After the first round she is only one over par. That is great as far as I'm concerned. I think that she can make the cut. Anyone that knows me knows that I say a lot of sexist things. However I'm rooting for this broad to show that the best woman's golfer can beat half of the men's golfers. Annika may never win a PGA event but it's stupid to think that a woman will never ever do it. If you pit the best male athlete in a sport against the best female then the male will win 99% of the time if strength and speed are a factor in the sport. Darts, pool, bowling and other non-physical "sports" do not count. The Billy Jean King v Bobby Riggs tennis match was not a true battle of the sexes because Bobby was just a male blowhard and not real representative of an elite male athlete. The Williams sisters might not be able to beat the top 20 male players but I bet they could do beat most of the male players lower than 100. I just don't understand why it upsets these pro golfers that Annika (or any female golfer) might be better than the worst PGA player. If these scrubs are allowed to play then why not allow the women who are better than these scrubs? Doesn't it raise the level of talent in the PGA overall? I feel this way about all sports. If a female athlete has the talent then let her play. I understand the need for a all women's league but not an all men's league.