sbjork
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2020
- Messages
- 972
- Real Name
- Stephen
I'm quite aware of that most of them weren't mistakes per se. I was talking about alterations in general at that point, not just Panic Room in particular. But if most of these particular alterations aren't even noticeable in the first place unless they're pointed out to people, then yes, obsessing over them is just doing a reverse David Fincher. And I can't stress enough that I'm as obsessive about many details as they come. I'm the one that held up a review of the Deaf Crocodile The Cathedral of New Emotions for over a week because I couldn't find any concrete information on how it was produced, and vaguebooking it just wasn't good enough for me. I finally had Dennis Bartok pass along my questions to Helmut Herbst's family and friends, and pieced together what I could from the contradictory replies that they gave me. And I wrote a whole paragraph to sum up all of that as best as I could, despite the fact that no one who reads it will ever give a rat's patoot. It was attention to detail that would only satisfy me.The things Fincher is changing aren't even mistakes. They're just details that, 23 years later, Fincher feels like changing purely for the sake of changing something.
Tl;dr: as someone who does obsess over details, I'm telling you that the only thing stopping you from letting most of these changes go is you. And, for the record, you be you, and I'm not trying to get you to change. I'm just saying that if someone like me can overlook them, then the average viewer really isn't going to give a rat's patoot.
(Also for the record, there are two specific changes that do stand out to me, with one of them really bothering me, but I'm not going to describe it here because I don't want to ruin it for anyone who doesn't catch what's wrong about it. I want people to enjoy movies, not have them spoiled.)