What's new

A Few Words About A few words about...™ Strangers on a Train -- in Blu-ray (1 Viewer)

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
13,587
Real Name
Robert Harris
Alfred Hitchcock's Strangers on a Train is a classic, and it's nice to finally have it on Blu-ray.

The image harvest is decidedly okay. Nothing extraordinary, but nothing problematic. Main titles are a bit soft, and are window-boxed, without reason.

Blacks seems reasonable, with decent, but not wonderful shadow detail. Grain seems natural and consistent.

The preview version is in standard definition, and does not appear to be flagged for wide screen. Nothing new in special features, the most recent being M. Night chatting about fate or some such thing.

Great film.

Very nice, but not wonderful Blu-ray.

Image - 3.5 (preview version -1)

Audio - 3

RAH

Updated: Have taken another look at this, and upgraded to a 3.5 (which would have been a 4, had it not been window-boxed). There should be no concerns about purchasing this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

JohnS

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2001
Messages
4,957
Location
Las Vegas
Real Name
John Steffens
I'd like to own this. I will down the road.
At least it's decent enough to get us by.
Thanks RAH.
 

Brandon Conway

captveg
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Messages
9,373
Location
North Hollywood, CA
Real Name
Brandon Conway
Originally Posted by Robert Harris /t/324038/a-few-words-about-strangers-on-a-train-in-blu-ray#post_3980496
The preview version is in standard definition, and does not appear to be flagged for wide screen.

As with any 4:3 SD content on a Blu-ray, the player/monitor should properly add sidebars to the image to preserve the 4:3 presentation when watching on a 16:9 monitor.

Too bad it's in SD, though.
 

ShellOilJunior

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
219
I'm glad it appears to be acceptable. I just wish they put more effort into the release. I guess "film is film" to some...
 

haineshisway

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
4,889
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Bruce
I don't get it, frankly. Why would this and Dial M not receive the proper treatment? I don't need an "okay" version of Strangers on a Train - I have the DVD for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Matt Hough

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
22,686
Location
Charlotte, NC
Real Name
Matt Hough
haineshisway said:
I don't get it, frankly. Why would this and Dial M not receive the proper treatment? I don't need an "okay" version of Strangers on a Train - I have the DVD for that.
Exactly. The DVD is fine and even upconverts quite nicely. A Blu-ray should constitute a solid advance on that. Otherwise, why upgrade?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

David_B_K

Advanced Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
2,108
Location
Houston, TX
Real Name
David
Geez, it looks like I may be cancelling another Hitchcock pre-order. Shame, really. The first DVD I bought was Strangers on a Train.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
13,587
Real Name
Robert Harris
Updated: Have taken another look at this, and upgraded to a 3.5 (which would have been a 4, had it not been window-boxed). There should be no concerns about purchasing this one.

Unless the preview version no longer exists, which is possible (although it should have been duped), a 2k scan as a new extra would have been proper here. We're talking about a very minimal investment.

RAH
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Johnny Angell

Played With Dinosaurs Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 13, 1998
Messages
13,142
Location
Central Arkansas
Real Name
Johnny Angell
Ok, I'm not clear on what the preview version is. There is an HD version of the movie on this blu, isn't there? If that's ok, do I need to be concerned about the preview version?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
13,587
Real Name
Robert Harris
Originally Posted by Johnny Angell /t/324038/a-few-words-about-strangers-on-a-train-in-blu-ray#post_3980728
Ok, I'm not clear on what the preview version is. There is an HD version of the movie on this blu, isn't there? If that's ok, do I need to be concerned about the preview version?
Only if you have an interest in how films went from preview to final versions.

From matthewhunt.com

Strangers On A Train[COLOR= rgb(0, 0, 51)], one of Alfred Hitchcock's greatest films, was previewed in a form that's slightly different from the final release version. The preview version is sometimes mistakenly described as the British version, though the film's final American version was the only one shown on general release. [/COLOR]

[COLOR= rgb(0, 0, 51)]Hollywood studios routinely modify films after they are previewed, though the preview versions are seldom released commercially. [/COLOR]The Big Sleep[COLOR= rgb(0, 0, 51)], My Darling Clementine, and Blade Runner are notable exceptions.[/COLOR]

[COLOR= rgb(0, 0, 51)]There are relatively few differences between the two versions. One rather superfluous sequence from the preview - in which Bruno and Guy order food - was shortened in the final version, to reduce the overall running time. Also, the build-up to Guy entering Bruno's father's room is more suspenseful in the preview version: a brief additional sequence, with shadowy lighting and ominous music, misdirects the audience by implying that Guy actually intends to murder Bruno's father.[/COLOR]

[COLOR= rgb(0, 0, 51)]The film's ending represents the most significant alteration. The preview version ends rather blandly, with Guy's telephone call to his fiance; the final version inserted a new coda in which Guy is recognised by a vicar on a train, a more ironic and amusing ending.[/COLOR]
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

David_B_K

Advanced Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
2,108
Location
Houston, TX
Real Name
David
I'll keep my preorder on this one, as it is one of my favorite Hitchcock films. The windowboxed credits are not a deal breaker for me; and it's a nice price.
RAH, I thought the ending with the vicar was actually in the preview version, and that the phone call ending was the official release. I definitely like the vicar ending the best. Maybe I have them mixed up in my mind.
---EDIT---
Don't know why I got them mixed up. Took a look at the DVD last night.
 

mikeyhitchfan

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
530
Location
Costa Mesa CA
Real Name
Mike
Unless the preview version no longer exists, which is possible (although it should have been duped), a 2k scan as a new extra would have been proper here.  We're talking about a very minimal investment.
RAH
I have the preview version in HD from a TV broadcast, and it's looks quite nice. So, it does exist. I guess WB didn't think it was worth the effort. A great film at a great price. Can't wait!
 

Professor Echo

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
2,003
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Glen
Originally Posted by MattH. /t/324038/a-few-words-about-strangers-on-a-train-in-blu-ray#post_3980572
Exactly. The DVD is fine and even upconverts quite nicely. A Blu-ray should constitute a solid advance on that. Otherwise, why upgrade?
I agree with this, Matt. So many catalog titles are coming out now in Blu, it's getting to the point where I can't justify alleged upgrading on every title I already own in SD. I would much rather save my money for titles I don't already have or ones which represent a significant improvement over the SD.
 

David_B_K

Advanced Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
2,108
Location
Houston, TX
Real Name
David
Professor Echo said:
I agree with this, Matt. So many catalog titles are coming out now in Blu, it's getting to the point where I can't justify alleged upgrading on every title I already own in SD. I would much rather save my money for titles I don't already have or ones which represent a significant improvement over the SD.
When Blu-ray started, I said I would not rebuy my entire collection on Blu-ray. However, as my primary interest is in catalog titles, I seem to be doing precisely what I said I would not do. If I were to make a list of titles I most want on Blu-ray, I'd probably find that I already own them on DVD. If it's a title I never watch very often, I stand pat with the DVD. Certainly, I'll pass if it is not a significant upgrade. I was going to pass on this, but RAH now has it rated a '4' if you discount the windowboxed credits (which I will). For a significant Hitchcock film like this, it's a good enough price for me to upgrade to the Blu. I'm still going to pass on Dial 'M' until it has a better price or comes out in 2D only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Everett S.

Movie King (formally a projectionist)
Joined
Aug 24, 1998
Messages
739
Location
Wilmington,De
Real Name
Everett
David_B_K said:
When Blu-ray started, I said I would not rebuy my entire collection on Blu-ray. However, as my primary interest is in catalog titles, I seem to be doing precisely what I said I would not do. If I were to make a list of titles I most want on Blu-ray, I'd probably find that I already own them on DVD. If it's a title I never watch very often, I stand pat with the DVD. Certainly, I'll pass if it is not a significant upgrade. I was going to pass on this, but RAH now has it rated a '4' if you discount the windowboxed credits (which I will). For a significant Hitchcock film like this, it's a good enough price for me to upgrade to the Blu. I'm still going to pass on Dial 'M' until it has a better price or comes out in 2D only.
Same here.:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

ahollis

Premium
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
7,951
Location
New Orleans
Real Name
Allen
Originally Posted by Professor Echo /t/324038/a-few-words-about-strangers-on-a-train-in-blu-ray#post_3981023
I agree with this, Matt. So many catalog titles are coming out now in Blu, it's getting to the point where I can't justify alleged upgrading on every title I already own in SD. I would much rather save my money for titles I don't already have or ones which represent a significant improvement over the SD.
Another one that agrees. I have made the decision to pass on this one and DEAD RINGER. I want to support the release of classic titles on Blu-ray, but these past two quarters have been over whelming to the wallet.
 

Matthew Anderson

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 24, 2000
Messages
281
Location
Garland,Tx.
Real Name
Matthew Anderson
Thank you Mr. Harris for your review of this great Hitchcock film. It is one of my favorite Hitchcock titles and I always appreciate your honesty. Thanks also for your prior work on Lawrence of Arabia. I saw it on the big screen last Thursday night and it was good to see your name in the credits.
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,209
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
I agree that both versions should have been HD. If they would author with branching, it would probably take up less disc space to do than including the entire SD version version of the preview cut.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
345,998
Messages
4,762,862
Members
141,627
Latest member
Yllanes
Top