Howard Tom
Agent
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Messages
- 44
- Real Name
- Howard Tom
This was one film I've come across a few times on TV, though not during its original theatrical run. And each time I've seen it, there always seems to be something a little different about how it is presented. To summarize:
1) the first time I saw it was on a local channel as a late night movie, I think. There the first part was in B/W, the second in color, a battered B/W trailer in between. The B/W part of the feature was as clean as a new B/W film, though.
2) a couple of years later, it aired locally in a french dubbed version. There, both parts were in color (not the trailer, though) and very clean. The trailer is still "worn".
3) the last time I saw it, it opened with an intro by George Burns, which was not there the first time I saw it (but I was aware it was in the theatrical version, and I came in late seeing it the second time). But most interestingly, not only was the first part in B/W, but it was as worn and tinny as the trailer.
I suppose what I'd like to ask is, exactly how was it presented in the theater? I suspect 3) but I also wonder why more than one different version is floating out there in package "prints" for TV...
1) the first time I saw it was on a local channel as a late night movie, I think. There the first part was in B/W, the second in color, a battered B/W trailer in between. The B/W part of the feature was as clean as a new B/W film, though.
2) a couple of years later, it aired locally in a french dubbed version. There, both parts were in color (not the trailer, though) and very clean. The trailer is still "worn".
3) the last time I saw it, it opened with an intro by George Burns, which was not there the first time I saw it (but I was aware it was in the theatrical version, and I came in late seeing it the second time). But most interestingly, not only was the first part in B/W, but it was as worn and tinny as the trailer.
I suppose what I'd like to ask is, exactly how was it presented in the theater? I suspect 3) but I also wonder why more than one different version is floating out there in package "prints" for TV...