What's new

Blade Runner tops scientist poll (1 Viewer)

Kachi Khatri

Second Unit
Joined
Oct 29, 2002
Messages
454
Real Name
Jay
Scientists' Top 10 Sci-Fi Films

SCIENTISTS' TOP 10 SCI-FI FILMS

1. Blade Runner (1982)
2. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
3. Star Wars (1977)/Empire Strikes Back (1980)
4. Alien (1979)
5. Solaris (1972)
6. Terminator (1984)/T2: Judgement Day (1991)
7. Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)
8. War of the Worlds (1953)
9. The Matrix (1999)
10. Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)


Eminent world scientists have voted Ridley Scott's Blade Runner the best science fiction film to date.
The 1982 movie, in which retired cop Harrison Ford hunts four renegade human replicants, came top in a poll of 60 scientists by the Guardian newspaper.

Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey came second, with Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back taking third place.

Stephen Minger, a stem cell biologist, said Blade Runner had won because it was "so far ahead of its time".

The film was loosely based on the Philip K Dick short story Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and is set in a dystopian futuristic vision of Los Angeles.

Mr Minger, from King's College, London, said: "Blade Runner is the best movie ever made.

"It was so far ahead of its time and the whole premise of the story - what is it to be human and who are we, where we come from? It's the age-old questions."

Chris Frith of the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at University College, London, paid tribute to the film's discussion of how to tell a human from a machine.

'Appealing idea'

The empathy test used by the movie's policemen "is not far away from the sort of thing that cognitive neuroscientists are actually doing today," he said.

Kubrick and author Arthur C Clarke's collaboration, 2001: A Space Odyssey, was rated highly in the poll for special effects which were revolutionary at the time it was filmed in 1968.

Other movies which made it into the scientists' top 10 included Terminator and T2: Judgement Day, The Day the Earth Stood Still and The Matrix.

Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, California, voted for the 1953 classic, War of the Worlds.

He said: "The idea that there could be life that's developed in completely other circumstances in a completely different world which you would never recognise. That's a very appealing idea."


The scientists were also asked by the Guardian to vote for their favourite authors.

Isaac Asimov headed the list for his novel I, Robot - which has just been made into a film starring Will Smith - and the Foundation Trilogy.

Day of the Triffids by John Wyndham was also a favourite, as was Fred Hoyle's The Black Cloud.

Other writers in the top 10 included Arthur C Clarke, Ursula le Guin, Philip K Dick, Ray Bradbury, Frank Herbert and Stanislaw Lem.
 

Ron-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
6,300
Real Name
Ron
All great Sci-Fi films. I'd rate them as follows...

1. Alien (1979)
2. Blade Runner (1982)
3. War of the Worlds (1953)
4. Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)
5. Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)
6. Star Wars (1977)/Empire Strikes Back (1980)
7. Terminator (1984)/T2: Judgement Day (1991)
8. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
9. The Matrix (1999)
10. Solaris (1972)
 

Zen Butler

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Messages
5,568
Location
Southern, Ca
Real Name
Zen K. Butler
Good list

There are a few I'm surprised are even included on a "Scientist's" list. Honestly, as to "hard sci-fi", #2 should have been #1.

1,2,4,5,7 & 8 are some of my favorite films in any genre.



Without a doubt. A great, if not underrated film.
 

george kaplan

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2001
Messages
13,063
My top 10:

Star Wars
2001: A Space Odyssey
The Empire Strikes BAck
Back to the Future
E.T.
Blade Runner
The Terminator
Terminator 2
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea


Some of those 50s films that made the list might have been based on good ideas, but they're still pretty much B films, which have never appealed to me. Besides, I think time travel is a much more interesting idea than alien invaders. :)
 

Aaron Silverman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 22, 1999
Messages
11,411
Location
Florida
Real Name
Aaron Silverman
An interesting list. I like how they only include the first two films in the Star Wars and Terminator series! :) (Although I did like T3.)

A picky point: Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep is a novel, not a short story, and I, Robot is a collection of stories, not a novel. :D
 

Michael Harris

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Messages
1,344
Good list. I just don't agree with the order.

1. 2001
2. Alien
3. Blade Runner

Then the rest in no paticular order though I have to admit I've never seen "Solaris (1972)". Of course we could open a can of worms and argue what constitutes "Science Fiction".
 

Steve Christou

Long Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2000
Messages
16,333
Location
Manchester, England
Real Name
Steve Christou
Interesting list. Good selection. But I'm a bit surprised 'eminent world scientists' prefer 'androids on the rampage actioner' Blade Runner to that 'ultimate trip' 2001.
And I would have taken out 'cure for insomnia' Solaris and replaced it with the 50's 'super classic' Forbidden Planet. :)
 

DaveF

Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
28,753
Location
Catfisch Cinema
Real Name
Dave
You must not know many scientists :) They are also known to like Beavis and Butthead, listen to death-metal, and go to monster-truck shows.

I agree, Gattaca is deserving of the list. And I'm a scientist -- just not eminent ;)
 

Kevin M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2000
Messages
5,172
Real Name
Kevin Ray

Personally I would describe it as a "large novella", smaller than a standard novel yet bigger than a standard novella.
 

george kaplan

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2001
Messages
13,063
You know, I'm a scientist, so I was trying to figure out why I didn't get a vote. Then I noticed the 'eminent' adjective. I'm many things, but that ain't one of them. :)
 

TheLongshot

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 12, 2000
Messages
4,118
Real Name
Jason


You ain't kidding me. Solaris was the "surprise" at the 1am mark of the CWRU SF marathon. I have to say, no better movie to go to sleep to. I couldn't stay awake even if I wanted to...

I'm a bit surprised that Contact didn't make the list...

Jason
 

Zen Butler

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Messages
5,568
Location
Southern, Ca
Real Name
Zen K. Butler
Contact is certainly worthy

some others, only opinion of course:

THX1138 ( I like this better than his other films)
Star Trek: First Contact (sorry, love this one)
12 Monkeys
This Island Earth
Blue Sunshine
The Lathe of Heaven (PBS)- wouldn't qualify as it was aired on t.v. Still loved it.
 

Gary Seven

Grand Poo Pah
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
2,161
Location
Lake Worth, Florida
Real Name
Gaston
Interesting how Star Wars made it as I've never considered it sci fi, more like romance-fantasy. Just because it's set in space does not make it sci fi.

I'm also surprised the original "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" didn't make it.
 

Rob Gardiner

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
2,950
I'm surprised no David Cronenberg made the list. While it is not generally classified as "sci-fi", few films explore the relationship between mankind and technology as thought
fully as Crash.
 

jian

Agent
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
28
Interesting list. I am rather surprised their #1 is Blade Runner. I would've guess 2001 would've been on their top. No Star Trek movies?
 

Daniel J.S.

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
220
I feel I must protest the disparaging remarks about Tarkovsky's Solaris: it may be glacially slow paced but I find it anything but boring. The pacing gives us time to ruminate on what we are seeing; this film doesn't rely on considering meaning after the fact (although this occurs as well). Our interpretations are formed as we watch. The scenes on Earth convey a sense of utter emotional devastation and while the scenes on the station may not contain suspense as we would define it, there is a persistent sense of unease throughout. I also find "Hari"'s arc as she gradually realizes what she is and what her feelings are and her effect on Kris to be very involving. Her sacrifice for him at the end is actually quite touching. While it's not on the level of 2001, it is a worthwhile consideration of the nature of reality and love and humanities relationship with technology and the natural world.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,016
Messages
5,128,511
Members
144,242
Latest member
acinstallation921
Recent bookmarks
0
Top