rdimucci
Second Unit
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2007
- Messages
- 267
- Real Name
- Robert DiMucci
I had the same problem, until I started using a pair of clip-ons.I wear glasses and have to wear 3D glasses over glasses. So, just not for me.
https://****/39FcQRO
I had the same problem, until I started using a pair of clip-ons.I wear glasses and have to wear 3D glasses over glasses. So, just not for me.
I guess it's different for each person. I wear glasses and have no problem with the 3D glasses oner my glasses .I had the same problem, until I started using a pair of clip-ons.
https://****/39FcQRO
Creature from the Black Lagoon 2 was in 3D. It was titled Revenge of the Creature (1955) and it had cool 3D filmed at Marineland of Florida oceanarium to great effect.Not interested until we get Creature from the Black Lagoon 2 in 3D.
Way to go. If another 3D film was never put on disc, there are still plenty of fine 3D films to watch. I envy you when you watch 3D on a big screen.In conclusion, my mind is made up. I'm not letting go of 3D and I'm serious enough about it to spring for the Sony 7000 or JVC NZ7. Now I just have to allocate the funds.
In conclusion, my mind is made up. I'm not letting go of 3D
John, let me say this. I actually did come to the bridge of letting go of 3D as I finally purchased the Epson LS12000 (won't receive it until July, grumble, grumble) and here's the reason I decided I could do that. I've never been 100% happy with active-shutter technology (even on my Epson 5040UB) as it has never achieved the perfect opposite eye light blocking that polarized lenses do. Even though ghosting was minimal it was still there. So since I really wasn't happy with active-shutter technology in general, I am willing to lose it until they come up with something better that can actually replicate the 3D experience you can get in theaters.I think I'll share this both here and in the relevant projector thread.
I'm preparing for what needs to be my last projector upgrade so that I can fully retire without the cloud of another huge HT expense looming over my head at some point. Got the speakers, [for the most part] got the subs and I've got the screen. I may want another Pre/Pro at some point but that's for another thread and another time. I also realize there will always be some expense. I'm just trying to cover the big ones.
I love my Epson 6050 but, for several reasons, my final projector needs to be laser based. When the Epson LS12000 was announced I thought I might have found the 6050's replacement and at an acceptable price but alas, no 3D, something you've been able to take for granted in Epson projectors for many years now!
With the next realistic contender costing more than double the LS12000's already hefty price I knew it was time for me to have a reckoning of sorts with 3D. It had been so long since I'd even used the feature that I needed to order new sets of glasses. They arrived yesterday and I popped in one of my favorites, Tron Legacy. My wife isn't usually big into watching films in the Theater room but she was all in for this showing. For me, properly done of course, 3D adds a whole new, well, "dimension" that elevates the overall experience all that much more. This is especially true in a light-controlled room and on a large screen. Tomorrow I'll probably be watching Gravity, another favorite.
In conclusion, my mind is made up. I'm not letting go of 3D and I'm serious enough about it to spring for the Sony 7000 or JVC NZ7. Now I just have to allocate the funds.
I can totally understand your position. Believe me, I wanted soooo much to love the LS12000, buy it and be done. I even considered holding onto my 6050 for occasional 3D viewing. Epson is a brand I'm both familiar and comfortable with, plus I know it will work with my existing ceiling mount. It checks off a lot of important boxes. While I'm sure they had good reasons to make the design choices they did with the LS12000 [the Sony 6000 also lacks 3D support] given the price tags on the JVC NZ7 and Sony 7000, you'd think there might be room in the marketplace for a higher priced competing model from Epson. Maybe next year?So since I really wasn't happy with active-shutter technology in general, I am willing to lose it until they come up with something better that can actually replicate the 3D experience you can get in theaters.
That's another reason I'm choosing to deal with this sooner than later. I'm also planning to start building up my collection.That’s ultimately how I feel as well - hopefully price won’t become an insurmountable issue down the road.
Ah, OK, you got me there. I guess what I meant was - hopefully a new 3D craze will mean a new Creature film.Creature from the Black Lagoon 2 was in 3D. It was titled Revenge of the Creature (1955) and it had cool 3D filmed at Marineland of Florida oceanarium to great effect. View attachment 139389
I guess you haven't experienced active shutter 3D technology on any of the JVC NZ line. Absolutely no ghosting whatsoever. Combined with the high laser setting this yields the best 3D I have ever seen in my HT.I've never been 100% happy with active-shutter technology (even on my Epson 5040UB) as it has never achieved the perfect opposite eye light blocking that polarized lenses do. Even though ghosting was minimal it was still there. So since I really wasn't happy with active-shutter technology in general, I am willing to lose it until they come up with something better that can actually replicate the 3D experience you can get in theaters.
So, You're telling me I gotta break out the A-1 Steak Sauce. : (-I honestly don’t see this year as being much different than any of the recent previous years. Theatrically, all of the Marvel Studios produced films have continued to receive 3D releases - Doctor Strange 2 wasn’t an anomaly in that regard. Many CGI animated children’s films continue to receive 3D releases. High budget tentpoles continue to receive 3D releases. They’re simply not as widespread as they used to be.
2020 was somewhat of an anomaly due to the pandemic, but in 2021, there were at least the following 3D releases theatrically in the U.S.:
-Raya and the Last Dragon
-Godzilla vs. Kong
-The Boss Baby: Family Business
-Black Widow
-Jungle Cruise
-Free Guy
-Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings
-Venom: Let There Be Carnage
-The Addams Family 2
-No Time To Die
-Dune
-Ron’s Gone Wrong
-Eternals
-Encanto
-Spider-Man: No Way Home
-Sing 2
Most of those films were successful, some massively so. They’re not moving the needle on 3D acceptance. The people that like it already like it, and the people who don’t like it continue not to like it. I think the 3D versions of top grossing titles like the Marvel Studios films garner enough box office (especially worldwide) to make their continued 3D release likely for the coming years.
I think the pattern we’ve settled into is basically where things will remain - a selection of the biggest films each year will be released in a variety of formats, of which 3D is one. Because the 3D showings attract a smaller crowd, they will in many instances be scheduled at less popular times of the day. While this may be inconvenient for enthusiasts like us, it allows it to remain sustainably by not booking shows in 3D that don’t sell at times when there is major demand for 2D showings.
It is what it is at this point. I don’t think it’s dead but I don’t think a Renaissance is around the corner either. And I think that’s ok. As long as we get to see them, what difference does it make that our preferences are different from that of the general public?
I basically agree but I do think the Avatar sequel will have as big of a push for 3-D as any movie has had since maybe the first one. I expect Cameron will want the marketing to focus on the 3-D like it's a star of the movie and that will help bolster this movie's 3-D ticket sales. That being said, I don't really expect that to have any effect on 3-D beyond that one movie.I honestly don’t see this year as being much different than any of the recent previous years.
It was a perfect storm of idiocy that killed 3D. First, they charged more for it, second, they didn’t use it completely (no forward projection). Hollywood didn’t charge more when widescreen or stereo was introduced. Then for the home market the movie that is the “killer app” to borrow a phrase, Avatar, you can’t have it. Néener, neener. Oh, ok we’ll let you have if it you buy a Panasonic TV or blu ray player. How stupid and greedy can you be. And then finally there a hefty premium to buy the 3D discs themselves, more greed.It is my opinion that digital construction of 3D is the reason it was a failure. If production companies flood the market with cheaply made 3D conversion it will fail again.