- Joined
- Jul 3, 1997
- Messages
- 69,910
- Real Name
- Ronald Epstein
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well this is going to create additional conversations concerning the Paramount Presents title choices.![]()
Friday The 13th on UHD and Back To The Beach on Blu-ray? Paramount keeps knocking 'em out of the park, baby!
Also, for the record, I know I'm in the minority and neither this or F13 are particularly good.Yes! For the record, I may have negative remarks about the way they are marketing these titles but I HIGHLY commend them for doing a great job of combing their catalog and going after smaller titles. They have been releasing a nice handful of "A" and "B" releases each month.
Dare I say, it works because it's smart enough to be clever and dumb enough to be fun. It would not be out of line in a triple feature with the likes of UHF and Gremlins 2, which are also movies I love.Wow, "The best movie of its kind since GREASE."
The boys loved it. Thanks for that clip!
I'm glad to hear that because I still love the old Beach Party movies but was afraid that this wasn't good.Well, I for one, am excited about this! Everyone is in on the joke and it's an affectionate send up of the Beach Party movies.
Well, it will be wonderful to see Annette again. Back in the day I had all her 45s and 33s.
Now I have several CD sets. Yes, I do actually play them once in a while.
Yeah, add to this the To Catch A Thief flub, and lopping off extra features from the aforementioned Paramount Presents reissue, also Fatal Attraction, and Flashdance, plus releasing Best Picture winner, The Greatest Show on Earth without a full-blown restoration, leaving in the cue marks and residual dirt, with ZERO extra features, and, well, Paramount Presents is pretty much a line-up put out by someone who hasn't a clue what their asset management is like. Did anyone mention The Golden Child was also a Paramount presents release. Yuck!Yeah, I have already resigned myself to the fact that Paramount Presents! has nothing to do with their more prestigious line of releases. Elizabethtown was questionable. Rough Cut blew up any integrity that moniker could have had. Back To The Beach is just following up in the mud.
I would love to know what qualifies a film for Paramount Presents! over a normal release because I would hate to think that someone at the studio thinks this title rises to the cream of their crop.
Yeah, add to this the To Catch A Thief flub, and lopping off extra features from the aforementioned Paramount Presents reissue, also Fatal Attraction, and Flashdance, plus releasing Best Picture winner, The Greatest Show on Earth without a full-blown restoration, leaving in the cue marks and residual dirt, with ZERO extra features, and, well, Paramount Presents is pretty much a line-up put out by someone who hasn't a clue what their asset management is like. Did anyone mention The Golden Child was also a Paramount presents release. Yuck!
Agreed. Very sad. Very sad, indeed.Based on Paramount farming out their titles to Kino, I suspect that making the decision to finally release their catalog on Blu-ray after all these years hasn't been a rousing success for the studio. In that case, I can understand (though I don't agree) the lack of money being put into restoring these titles for release.
I don't know how Warner does it in comparison. They put a lot of money and effort into their library of releases and quite frankly, I don't know how much better they are selling.
I think the bottom line here is that disc media has been in decline for over a decade. Some studios are still doing top-notch restorations. Other studios are just putting out what they have with minimal touch-ups. And one studio has just stopped releasing catalog titles altogether.
It's better than the old Beach party movies, in my opinion. They were fun became they were thrown together, so it created a kind of informal ambience which was pleasant, like being at a dinner theater with a lot of acts on the bill. You didn't mind that some of it didn't work, for there was always something else that might. Plus you were there to see Annette. And the guest stars, like Buster Keaton or Paul Frees, were diverting. This is more or less the same, but has a bigger budget. The waves shimmer and shine. Also, it has more of a through line. It holds together better. It has a warmth and humor that's attractive. And Annette is simply wonderful, even better and more charismatic then she was as a teen. She has such style, poise and presence. She's also in on the joke and very funny. If you like her, you have to see this film. Whenever she's on the screen, all's well with the world. Frankie, unfortunately, is paunchy, and straining for effect. The film sags a bit in the third act, but then so did the original Beach Party movies. Besides, any movie that has Pee Wee Herman performing "Surfin' Bird" can't be all bad.I'm glad to hear that because I still love the old Beach Party movies but was afraid that this wasn't good.