What's new

Blu-ray Review A Few Words About A few words about…™ Secret of the Incas – in Blu-ray (1 Viewer)

cineMANIAC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
2,440
Location
New York City
Real Name
Luis
I have the Imprint but I also picked up the domestic release, which I chaptered over to sample the PQ. I had not sampled the Imprint. Long shots have a soft focus but closeups and non-transition parts look fantastic. Very colorful and sharp. I love the slipcase the Imprint edition comes in so I'm torn over what to do with it but the disc is pretty much a coaster now.

This was a blind buy and I have not yet watched the film in it's entirety but it was blatantly obvious the Indiana Jones character owes its existence to Secret of the Incas - right down to the outfit both Heston and Ford wear. Both films came from Paramount so I presume Spielberg had no problem whatsoever obtaining the "remake" rights :)
 

Chuck Pennington

Screenwriter
Joined
May 11, 2001
Messages
1,012
This is a tough one. The 2023 Kino is definitely sharper, the sound is quite a bit crisper in tone, and it is free of the blue splotches that mar many scenes compared to the 2022 Imprint Blu-ray. But as far as eye-popping color goes, well… It would seem that perhaps a few more adjustments could’ve been made for the new 4K-sourced master. It’s possible some scenes should appear rather dark and bluish in keeping with the nighttime setting of some scenes, but I do wonder if perhaps a few adjustments should’ve been made throughout this new master so that the color had some of the richness (but not the oversaturation) of the prior release.

The colored halos and fringing are definitely gone. I only noticed the very different color scheme in some scenes when making this A/B comparison video, which includes a few shots at twice the size to show up the sharpness difference.



E9AC16DD-D0CC-4363-86BF-A574AB3813C3.png

F79AF642-21E9-4924-B1C6-02FA3731F90D.png

4053BEB9-39A0-4CEE-B688-69800665526C.png

1FEB1EAE-1900-406C-B6A3-CDC2DCCE4DCB.png
 

Flashgear

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
2,625
Location
Alberta Canada
Real Name
Randall
This is a tough one. The 2023 Kino is definitely sharper, the sound is quite a bit crisper in tone, and it is free of the blue splotches that mar many scenes compared to the 2022 Imprint Blu-ray. But as far as eye-popping color goes, well… It would seem that perhaps a few more adjustments could’ve been made for the new 4K-sourced master.
Thank you Chuck for all the hard work of preparing these comparative video clips and screen caps! Very much appreciated! Like yourself, now having both Blus, it's relatively easy to see the virtues in both of them. You do wish (and should expect) that an increase in definition shouldn't come at the expense of vibrant colors. A little maddening.
 

Chuck Pennington

Screenwriter
Joined
May 11, 2001
Messages
1,012
With a bit of additional enhancement (contrast and color-wise), the Kino release is quite marvelous. It’s a shame that Yma Sumac’s performances weren’t sonically upgraded as they have always been of rather low fidelity in the final film soundtrack compared to the album from which they were sourced.

Here is my enhanced version of these scenes using the remastered album master:

 

Wayne Klein

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Messages
231
With a bit of additional enhancement (contrast and color-wise), the Kino release is quite marvelous. It’s a shame that Yma Sumac’s performances weren’t sonically upgraded as they have always been of rather low fidelity in the final film soundtrack compared to the album from which they were sourced.

Here is my enhanced version of these scenes using the remastered album master:


Perhaps rights issues For the soundtrack?
 

Kent K H

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
517
With a bit of additional enhancement (contrast and color-wise), the Kino release is quite marvelous. It’s a shame that Yma Sumac’s performances weren’t sonically upgraded as they have always been of rather low fidelity in the final film soundtrack compared to the album from which they were sourced.

Here is my enhanced version of these scenes using the remastered album master:


You mean I have to listen to my record? Rip-off! ;)
 

Wayne Klein

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Messages
231
No. Just no effort expended. They already had the rights because the recordings were used in the film, albeit lower quality dubs.
I was referring more to who owns the master tapes that (if they exist) would be used. May be different rights issues, etc. I have no idea if they even investigated doing that or not or who currently owns the rights. Hard to say it would have been nice to upgrade it though.
 

Chuck Pennington

Screenwriter
Joined
May 11, 2001
Messages
1,012
I was referring more to who owns the master tapes that (if they exist) would be used. May be different rights issues, etc. I have no idea if they even investigated doing that or not or who currently owns the rights. Hard to say it would have been nice to upgrade it though.
Paramount owns the film, Capitol Records owns the Yma recordings. They receive credit in the film. With how awful those scenes sound in the film (they stick out like a sore thumb fidelity-wise), it’s unfortunate they weren’t upgraded. If I was able to do it, well…
 

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
63,505
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
Paramount owns the film, Capitol Records owns the Yma recordings. They receive credit in the film. With how awful those scenes sound in the film (they stick out like a sore thumb fidelity-wise), it’s unfortunate they weren’t upgraded. If I was able to do it, well…
I'm sure the profit margin for this minor Blu-ray release isn't much so I'm guessing that cost was the prohibitive factor here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
354,232
Messages
5,043,125
Members
143,647
Latest member
kinhnghiemonlin
Recent bookmarks
0
Top