What's new

A Few Words About A few words about...™ West Side Story -- in Blu-ray (2 Viewers)

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,274
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Maybe I misread, but I thought I saw that one of the reasons for Barber's firing was that he wanted to sell the company, while the board did not. So if thats the case, I can't imagine they'd look to sell after firing the guy who wanted to do exactly that.
 

PMF

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
6,003
Real Name
Philip
Still, one less Barber is "a very good start"; which is sort of like that punch line from the joke that asks, "What do you call a 100 lawyers at the bottom of the sea"?
 
Last edited:

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,311
Real Name
Robert Harris
At the absolute least, Sony would do well to buy the distribution rights to MGM's titles, else they be allowed to decay to dust in a forgotten archive like a nightmare version of the ending of Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Why would any entity attempt to acquire distribution rights, without quality elements, ready to distribute?

My guesstimate to bring the MGM library into proper preserved shape, as assets, could be half a billion dollars.

Any move forward, would, of necessity, need to begin with an inventory. That alone, is an immense undertaking.

Copyrights and titles on a page are irrelevant to the reality of the situation.
 

PMF

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
6,003
Real Name
Philip
$$$ for restorations are always a:welcome:
May all forms of fund-raising begin.:cool:
 
Last edited:

Allansfirebird

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
613
Real Name
Sean
Why would any entity attempt to acquire distribution rights, without quality elements, ready to distribute?

My guesstimate to bring the MGM library into proper preserved shape, as assets, could be half a billion dollars.

Any move forward, would, of necessity, need to begin with an inventory. That alone, is an immense undertaking.

Copyrights and titles on a page are irrelevant to the reality of the situation.
The point I was trying to make was that, if Sony at least got access to the elements themselves, they could get the efforts moving towards preservation, something it seems MGM hasn't been all that interested in of late. Perhaps referring to the distribution rights wasn't the correct wording on my part.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,311
Real Name
Robert Harris
The point I was trying to make was that, if Sony at least got access to the elements themselves, they could get the efforts moving towards preservation, something it seems MGM hasn't been all that interested in of late. Perhaps referring to the distribution rights wasn't the correct wording on my part.

Sorry.

Confused.

Are you suggesting that SONY get access to the elements, or purchase the library?
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,230
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
The only reason anyone might be interested in buying MGM would be to gain a 50% stake in the Bond series - possibly 100% if rumours about the Broccolis looking to exit the Bond business turn out to be true.
 

Questjonmark

Auditioning
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Messages
8
Real Name
Jonathan McMillan
Update: Feb 15

A replacement disc has finally been viewed.

And I've not come away smiling.

What could possibly be more simple than encoding a dissolve, in which one piece of film fades out, while the other fades in.

This is not what is occurring, and is not what the film was designed to be.

Once again (I didn't expect a change), the opening whistles are in the wrong place, fully at front proscenium, as opposed to the rear.

I've not bothered to check dupes, as I've given up on this release.

While it would be nice if MGM once again, offered a return for a proper disc, I'm wondering if as a corporate entity, they have the ability to get this right.

MGM owns many great films, but they are not represented properly.

It pains me to say that this Blu-ray is still...

Not Recommended.

And the pity is that generally, this is a beautiful release.

A recall is in order.

RAH



With discussions on line regarding West Side Story, I was able to get a UK copy, and will comment on that until my domestic arrives. Hopefully, there will be differences, but somehow I have a feeling it is what it is.

West Side Story has not be a lucky film on home video in the past few years. The last major DVD release was unviewable as a duet was so far out of sync, it seemed as if Maria was singing Tony's lines.

Now we have the Blu-ray, supposedly with 300 hours of restoration, whatever that means.

First the bad...

Huge problems from the beginning, as has been noted on the web.

The final dissolve from Mr. Bass' brilliant linear skyline pattern to the Main Title has somehow been turned into a fade out / fade in.

I'm not at all sure how this can occur, as any serious release should be prepped with both a continuity as well as reference. Apparently, neither were necessary for West Side Story.

From a purely technical standpoint, this is an easy error to make, as the original negative would have the dissolve as a printer function, as marked on the edges of the film. These errors have occurred in the past when older negatives are handled by some entity other than the original laboratory, which in this case was Technicolor. But with original reference prints that would clearly show this as a dissolve...

This is inexcusable.

Once we get past the Main Title, we hit helicopter shots of Manhattan, which now have a slight jitter to them that I don't recall in the past. This may be my memory playing tricks, but regardless, it's something one can live with.

The first sound heard in the film are whistles, which should come from the side rears, a mix of channels 1 & 6, and 5 & 6, bringing the sound just forward of rear. This doesn't seem to be occurring, as they seem a bit forward. Not a big deal. I can also live with this.

But far worse, we have faded opticals, which for whatever reason (cost?) no one felt should be fixed. Flesh tones are nonexistent, contrast blooms, sharpness in non-existent. Just bad, especially when one compares it to the good.

And good there is:

With the exception of the points noted above, the scan (which I've heard was performed by HTV, the company behind the "restoration" of Patton) seems very nice. There's stability to the image, reasonable grain and good color. Overall a good scan. I have no complaints.

Color also is nicely handled, with the exception of the dupes, which once transparent to the original, are now abominable.

While I don't understand why there was no return to the original (recently preserved) 6-track 70mm mix, the audio is superb. I had occasional problems, but nothing that would be disturbing to the casual viewer.

Once there is a recall -- and a recall is an absolute necessity, as this is no longer the Best Picture of 1961, but rather, some oddly adapted version -- and the dupe problems are dealt with, I'll be pleased to give this a very high rating.

My advice would be to pull the Blu-ray from distribution before it ships to consumers domestically, go back in and do the various necessary fixes, and then come back out -- in a few months -- with a viable product. If there is a re-issued version, there should be differentiation in the packaging.

As it is...

What we have is basically, garbage in, garbage out.

At this point in time, Not Recommended.

RAH
None of your observations can discourage this "casual viewer" with 58 year-old, slowly degenerating glazzies from spending $14.99 for this considerable package.
 
Last edited:

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,274
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
I did catch a 70mm print of West Side Story last month (the print was from 2011) and it was a delight to watch - particularly because the opening transition was correct.
 

PMF

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
6,003
Real Name
Philip
Hopefully we'll finally get a proper release of this around the time the new version hits theaters.
If Steven Spielberg's version of West Side Story does well, then one has to wonder if a re-make of yet another Robert Wise musical would soon be at hand. I can see it now, Francis Ford Coppola presents "A Postulant Now". Sorry, I couldn't resist.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

B-ROLL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
4,976
Real Name
Bryan
If Steven Spielberg's version of West Side Story does well, then one has to wonder if a re-make of yet another Robert Wise musical would soon be at hand. I can see it now, Francis Ford Coppola presents "A Postulant Now". Sorry, I couldn't resist.:rolleyes:
Finian's Rainbow wasn't enough ... ;)?
51RQDDQFQ9L.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,814
Messages
5,123,736
Members
144,184
Latest member
H-508
Recent bookmarks
0
Top