What's new

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,457
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
I want to be extremely clear that my negative comments on a couple of shots should not take center stage over an otherwise beautiful 4k release.
Absolutely and your point is clearly taken, even in the review. I'd encourage everyone to support releases like this.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,892
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
I want to be extremely clear that my negative comments on a couple of shots should not take center stage over an otherwise beautiful 4k release.
I was thinking of this thread when I saw the hue and cry over Kino's 4K The Great Escape not getting the HDR treatment.

Is it fair to say that there's not 4K of information on the surviving elements of Kane?
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,397
Real Name
Robert Harris
I was thinking of this thread when I saw the hue and cry over Kino's 4K The Great Escape not getting the HDR treatment.

Is it fair to say that there's not 4K of information on the surviving elements of Kane?
I doubt that there's 2k, which is not to say that Criterion should not honor it with a full-out 4k release, regardless.
 

JediFonger

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
4,241
Real Name
YiFeng You
i know it’s apples&oranges but yet here we are citizen kane with dolby vision hdr. i still dont understand or comprehend if analog film has more or less colors than what hdr brings to the table… or is hdr simply a digital only feature but that certain stocks analog film can “record” more colors or certain ones “maxes out” at rec709 vs 2020
 

rdimucci

Second Unit
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
267
Real Name
Robert DiMucci
I doubt that there's 2k [for Citizen Kane], which is not to say that Criterion should not honor it with a full-out 4k release, regardless.
So I assume then that the primary differences between the 4K disc and the previous Warner Blu-ray will come from the new image harvest rather than the 4K resolution possibilities on the new disc.
 

ghostwind

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Messages
195
Real Name
bogdan
I'm no fan of HDR or DV, as I've stated in the past, but I do believe that 4K on resolution alone would not have sold if it didn't come packaged with either of them.
 

sbjork

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 1, 2020
Messages
732
Real Name
Stephen
Well, I just preordered this 4K release at 50% off during Barnes & Noble's current Criterion sale. I ordered a couple of more Criterion 4K titles too.
Ach, sunavagun. I had missed the Criterion Flash Sale and actually wasn't too worried about that since I have such an insane backlog of discs to get through right now, but I hadn't noticed B&N's sale was going on as well, so I guess that opportunity knocked twice. It was nice that they let you get the discount on preorders, which Criterion doesn't always do, but it wouldn't give me the price for the UHD of A Hard Day's Night. At least I got orders in for Citizen Kane and Mulholland Drive.
 

Blu_rayfan66

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
212
Location
Spain
Real Name
Hugh S.
Ach, sunavagun. I had missed the Criterion Flash Sale and actually wasn't too worried about that since I have such an insane backlog of discs to get through right now, but I hadn't noticed B&N's sale was going on as well, so I guess that opportunity knocked twice. It was nice that they let you get the discount on preorders, which Criterion doesn't always do, but it wouldn't give me the price for the UHD of A Hard Day's Night. At least I got orders in for Citizen Kane and Mulholland Drive.
Rumor is Fidelity In Motion are handling the encoding of the UK 'Mulholland Drive' StudioCanal 4K so may end up having a better transfer vs. the Criterion
 
Last edited:

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
67,804
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
Ach, sunavagun. I had missed the Criterion Flash Sale and actually wasn't too worried about that since I have such an insane backlog of discs to get through right now, but I hadn't noticed B&N's sale was going on as well, so I guess that opportunity knocked twice. It was nice that they let you get the discount on preorders, which Criterion doesn't always do, but it wouldn't give me the price for the UHD of A Hard Day's Night. At least I got orders in for Citizen Kane and Mulholland Drive.
Titles have to be released or are scheduled for released during the B&N sale for the sale discount to be applied.
 

sbjork

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 1, 2020
Messages
732
Real Name
Stephen
Rumor is Fidelity In Motion are handling the encoding of the UK 'Mulholland Drive' StudioCanal 4K so may end up having a better transfer vs. the Criterion
StudioCanal is all over the map with their encodes. If that's the case, they may well indeed be better. If not, well. . .

I'm going to give Criterion a chance on this one. Fingers crossed, I would hope since they've dragged their feet so long on UHD, they won't take chances with their first few releases.
 

david hare

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
683
Real Name
david hare
StudioCanal is all over the map with their encodes. If that's the case, they may well indeed be better. If not, well. . .

I'm going to give Criterion a chance on this one. Fingers crossed, I would hope since they've dragged their feet so long on UHD, they won't take chances with their first few releases.
All of Canal’s FIM encodes are flawless. I have absolutely no doubt that the FIM/Dave Mackenzie 4K encode for Canal will be perfect and trouble free. Given past history of the earlier 4K used by Criterion for their previous Blu Ray that 4K master was also done by Mackenzie and FIM for the rights holder Canal. So I am hoping the forthcoming Criterion 4K and the Canal 4K will be the same encode. It seems improbably to imagine Criterion and Lee Kline would just do another totally different encode.Or is it?
 

david hare

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
683
Real Name
david hare
Also a postscript on Kane and the two shots Mr Harris references in his review. Now the happy owner of a new projector I’ve been trailing back over recent Blus of stuff that’s shortly due in UHD. When I played back the Warner Annversary BD of Kane I scoped right into the two sequences Mr Harris cites. Guess what, in both cases the shots are exactly the same visual issues as Mr Harris describes in the UHD. Cotton’s face is clearly if dimly recognizable in not the first but the second short wide shot of the group in the screening room, and the camera gives it a few seconds for his face to sink in. Diito the library AB shot, in which just as Mr Harris describes, the first shot closing into the page is fully flared out in white, with the B shot showing the text. It looks like these two shots‘ lighting values are either intentional or simply baked in, at least from the point of time when Warner did this earlier 4K restoration.
 
Last edited:

sbjork

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 1, 2020
Messages
732
Real Name
Stephen
Also a postscript on Kane and the two shots Mr Harris references in his review. Now the happy owner of a new projector I’ve been trailing back over recent Blus of stuff that’s shortly due in Blu. When I played back the Warner Annversary BD of Kane I scoped right into the two sequences Mr Harris cites. Guess what, in both cases the shots are exactly the same visual issues as Mr Harris describes in the UHD. Cotton’s face is clearly if dimly recognizable in not the first but the second short wide shot of the group in the screening room, and the camera gives it a few seconds for his face to sink in. Diito the library AB shot, in which just as Mr Harris describes, the first shot closing into the page is fully flared out in white, with the B shot showing the text. It looks like these two shots‘ lighting values are either intentional or simply baked in, at least from the point of time when Warner did this earlier 4K restoration.
Can't even remember from the last time I watched it, but now I'll make a point of putting my WB disc in tonight to check it out. It will be especially interesting to compare to the UHD, whenever that ships for me.
 

sbjork

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 1, 2020
Messages
732
Real Name
Stephen
All of Canal’s FIM encodes are flawless. I have absolutely no doubt that the FIM/Dave Mackenzie 4K encode for Canal will be perfect and trouble free. Given past history of the earlier 4K used by Criterion for their previous Blu Ray that 4K master was also done by Mackenzie and FIM for the rights holder Canal. So I am hoping the forthcoming Criterion 4K and the Canal 4K will be the same encode. It seems improbably to imagine Criterion and Lee Kline would just do another totally different encode.Or is it?
I agree about the FIM being flawless; I was just responding to the "rumor is" comment that the other poster made. If it's more than a rumor, and FIM is definitely handling it, then yes, it will be as perfect as possible. It's just that StudioCanal doesn't always use them, and when they don't, the results have been more problematic.

But yes, I can't imagine different encodes in this case, so either way, I'm banking on the Criterion being just fine.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,397
Real Name
Robert Harris
Also a postscript on Kane and the two shots Mr Harris references in his review. Now the happy owner of a new projector I’ve been trailing back over recent Blus of stuff that’s shortly due in UHD. When I played back the Warner Annversary BD of Kane I scoped right into the two sequences Mr Harris cites. Guess what, in both cases the shots are exactly the same visual issues as Mr Harris describes in the UHD. Cotton’s face is clearly if dimly recognizable in not the first but the second short wide shot of the group in the screening room, and the camera gives it a few seconds for his face to sink in. Diito the library AB shot, in which just as Mr Harris describes, the first shot closing into the page is fully flared out in white, with the B shot showing the text. It looks like these two shots‘ lighting values are either intentional or simply baked in, at least from the point of time when Warner did this earlier 4K restoration.
I’m seeing writing on the manuscript page in the WB release. In distinct, but absolutely there. It’s blown out on the 4k. Both have the screening room shots timed too bright.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,016
Messages
5,128,489
Members
144,241
Latest member
acinstallation449
Recent bookmarks
0
Top