longest gap between Bond films without changing actors was only three years (Between The Man With The Golden Gun in 1974 and The Spy Who Loved Me in 1977). With Craig, he's now matched that gap once (between Skyfall in 2012 and Spectre in 2015), and exceeded it twice (four years between Quantum Of Solace in 2008 and Skyfall in 2012, and now Spectre in 2015 and Bond 25 in 2019).

I'm a little disappointed that not only has each Craig film been lesser than the one it follows up in my eyes, but that it's an ever increasing wait. It wouldn't be as big a deal to have a lesser Bond film coming out if it came frequently, but to wait four years for Skyfall (which is so beautifully shot that you don't notice how it doesn't actually make any sense) and three years for Spectre (which is a pretty weak film), it's frustrating to wait so long for diminishing returns. I think Craig is one of the very best actors to ever play Bond, but he's been let down by his writers.

In addition to the 50 year old Daniel Craig, it will be curious to see what the budget is like for Bond 25.
I know SPECTRE was way overbudget and a lot of cuts were made in terms of location filming too.

$$$$$$???? I wonder if another distribution partner will need to be included to help fund the film. Sony put up a lot of $ on the last few films. Annapurna doesn't have very deep pockets..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annapurna_Pictures
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,257
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
Prior to Craig, the longest gap between Bond films was six years (1989-1995, between Licence To Kill and GoldenEye), but the longest gap between Bond films without changing actors was only three years (Between The Man With The Golden Gun in 1974 and The Spy Who Loved Me in 1977)...

It wasn't even three years. Golden Gun came out in Christmas of '74 and Spy in the summer of '77.
 

JimmyO

Berserker
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
1,063
Real Name
Jim
I am really hoping that this is Daniel Craigs very best Bond film. I won't be the least bit surprised if not, however. I have never gotten a good feeling that the Bond scripts were particularly well written for his Bond style.

I loved Casino Royale - and I felt Eva Green was an excellent partner for Craig in that film. Their chemistry worked. I couldn't for the life of me even tell you the actress or character that rolled with Bond in Solace (lead contender for worst Bond film title ever IMHO), and I never saw Spectre as the reviews and word of mouth were not good at all. I am sure I will see it some day.

Royale was the truest Craig Bond for me. He clashes with M, breaks the rules to get what he needs using actual spy techniques, it all worked. I didn't even miss the whole Q angle of introducing an obscure gadget that does one very specific weird thing that will get him out of a jam. Although I guess the defibrillator might count as fitting that bill. Nevermind!

Heck of a good deal that Bond has that magnetic watch in Live and Let die, eh? :D
 

Jake Lipson

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
24,643
Real Name
Jake Lipson
I feel like the odd numbered films in Craig's tenure have been better than the even numbered ones. Casino, Solace was below average, Skyfall was my favorite and Spectre was average. So, hopefully they will follow their inadvertent pastern and rebound again with this one.
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,257
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
I really wish MGM would just die already. Bond is pretty much the only thing that's kept it afloat for almost 40 years now, and its swallowing up United Artists is probably the worst thing that happened to the series.
 

Osato

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2001
Messages
8,242
Real Name
Tim
I really wish MGM would just die already. Bond is pretty much the only thing that's kept it afloat for almost 40 years now, and its swallowing up United Artists is probably the worst thing that happened to the series.

It would be great if mgm would just sell their Bond shares off to another studio.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,663
Members
144,281
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top