The owners shouldn't have to and the players should not be making requests like that. They are employees of the owner. The owner is in effect their CEO. Unless the team is publicly traded on the stock market they don't have to reveal anything.As long as the owners don't open their books, I don't know why anyone should believe their cries of poverty. That said, it's kind of difficult to sympathize with either side.
If MLB wants to fix their financial and competitive balance problems, they should use the NFL as a model.This assumes the presence of financial and competitive balance problems. And the sky ain't falling. As I said before, if the finances were so bad, Donald Watkins would own the Twins, Angels, Expos, or some other team he's expressed interest in, because the current owners would want out. But, gee, despite how "bad" the situation is, and despite there being willing buyers, these guys continue to hold on to their teams. Is it because they think the situation will get better (despite their commissioner's anti-marketing and their current 0-8 record in labor negoriations) or because they're lying about how dire the situation is?
As to the competitive balance thing, it isn't nearly as bad as it appears. The NFL has the illusion of competitive balance because the season is short enough for random variance to play hell with it, and a greater percentage of teams make it to the playoffs. Make 'em play a statistically significant amount of games and only let the division winners in the playoffs, and see how "balanced" it is.
Instead of all of the players going on strike, how about if just the Yankees go on strike?That would be baseball suicide. The Yankees provide more funding and revenue for sharing than any other sports franchise in all pro sports.
Kirk would be in the corner snogging the batgirl.
Nah, he wouldn't stop with just her.
I'm tired of fans of losing teams blaming the Yankees for their team plightThe truth often hurts...