What's new

Gerani53

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 26, 2020
Messages
340
Real Name
Gary Gerani
...and there have been some pretty amazing restorations this past year, from vintage '30s classics like DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE to Cinerama epics like THE WONDERFUL WORLD OF THE BROTHERS GRIMM. It really is a golden era for movie collectors.
 

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
62,820
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
IMG_1907.jpeg

Just finished watching my copy. Also had the chance to watch the 1941 remake which is pretty much a mirror of the original.

Both films are equally as good. I suppose I was more taken aback by Spencer Tracy's performance only due to the fact I had never seen him play an evil character like that before and it was wholly against the persona I had known him to be. That being said, Frederic March did an amazing job -- especially with his agility in portraying Mr. Hyde.

Kind of odd that in the original, Dr. Jekyll is pronounced as "Jeekle." Not sure if it was pronounced the same in the remake.

Saw a flub in the final scene where Mr. Hyde is corned in the lab. As he climbs the bookcases you can see the hanging boom mike.

Finally, been reading all the prior comments about how everyone loves the fact that this is a "pre-code" film. Perhaps all the fuss concerns the woman who gets hurt, is brought to her bed by Dr. Jekyll, and then undresses in front of him. There's bare leg and a glimpse of a blanket-covered chest, but nothing that I thought was overly provocative. Didn't see anything here that I thought was too risque, but perhaps I am comparing it to today's standards.
 

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
62,051
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
eek… you just gave ammunition to the earlier argument that WAC was wrong to present this in Movietone aspect ratio. :D
As I'm watching my share of classic horror movies this month, I noticed a couple of mistakes regarding boom mics being in certain scenes.
 

Mark B

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
1,048
Location
Saranac Lake, NY
Real Name
Mark
A beautiful restoration. Such obvious care was taken by the film makers with every set-up, resulting in brilliant compositions with innovations that belie the year of its production. I found the use of diagonal slow-wipe split screens especially effective. Vignetting the point-of-view shots would be compromised had the image been cropped, and after viewing the entire disc I agree fully with the choice to use 1.19:1 for the image ratio.

The cheated mirror shot early on had me fooled for a second. Clever! By the time the third act was in full swing I was completely sucked in to the story and on the edge of my seat, despite having seen the film before. It is always such a treat when a transfer to home media is so well done that one forgets about the technical aspects of viewing the film and gets lost in the on screen action.

As a lover of carefully lit black and white imagery I could not be more impressed. Black levels are solid, grayscale impeccable, whites never bloom, detail intact, focus pulls evident. Just right.
 

ahollis

Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
8,613
Location
New Orleans
Real Name
Allen
I watched my copy tonight and I was so wrapped up into the movie I completely didn’t see the boom. I had to play that scene again and there it was, just a small half round black thing for 3 seconds. On my first pass it looked as if it belonged with all the chains and other items you usually see hanging from from the ceiling in a turn of the century laboratory. Other than that ‘mistake’ the aspect of the film looked fine and composed right, to my uneducated eyes.
 

RICK BOND

Screenwriter
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
1,513
Location
New Jersey
Real Name
RICK
What a Beautiful Restoration ! :D Last year I bought the 1931 & 1941 Digital versions. Because I Love both of them. The 1941 MGM Bluray was released 5 months ago and looked Excellent. :biggrin: This 1931 New Bluray has all the spots, dirt, and lines all removed. So clean and sharp. :thumbsup: Amazing for a 91 year old classic movie. Hats off to WBArchive and George F. for another Gorgeous Bluray release. ;) Can't wait to see what we get in 2023 ! :banana:
 

timk1041

Screenwriter
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
1,421
Real Name
Timothy
Received my copy yesterday. I noticed on the back of the case the running time says 96 minutes. I thought the original full-length time was 98 minutes, and the cut version was as little as 82 minutes. Can anyone substantiate that? It also on the back of the case says 17 minutes was restored. I haven't watched the blu yet, so I am wondering if more is on here compared to the DVD.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
353,167
Messages
5,009,895
Members
143,410
Latest member
yeseniadfolsen
Recent bookmarks
0
Top