What's new

Anthem AVM 70 - Initial Impressions (1 Viewer)

John Dirk

Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2000
Messages
6,742
Location
ATL
Real Name
JOHN
Congratulations, John! With my HT disassembled because of my parents moving in with us, I’m particularly jealous when people can get awesome gear to improve their HT.

I am humbled and inspired by the sacrifice you are making for your parents. The Bible teaches us to honor them and I can't think of a better way to do so.
 

DaveF

Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
28,751
Location
Catfisch Cinema
Real Name
Dave
After this the update took about 20 minutes to complete and I was finally able to run ARC Genesis.

Coming from the Audyssey camp, I wasn't really ready for the power of ARC Genesis. The best way I can describe it is, it appears they designed a room correction system around the very popular Room EQ Wizard software. Those familiar with this amazing tool should have no trouble with ARC Genesis. Instead of making mostly obscured adjustments and allowing the user little to no control over them, ARC shows you exactly what it is doing to your system and allows you to compare before and after curves along with their own target curve. It's exactly what a true enthusiast would expect.

I only had time to complete a single session with ARC Genesis, which now includes independent phase and time alignment of two subs but the difference was pronounced and easily discerned. My first thought upon playing a few of my favorite musical selections was "are the subs engaged?" My Legacy Focus SE's can go plenty deep so I had to check. Turns out they were indeed but are now so well integrated as to not call attention to themselves. I boosted the bass a bit and sure enough, they came to life.

I haven't yet had time to sample any film content aside from a brief spin up of the original [and best, IMO] Marvel title, "Thor." The channel separation and dynamics I heard in the brief session I took in was nothing short of breathtaking. I can't wait to dig a little deeper into my film and music collections.
The Sandlot Youre Killing Me Smalls GIF
 

John Dirk

Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2000
Messages
6,742
Location
ATL
Real Name
JOHN
This is a reference I've seen tossed about here and there for quite some time. I've come across it on t-shirts as well yet, even after viewing the related clip, it's commonly accepted interpretation escapes me. I thought I was going to get through the remainder of my life secretly not understanding it but, you got me! :cool: A little help, please?
 

Walter Kittel

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 28, 1998
Messages
9,800
It is from the 1993 film Sandlot and signals a certain level of exasperation. (I can't speak for Dave, but I think his reaction is due to you only sampling vs. actually getting a more immersive film experience.)

Congrats on the Anthem purchase, BTW. (Way out of my price range these days, but I still enjoy living vicariously through these threads. :) )

- Walter.
 

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
67,799
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
This is a reference I've seen tossed about here and there for quite some time. I've come across it on t-shirts as well yet, even after viewing the related clip, it's commonly accepted interpretation escapes me. I thought I was going to get through the remainder of my life secretly not understanding it but, you got me! :cool: A little help, please?
Wendy Peffercorn, hubba, hubba!
 

Edwin-S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
10,006
Why? Not criticizing, just asking. I thought I'd have the same opinion as one thing Denon/Marantz products get right in my view is the GUI and menu system. The AVM 70's GUI/menus will definitely take some getting used to so I'll probably continue to favor the web interface. Having easy web access in my HT from both my Galaxy Tab S [which acts as my universal remote] and my HTPC may be the reason it's a non-issue to me.

I just don't trust the permanence of anything web-based. I've had experience with web-based UIs in an industrial capacity. They worked fine until Flash was permanently disabled by Adobe in web browsers. The UIs stopped working because....well...they were all written using Flash.
 

ManW_TheUncool

His Own Fool
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Messages
11,947
Location
The BK
Real Name
ManW
I just don't trust the permanence of anything web-based. I've had experience with web-based UIs in an industrial capacity. They worked fine until Flash was permanently disabled by Adobe in web browsers. The UIs stopped working because....well...they were all written using Flash.

I have the previous gen AVM-60, so no web-browser-based UI, but... sounds like they're just going browser-based, not actually web-based per se... though yeah, future browser dev can still potentially break things or cause problems/inconveniences unless one makes sure to keep a legacy device/computer around just to handle that, if/when that ever happens.

Also, sounds like that's not supposed to be the only option although it's the one that allows most access (and probably greatest flexibility... and seemingly most functional) at least for now. Unfortunately, as good as Anthem seems to be w/ such stuff (vs many/most other CE makers nowadays), they still might not be quite that great at ensuring future UI compatibility and/or usability, avoiding/preventing future obsolescence, etc.

OTOH, I'm guessing that browser-based UI should (hopefully) be simple enough not to be easily (significantly) broken by future browser dev, so...

_Man_
 

John Dirk

Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2000
Messages
6,742
Location
ATL
Real Name
JOHN
I just don't trust the permanence of anything web-based. I've had experience with web-based UIs in an industrial capacity. They worked fine until Flash was permanently disabled by Adobe in web browsers. The UIs stopped working because....well...they were all written using Flash.
Definitely a fair point and one I hadn't considered. As an HTPC user, I prefer browser-based UI's as they are right there and easily accessible. Since its on my local network, I can even configure the AVM70 from my office system upstairs or view it's current settings there while researching, etc.

Being new to the Anthem world, I found the GUI/Menu system cumbersome compared to the straightforward, hierarchical Marantz approach but it does "appear" to allow full access once you become proficient enough. I also draw some comfort in knowing this could be totally revamped with a firmware update.
 

Edwin-S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
10,006
I have the previous gen AVM-60, so no web-browser-based UI, but... sounds like they're just going browser-based, not actually web-based per se... though yeah, future browser dev can still potentially break things or cause problems/inconveniences unless one makes sure to keep a legacy device/computer around just to handle that, if/when that ever happens.

Also, sounds like that's not supposed to be the only option although it's the one that allows most access (and probably greatest flexibility... and seemingly most functional) at least for now. Unfortunately, as good as Anthem seems to be w/ such stuff (vs many/most other CE makers nowadays), they still might not be quite that great at ensuring future UI compatibility and/or usability, avoiding/preventing future obsolescence, etc.

OTOH, I'm guessing that browser-based UI should (hopefully) be simple enough not to be easily (significantly) broken by future browser dev, so...

_Man_
Sorry. After reading your reply, I should correct myself. The UIs were browser based, not web enabled. You would sign in by opening IE and entering an IP and password. They broke because Flash was permanently disabled.

A web-enabled browser UI would probably be fine as long as the manufacturer stayed in business and was committed to maintaining the UI when the equipment became legacy gear.

Still, my experience with browser-based stuff makes me leery of browser-based or web-enabled interfaces; however, I cannot deny their ease of use versus a lot of hardware-based interfaces which manufacturers appear to make as unintuitive as possible. Rotel comes to mind when I think of shitty UIs on their receivers.
 

John Dirk

Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2000
Messages
6,742
Location
ATL
Real Name
JOHN
The UIs were browser based, not web enabled. You would sign in by opening IE and entering an IP and password. They broke because Flash was permanently disabled.
There are plenty of easy workarounds for Adobe Flash but your general point is still valid.
 

John Dirk

Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2000
Messages
6,742
Location
ATL
Real Name
JOHN
It is from the 1993 film Sandlot and signals a certain level of exasperation. (I can't speak for Dave, but I think his reaction is due to you only sampling vs. actually getting a more immersive film experience.)

Congrats on the Anthem purchase, BTW. (Way out of my price range these days, but I still enjoy living vicariously through these threads. :) )

- Walter.
Ah! Quite possibly so. I exasperate lots of people. "I have a particular set of skills." :cool:

Dave's a busy guy too so I know he appreciates how these things go.
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
18,928
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
Regarding the browser based control, I don't think it's a big deal. It's actually not web based at all. It's just that the processor has a software "web site" included in its firmware, which devices connect to directly through your local network. My WiFi routers work exactly the same way. It seems like a rather common method of device control these days. Personally, I think it's preferable to using mobile apps.
 

DaveF

Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
28,751
Location
Catfisch Cinema
Real Name
Dave
Regarding the browser based control, I don't think it's a big deal. It's actually not web based at all. It's just that the processor has a software "web site" included in its firmware, which devices connect to directly through your local network. My WiFi routers work exactly the same way. It seems like a rather common method of device control these days. Personally, I think it's preferable to using mobile apps.
Thanks. I don't think understood this is the device itself serving up HTML pages. My Marantz does this. My Triad sub amplifiers do this. HTML isn't going anywhere. Completely different beast from a cloud UI or a Flash interfae.
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
18,928
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
Thanks. I don't think understood this is the device itself serving up HTML pages. My Marantz does this. My Triad sub amplifiers do this. HTML isn't going anywhere. Completely different beast from a cloud UI or a Flash interfae.
Maybe @John Dirk can verify, but I thought any time you're entering an IP address in a browser to access an interface, that's what's going on. The device has an HTML interface built into the firmware.
 

John Dirk

Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2000
Messages
6,742
Location
ATL
Real Name
JOHN
Maybe @John Dirk can verify, but I thought any time you're entering an IP address in a browser to access an interface, that's what's going on. The device has an HTML interface built into the firmware.
That is true but, if it's Flash based, then the browser used to access it would still need to be able to deal with that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,009
Messages
5,128,251
Members
144,228
Latest member
CoolMovies
Recent bookmarks
0
Top