I'm curious. Did PJ do this recreation of the spider pit on his own nickel because he is such a KK fan? This had to cost more than a few bucks and seems far beyond what any studio would be willing to do for a reissue of an old movie.
Which also brings to mind that it seems to me I read somehwere they couldn't get any footage of the original to use in the extras for PJ's DVD of his movie. I remember seeing in the extra about Skull Island on PJ's KK, the comment that original footage of the island had been lost and the footage used was a recreation.
That "Natural History of Skull Island" would have been a great spot for a few feet of film from the original. If PJ went to such lenghts to contribute to the DVD of the original, you'd think they could have cut him some slack for his DVD.
Well, if PJ did the spider pit recreation out of his own pocket and enthusiasm, and in an effort to build up good will with him (never know when that might come in handy), you would think they would.
However, I'm still wondering how the recreation was funded.
Originally posted by Tino: Just a suggestion, but perhaps adding "from King Kong" to the thread title may steer more people to this thread as some may think you're talking about a film called "The Spider Pit".
As well as a mention of whether we're talking about bonus features found on the 1930s original or the 2005 remake; I know which one, but the numerous mentions of Peter Jackson may confuse the uninitiated and lead to faulty purchases.
What are you talking about? They make deals with each other all the time. They accomodate each other all the time. It's in their best interests to be competitive, but not compete too hard -- if you know what I mean.