Charles de Lauzirika
Insider
- Joined
- May 25, 2000
- Messages
- 268
- Real Name
- Charles de Lauzirika
Great thread! Just a few comments...
I know a lot of "Aliens" fans bemoan the way Hicks and Newt are quickly dispatched in "Alien 3's" opening credits. Personally, I think it's a very bold way to state, "All bets are off." If these two characters -- in whom we've invested an emotional bond -- can be killed off in the film's opening seconds, then who knows what to expect in this latest entry? I love that daring statement of unpredictability from the get-go. But think about it even more and you realize that their deaths are really for the best: The seriously-wounded Hicks is pretty much worthless for any further action on this planet...and what's Newt going to do the whole time? Shatter glass with her piercing scream? She doesn't know Fury 161 like the back of her hand, as she did with LV-426, so she becomes baggage for Ripley to drag along. Not to mention Newt's role would have to be re-cast, since Carrie Henn had aged about six years at that point.
Some people have mentioned the CG "shots" don't seem convincing. There is actually only one CG Alien shot in the entire film: The very quick shot of the Alien's head cracking before exploding at the end.
Everything else is either the Boss "mo-motion" rod puppet or Tom Woodruff-in-a-suit.
I remember seeing "Alien 3" opening day at the Avco Theater in Westwood. The first thing I thought as the lights came up at the end was, "Gee...too bad Fincher's never going to work again." I thought his direction and overall style were brilliant -- but that his vision was not going to be appreciated by the masses. I'm so glad to have been (eventually) proven wrong.
I know a lot of "Aliens" fans bemoan the way Hicks and Newt are quickly dispatched in "Alien 3's" opening credits. Personally, I think it's a very bold way to state, "All bets are off." If these two characters -- in whom we've invested an emotional bond -- can be killed off in the film's opening seconds, then who knows what to expect in this latest entry? I love that daring statement of unpredictability from the get-go. But think about it even more and you realize that their deaths are really for the best: The seriously-wounded Hicks is pretty much worthless for any further action on this planet...and what's Newt going to do the whole time? Shatter glass with her piercing scream? She doesn't know Fury 161 like the back of her hand, as she did with LV-426, so she becomes baggage for Ripley to drag along. Not to mention Newt's role would have to be re-cast, since Carrie Henn had aged about six years at that point.
Some people have mentioned the CG "shots" don't seem convincing. There is actually only one CG Alien shot in the entire film: The very quick shot of the Alien's head cracking before exploding at the end.
Everything else is either the Boss "mo-motion" rod puppet or Tom Woodruff-in-a-suit.
I remember seeing "Alien 3" opening day at the Avco Theater in Westwood. The first thing I thought as the lights came up at the end was, "Gee...too bad Fincher's never going to work again." I thought his direction and overall style were brilliant -- but that his vision was not going to be appreciated by the masses. I'm so glad to have been (eventually) proven wrong.