What's new

A Few Words About A few words about...™ Flashdance - in Blu-ray (1 Viewer)

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
15,660
Real Name
Robert Harris
Adrian Lyne's Flashdance opened on April 15, 1983, to generally disastrous reviews. It was based upon'
the life of Maureen Marder, construction worker / stripper.

Fortunately, for me, I'd not read them. Saw it in a theater, and loved it.

A 20 year-old young woman, stuck in a decaying Pittsburgh (Wayne, Scott and Dietrich had left town long before),
wanting nothing but to dance, and get out of the mills.

And everything goes wrong for her.

Jennifer Beals, in her first starring role is terrific, and remains so to this day, as the film stands the test of time beautifully.
I noted that the date of birth for her character, Alex Owens, as seen on her application form, is her own December 19, 1963.

Music composed by Giorgio Moroder, who had previously scored a silent film;

Beautifully cut;

Great cinematography.

Just a terrific piece of entertainment.

How does it look and sound on Paramount's new Blu-ray?

Very nice. No dirt. No registration or fade issues. Nice black levels, and shadow detail. It all works beautifully.

When I put together these offerings, I occasionally check certain actors, to see where they've gone in the
intervening years, and was troubled to find that Sunny Johnson, who played Jeanie Szabo in the film (the ice
skating friend), passed away just eight weeks after the film opened.

This is spine number 4 in Paramount's new super-duper series, was released on Blu-ray, with more extras than are
on this new one. Only one new short featurette, with director Lyne. I had expected more for a super-duper release,
possibly a piece with Ms Beals, but the image quality is lovely. I presume it's a new transfer, but can't comment,
as I no longer have the previous versions, which as I recall, was also a very nice image harvest.

All that matters is that it's fine.

Nominated for four Academy Awards (Editing, Music/Original Score, Cinematography, and Original Song (What a Feeling) - which it won.

If you don't have Flashdance in your library, this one will do very nicely.

Image - 5

Audio - 5

Pass / Fail - Pass

Upgrade from previous Blu-ray - No

Recommended

RAH

 
Last edited by a moderator:

octobercountry

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
133
Real Name
Fred
Argh, why are new editions released with fewer special features than the old ones! Very frustrating. The previous disc had a five-part behind-the-scenes documentary running nearly 50 minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

PMF

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
5,531
Real Name
Philip
Okay, then, a 5/5 for “Flashdance” it is. I’ll go the way of RAH and purchase down the road; but for this first batch of “Paramount Presents” BDs, its “Fatal Attraction” that’s on my front burner...that is, if you know what I mean. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Christian D66

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
103
Real Name
Christian
I was a teenager when this came out and thought it was the first music video film. But empMTV. Beals is charming but the plot loses grit with the ridiculous welders dance club and...oh what a feeling!
 

Garysb

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
4,777
So far it appears this new Paramount label has been a way for them to charge more for less. Hopefully most people interested in these films got them when they were first on blu ray.
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
23,510
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Argh, why are new editions released with fewer special features than the old ones! Very frustrating. The previous disc had a five-part behind-the-scenes documentary running nearly 50 minutes.

The unsexy answer is usually licensing/residual payment costs. Studios did major market research on bonus features around 2005 or so and discovered that in the overwhelming majority of cases, bonus features didn’t drive sales. Flash forward to present day where physical media sales are in decline across the board, especially for catalog titles, and the result is that the profit margins are tighter than they’ve ever been. It’s often a simple case that excluding older bonus features won’t affect sales figures in any significant way, while adding them would cost the studio more without measurably increasing how many copies are sold.

...which is undeniably a bummer for the shrinking number of enthusiasts like us who do enjoy that material.
 

dpippel

Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2000
Messages
10,855
Location
Sonora Norte
Real Name
Doug
Enthusiasts want special features, and these releases are being targeted at enthusiasts. Yet once again, if sales don't live up to expectations it won't be because it's a (presumably) repackaged existing transfer of a catalog title with FEWER extras than the current release, and that this gets widely reported online among enthusiasts. It'll be because "no one wants to buy physical media any more."

IMO, if Paramount REALLY wants this Paramount Presents line to be successful, they need look no further than The Criterion Collection as a role model. If they want enthusiasts to gobble these releases up then they need to bring something of value to the table. Basing 2020 business decisions on 15 year old market analysis data is idiotic.
 
Last edited:

Dave H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2000
Messages
5,957
I never saw the movie, but enjoy a lot of 80s stuff.

Okay for a blind buy?
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
Argh, why are new editions released with fewer special features than the old ones! Very frustrating. The previous disc had a five-part behind-the-scenes documentary running nearly 50 minutes.

At least they don't cut stuff out of the actual movie like a certain rodent-based studio, the one the then-head of Paramount left for a year later.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
I'm more familiar with the soundtrack than the movie as it was all the rage when I was born. "What a Feeling" won the Best Song Oscar while the top prizes of 1983 went to another Paramount movie: Terms of Endearment.

They also made Trading Places that same year, and before the virus Disney and Paramount traded places in terms of how they were doing financially then.
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
11,700
I'm more familiar with the soundtrack than the movie as it was all the rage when I was born. "What a Feeling" won the Best Song Oscar while the top prizes of 1983 went to another Paramount movie: Terms of Endearment.

I remembered "Flashdance" as a hit soundtrack 1st, a "fashion statement" 2nd and a movie 3rd.

I knew it did well, but I thought its success as a movie was well below its status in those other areas.

I was wrong! "Flashdance" was the 3rd highest-grossing movie of 1983 in the US! :oops:

It's definitely aged the worst of those 3. "Jedi" remains fun, and while I've not seen it in years, I suspect "Terms of Endearment" probably holds up fairly well.

Like I said earlier, "Flashdance" is total time capsule stuff. It couldn't be more dated if it tried! :D
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
11,700
Ok Mr. Smarty Pants! :) You may have heard that, but in reading through the review and other comments, I don’t see it mentioned at all.

I mentioned it in my review:

"It doesn’t help that the movie uses a hilariously obvious “dance double” for Alex’s climactic audition. Not for one second do we believe Beals does her own performance there, and the disconnect makes this “big moment” laughable. "
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
351,404
Messages
4,952,424
Members
143,048
Latest member
Savageatyme83
Recent bookmarks
0
Top