1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

"A Star Is Born" Garland in 6k resolution

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Danoldrati, May 23, 2008.

  1. Stanton Heck

    Stanton Heck Agent

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2006
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is no complete print. There is no collector that is holding out. If MR COLLECTOR IS a film lover then he should send the footage to Warner Brothers so generations to come can enjoy the complete version! If he doesn't turn the footage over to Warner Brothers then the movie will die with him! I highly doubt a complete print is out there! It would of turned up by now. Also any 16mm print that was made for A STAR IS BORN will be the short version.
     
  2. felipenor

    felipenor Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is it expected to be released this year?
     
  3. Simon Howson

    Simon Howson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Last year's Warner Home Video Chat:

    http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/032409htfchat.html

    HOWEVER that date is tentative. Warner also said there would be international postage for Warner Archive, and that Film Noir 5 would be released late last year, but neither of those things happened.
     
  4. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    Wasn't there a PR report during the fall that stated, alongside with the success of the Warner Archive program, that said that A Star is Born will be released on Blu-ray, with both the original and the remake?
     
  5. Simon Howson

    Simon Howson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think you mean Barry Maxwell's column. A bunch of release dates were released by Warner France. Who knows if that relates to the U.S. date:

    http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/barriemaxwell/maxwell112509b.html
     
  6. Mark Zimmer

    Mark Zimmer Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    4,305
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    The collector would also be an idiot. The studio not knowing what the left hand is doing would probably destroy it as an illegal print. And there's always the instructive object lesson of THE ALAMO turning up in a beautiful roadshow print only to be improperly stored by the studio and allowed to turn to vinegar. Collectors don't trust the studios to take care of their assets, with good reason.
     
  7. Patrick Mason

    Patrick Mason Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Real Name:
    Patrick
    Haven't had a chance to watch it yet, but A Star Is Born has appeared on Netflix's streaming service in HD. Could this be the new restoration?
     
  8. Garysb

    Garysb Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    Messages:
    2,885
    Likes Received:
    1,232
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    I doubt it since Warner Bros. is saving the new restoration to premiere at the Turner Classic Film Festival. A hi def version of the film has also recently been shown on HDNET. It looked good but I assumed it was from an existing source. It started with the dedication to film preservation that is on the current DVD.
     
  9. Jack Theakston

    Jack Theakston Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Messages:
    909
    Likes Received:
    284
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    New York
    Real Name:
    Jack Theakston
    I don't think this would be the case. WB would be happy to obtain and preserve the missing footage, and I'm sure they'd take good care of it.

    THE ALAMO situation was the exception to the rule. The print went vinegar because it was treated with a scratch removal process that ended up chemically destroying the base of the film, not because of inadequate storage.

    By the way, for whatever it's worth, the story goes that this certain collector salvaged the film out of a garbage dumpster at WB, making the print quite legitimately the collector's.
     
  10. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    4,907
    Likes Received:
    2,248
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    They list Dial M For Murder on Blu-ray in June. I guess this will be released again when the Blu-ray 3D version comes out?
     
  11. ahollis

    ahollis Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    7,530
    Likes Received:
    3,030
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    I doubt we will hear in firm news on A STAR IS BORN release until after the premiere at TCM Film Festival this spring. It will more than likely come out during the presentation and hit the reviews of the restored film in digital.
     
  12. Jack Theakston

    Jack Theakston Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Messages:
    909
    Likes Received:
    284
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    New York
    Real Name:
    Jack Theakston
    That is for a French release, I believe. There's nothing on the boards right now for a domestic BD, I'm told.
     
  13. Jeffrey Nelson

    Jeffrey Nelson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Real Name:
    Jeffrey Nelson
    I can't get excited over a new restoration of A STAR IS BORN unless the missing footage has been reinstated.
     
  14. Simon Howson

    Simon Howson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And the Born in a Trunk number is omitted, which was added to the film after Cukor finished it, and it wasn't even directed by Cukor.
     
  15. Brandon_D

    Brandon_D Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It may not have been directed by Cukor, but its an absolute masterpiece of Judy Garland's career. It must be there.
     
  16. Simon Howson

    Simon Howson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I guess it depends on if it is going to be a director's cut or not, because if it is, it shouldn't be in the film.
     
  17. Rob_Ray

    Rob_Ray Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    1,506
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Southern California
    Real Name:
    Rob Ray

    It's impossible to create a "director's cut" of this film as the director has been gone for nearly 27 years. Cukor has gone on record as saying that he could have eliminated 25 minutes or more from the film with indetectable cuts that no one would have noticed. And he was right. The film as it is plays like a rough first cut, especially the opening sequence which contains a lot of redundant shots and overlong shots that belabor the points being made. But Cukor never had the chance to make the editorial decisions that a "director's cut" would require, so it is what it is, missing segments notwithstanding.

    And nobody's going to delete "Born in a Trunk" which is one of Garland's finest moments on film regardless of who directed it.
     
  18. ahollis

    ahollis Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    7,530
    Likes Received:
    3,030
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    While George Cukor directed it, it was a Jack Warner film from the beginning and was the one that actually cut the film in the end. I'm with you on the "Born In A Trunk" number. It was a part of the film for the start and should stay. I don't understand the controversy about the song being in the film
     
  19. Robin9

    Robin9 Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,954
    Likes Received:
    2,921
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Robin
    The "controversy" originated with George Cukor telling interviewers that he thought inserting the number was a mistake which unbalanced the movie. For example in Cukor by Carlos Clarens (Secker & Warburg, 1976, SBN 436 09942 X) Cukor says The picture was mangled after the premier. They thought it was over-long, which it probably was, except that everything was in the right place. So they cut important scenes to make room for the endless "Born In A Trunk" number, which I did not direct - it was put together by the art director and the choreographer - and they removed "Lose That Long Face" which was essential to the scene with Bickford in her dressing room.

    The ideal situation would be for Warners to make peace with that collector and then to issue on a Special Edition Blu-ray two versions of the movie: George Cukor's version without "Born In A Trunk" and also Jack Warners' version with the number included.
     
  20. ahollis

    ahollis Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    7,530
    Likes Received:
    3,030
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    Thanks for the explanation. I am not sure that I agree that it should be deleted since it was in the film for most of it's release history, I can understand why some people are dedicated to an original Cukor version, but unless he made notes as Orson Wells did, then I not sure we will get his vision.
     

Share This Page