- Joined
- Feb 8, 1999
- Messages
- 18,422
- Real Name
- Robert Harris
It’s almost there. Did you have a print back in the day?But, but, I want the Technicolor pop. I need it.
It’s almost there. Did you have a print back in the day?But, but, I want the Technicolor pop. I need it.
That's an interesting site, but not the same one. The post I found was written in narrative form and focused more on the liability of both sets of parents. Apparently they (parents) were fully onboard and gave consent for Olivia and Leonard to do whatever was asked of them. It also explained that Paramount, being an American company, was subject to California age of consent laws.Like I said the image on the poster in 1968 should have been the time to sue not 50 years later
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates...bout-nudity-in-zeffirellis-1968-romeo--juliet Is this the one? Will be interesting to see if Criterion sells more than they would have!
That's an interesting site, but not the same one. The post I found was written in narrative form and focused more on the liability of both sets of parents. Apparently they (parents) were fully onboard and gave consent for Olivia and Leonard to do whatever was asked of them.
Exhibit A: Terri Shields.In the prior Romeo and Juliet thread, I said the following, which I think is still relevant:
I have no insight into what happened on this production, except to say that having a parent on set would not necessarily guarantee that nothing inappropriate occurred. A parent who is not part of the movie industry can feel a lot of pressure to go along with whatever the director wants, if assured that, "No no, this is fine. It's not a big deal at all for your underage daughter to take her clothes off. Just look at all these people standing around. We're all professionals here. What could happen?"
The interesting thing is that Franco had an assistant called Dyson Lovell who was predatory. A lot of nasty stories flew around about him at the time, and later when making the film about Francis of Asissi.The legal maneuverings are theoretically about the trauma that may have been inflicted on the then-underaged actors by an allegedly abusive director: nothing to do with audience prudery.
A parent who is not part of the movie industry can feel a lot of pressure to go along with whatever the director wants, if assured that, "No no, this is fine. It's not a big deal at all for your underage daughter to take her clothes off. Just look at all these people standing around. We're all professionals here. What could happen?"
Brooke Shields also had some unpleasant experiences with Zeffirelli on the set of Endless Love.it all sounded unpleasant to put it mildly.
Her mom she should have been arrested - Pretty Baby and Blue Lagoon YIKES - - wonder when it goes to court ----- soon - thankfully the film was released by Criterion today!Brooke Shields also had some unpleasant experiences with Zeffirelli on the set of Endless Love.
If Franco was involved we may never know, but it all sounded unpleasant to put it mildly.
Brooke Shields also had some unpleasant experiences with Zeffirelli on the set of Endless Love.
I thought the nudity as well as the "conspicuous" flies in the boy's costumes in R&J appropriately suggested the heat in the adolescent sexuality that was absent in previous versions of the story.
How would this Technicolor pop manifest itself? More saturation to the colors? A shift in their hues?But, but, I want the Technicolor pop. I need it.
Ignorance (innocence) is bliss. One can never go back.How would this Technicolor pop manifest itself? More saturation to the colors? A shift in their hues?
I guess ignorance is truly bliss, because in not knowing what I'm missing, I can simply enjoy what IS there.
And from the various screencaps I've seen of this, it sure looks like the wonderful upgrade of the old RB Bd I've been craving for years now.
Ignorance can be remedied; innocence, once lost, can never be regained.Ignorance (innocence) is bliss. One can never go back.