Anyone else think the movie BLOW with Johnny Depp is really good?

Discussion in 'Movies' started by todd stone, Apr 10, 2003.

  1. todd stone

    todd stone Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    1,760
    Likes Received:
    0
    I haven't watched this one in awhile and decided to throw it on. Sure, we may not feel too much sympathy for the man who dealt the largest amount of cocaine to many people in his lifetime, but not everyone in the world is perfect and the moments where you realize his connection loss with his daughter, really left me sad at the end of the movie.

    The orchestral music along with these moments was perfect.


    Johnny Depp, another terrific actor of our time.
     
  2. Bruce Hedtke

    Bruce Hedtke Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 1999
    Messages:
    2,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought it was very watchable but the director was definitely in love with his subject.

    Bruce
     
  3. Alex Spindler

    Alex Spindler Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2000
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought it was rather good. Excellent cast for the most part, but Depp was especially good. I actually felt quite sorry for the decline they showed in the film. Great use of period music as well as great costumes.
     
  4. Joshua_Y

    Joshua_Y Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought it was just excellent...great cinemtography...wonderful actors...characters with depth...whats not to like?
     
  5. Dean DeMass

    Dean DeMass Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Depp is one of my favorite actors. Blow was a very good film. Paul Reubens did a damn good job as well. My only problem with the film was Penelope Cruz. i am just not a fan of hers. That voice gets on my nerves.

    -Dean-
     
  6. LennyP

    LennyP Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's up there for me below Scarface, Goodfellas, Boogie Nights, etc, an excellent movie and a loaded disc!
     
  7. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,998
    Likes Received:
    0
    I despise this film. Bearing the same narrative template as Goodfellas/Casino, but without one whit of soul or artistry, it's completely by-the-numbers and completely boring, one of the stiffest and least compelling gangster tale yet offered by any of the Marty-lites that have been polluting the theaters with their bland, derivative retreads in the past decade. Flat, uninspired, and thoroughly hokey, this is the Battlefield Earth of Scorsese ripoffs.

    First the small stuff: Ray Liotta, who plays George Jung's (Dep's) father and unfortunately serves as a constant reminder of a much better film, looks more like Jung's brother in the early scenes. In one scene, he even manages to look like Jung's younger brother. Until, that is, the horrendous age makeup is applied... and this is easily the worst makeup I've seen since the awful For the Boys. Ray Liotta's old man look is simply ridiculous. But it doesn't even come close to the absurd "fatpack" that Dep wears throughout the final scenes. Same skinny ass and bony face, but he looks like he's wearing a quarterback's flakjacket or an overstuffed fannypack underneath his billowy button-up. There's simply nothing at all convincing about it. The shot of him walking with his daughter had us rolling. In that scene, the film finally went from excruciatingly awful to hilariously so... and Dep's presence then recalled thoughts of the master-hack, Ed Wood.

    And I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that the otherwise wonderful Rachel Griffith's portrayal as Jung's mother is one of the single worst performances I've ever seen. Completely unbearable.

    And we haven't even discussed the most despicable lies this film tells. Referring to the real facts of Jung's life as detailed in the book upon which the film was very loosely based, Slate's reviewer, David Edelstein, writes:
     
  8. Alex Spindler

    Alex Spindler Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2000
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    I may be looking too far into this, but I don't think Rich liked the movie. [​IMG]

    An interesting counterpoint. I don't hold the film to being accurate in the least, but your points regarding the final text is entirely valid. Regardless of how accurate the film is, it does break a boundary by including a living person in a manner that could be considered accusatory.

    However, I took it to be a negative towards George in the sense that he had disappointed his daughter just as he was making headway into her life. I didn't take her lack of meeting him to be a negative strike towards her, but rather that she had learned well to no longer waste her time with her father.

    But, as I said, a good counterpoint.
     
  9. Robert_eb

    Robert_eb Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]


    Rich is absolutely correct in every point that he made as not being true to what actually happened.

    Unlike Rich, I enjoyed the film, but I looked at it as a work of fiction, as most of the facts in the film are incorrect as Rich has described.
     
  10. chung_sotheby

    chung_sotheby Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2002
    Messages:
    857
    Likes Received:
    0
    While I thought that the movie had some decent points, I have to say that all in all it was a huge dissapointment. The trailer was one of the most brilliant pieces of 3-minute cinema I have ever seen, and the story of the man who introduced cocaine to the US is very compelling, but too much of the movie itself was thematically and stylistically copied from other great movies. I thought that the pace of the film, the camera work, and the narrative arc were all completely mismanaged and jumbled. Case in point, the California Beach part where Demme uses some of the old 60's and 70's moving zoom tricks got very old very soon, while in no way lending creedance to what the whole section of the story was about. Also, the whole introduction to cocaine in the jail cell scene between Diego and George was a straight ripoff of a scene in Fight Club, and the fading in and out, as well as some of the other camera work and music, were completely unnecessary and inappropriate for what the scene was trying to accomplish. I think that it is ok to copy other filmmakers just as long as you can inegrate and use in such a way that it creates your own style (a la PT Anderson and Wes Anderson), copying for the sake of copying just further illuminates how ill-equipped you are as a director. I liked some of Demme's earlier films (Beautiful Girls, The Ref), but it seems that with Blow he just tried so hard to make it into a Scorcese picture that he instead made it look like a bad, SNL-type parody of a Scorcese flick.
     
  11. todd stone

    todd stone Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    1,760
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  12. Chris_Richard

    Chris_Richard Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2001
    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wasn't too fond of the film either. I forgot, until Chung mentioned, how great that trailer was. Boy was I looking forward to it. Instead it was a nicely acted piece that constantly reminded me of better Scorsese or P.T. Anderson films.
     

Share This Page