willyTass
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 996
Look how they massacred my boy
J/K
4k vs 2008 blu
J/K
4k vs 2008 blu
You could join the diplomatic corps!Important points that should not be lost in this discussion.
My introduction to the films was in 1972 and 1974, via dye transfer prints projected on large screens.
Mr. Willis’ cinematographic design and intent, in concert with Mr. Coppola’s vision were intense, obvious and magnificent. The grain structure and amount of filtration, especially in the old New York sequences, created imagery among the most beautiful ever to hit the silver sheet.
50 years later, with different audiences attuned to different programming, that original look might have viewers wondering if something is wrong, as opposed to understanding the art of the cinema.
My objective in 2007, under the supervision of Mr. Willis, and with Mr. Daviau seated beside me, was to accurately translate the appearance of metal dyes into digital dyes.
We succeeded.
But it must also be understood that motion pictures (art aside) are a business, and business must be willing to bend to the current desires of the public if it to be financially successful.
Personally, while my preference (and heart) remain with the original look (color as well as grain structure), I also want new audiences to experience and appreciate these films - and if it takes a certain neutralization of the palette and digital adaptation of grain to bring in those audiences, then it is something against which we cannot argue.
Bottom line - a few digital anomalies aside - the new look and texture is not only easily accepted by many older viewers, but will go completely beneath the radar for new viewers.
And most important - it has been approved by Mr. Coppola.
err... Paramount could hold a little 6.6yrs later and use that “66.6th Anniversary Edition” to sell that product... probably better as there would be some folks might dislike the “SickO Edition”...The jaded and pessimistic part of me thinks that studios make these slight changes to color, etc, so they can re-sell it to us for the 60th Anniversary with "Original Color Grading Restored"
Interesting. All of this has made me decide to just stick with the blu-rays.
I'm waiting for a comparative review between the 50th Anniversary Edition and the 2007 version to decide which to go to... to be frank i prefer colors that resonate the era of the story.Interesting. All of this has made me decide to just stick with the blu-rays.
They should totally get Dean Cundey to supervise the next transfer just for reaction sake.The jaded and pessimistic part of me thinks that studios make these slight changes to color, etc, so they can re-sell it to us for the 60th Anniversary with "Original Color Grading Restored"
I know something similar happened in Back To The Future 2.I’m trying to remember what relatively recent film this happened with - it was from the era when film prints were still being made but after most theaters had gone to the platter system. So maybe something within the last twenty years or so. One of the reels had a scene near the end that concluded with a fade or cut to black. Then, a new scene faded in, and then immediately after the start of the new scene, the reel change was meant to happen. But it wound up being problematic because many of the theaters assumed the fade to black was the end of the reel, and inadvertently cut out the very beginning of the next scene. I can’t remember which film it was but I remember seeing it a few times and depending on where I saw it, it was missing a portion of that scene.
wasn't the FHDBD and the UHDBD were sold as single format sets? and were packed in slim digipacks?I Got my Godfather Trilogy Today ! 4K UHD & Bluray's with Slipcases. My Vinyl & CD Soundtrack Collection...
Interesting. All of this has made me decide to just stick with the blu-rays.
......Though, if that video willyTass posted above is close to an accurate comparison, the color change does not seem offensively different to me......
Is this in reference to, at least in part, to the complete removal of the chroma grain? I've made a stink about it elsewhere, but it's fallen mostly on deaf ears. I've noticed it becoming more and more of a trend since 4K BD hit the market, and to say it upsets me is a bit of an understatement.Important points that should not be lost in this discussion.
My introduction to the films was in 1972 and 1974, via dye transfer prints projected on large screens.
Mr. Willis’ cinematographic design and intent, in concert with Mr. Coppola’s vision were intense, obvious and magnificent. The grain structure and amount of filtration, especially in the old New York sequences, created imagery among the most beautiful ever to hit the silver sheet.
50 years later, with different audiences attuned to different programming, that original look might have viewers wondering if something is wrong, as opposed to understanding the art of the cinema.
My objective in 2007, under the supervision of Mr. Willis, and with Mr. Daviau seated beside me, was to accurately translate the appearance of metal dyes into digital dyes.
We succeeded.
But it must also be understood that motion pictures (art aside) are a business, and business must be willing to bend to the current desires of the public if it to be financially successful.
Personally, while my preference (and heart) remain with the original look (color as well as grain structure), I also want new audiences to experience and appreciate these films - and if it takes a certain neutralization of the palette and digital adaptation of grain to bring in those audiences, then it is something against which we cannot argue.
Bottom line - a few digital anomalies aside - the new look and texture is not only easily accepted by many older viewers, but will go completely beneath the radar for new viewers.
And most important - it has been approved by Mr. Coppola.
Is this in reference to, at least in part, to the complete removal of the chroma grain? I've made a stink about it elsewhere, but it's fallen mostly on deaf ears. I've noticed it becoming more and more of a trend since 4K BD hit the market, and to say it upsets me is a bit of an understatement.
There are many who will agree with you.Is this in reference to, at least in part, to the complete removal of the chroma grain? I've made a stink about it elsewhere, but it's fallen mostly on deaf ears. I've noticed it becoming more and more of a trend since 4K BD hit the market, and to say it upsets me is a bit of an understatement.
Great plugin, I've used it for digital video and it works wonders. But obviously for film it belongs far far away. To be perfectly honest, I'm surprised to learn the film industry is using neatvideo. When I think of it, wedding videographers come to mind, not multimillion dollar productions.
I suppose, but time after time, it seems 99% of reviewers and hobbyists only notice grain removal when it's of the entire grain field, including the luma grain. Anytime the chroma grain is completely eradicated, I hear nothing but crickets.There are many who will agree with you.