What's new

A Few Words About A few words about...™ The Color of Money -- in Blu-ray (1 Viewer)

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,397
Real Name
Robert Harris
Originally Posted by TravisR /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray#post_3936797
Given the very negative reactions that this disc is getting, it sounds like it's pretty lousy on any larger screen. This doesn't seem like other times when RAH has said that a disc could be better and other people over react and want to storm Castle Universal with pitchforks and torches. And he can chime in but when he says "smaller screens", I take that to mean monitors much smaller than 55 inches.
Correct.

Almost everything will look good at 30".
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,397
Real Name
Robert Harris
Originally Posted by FanboyZ /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray#post_3936878
How is it that these types of disasters get out?

Apparently to the studios, they're not "disasters." They are happy to have the work of artists represented in such a negative way.

I can imagine someone looking at number, and saying something like:

"Scorsese?

What's he done lately?

Anything for us?

I liked Carrie, but beyond that..."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PMF

FoxyMulder

映画ファン
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
5,385
Location
Scotland
Real Name
Malcolm
Originally Posted by FanboyZ /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray#post_3936878
How is it that these types of disasters get out?

The quality control staff view them on their IPhones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Felix Martinez

Screenwriter
Joined
Aug 27, 2001
Messages
1,504
Location
South Florida
Real Name
Felix E. Martinez
I think the masters are being optimized for streaming delivery. Why in the world would you want multiple masters, especially one with lotsa pesky grain that would require a high bitrate to reproduce correctly and a certain physical medium (ahem) to deliver it?
 

Felix Martinez

Screenwriter
Joined
Aug 27, 2001
Messages
1,504
Location
South Florida
Real Name
Felix E. Martinez
Robert Harris said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanboyZ /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray#post_3936878
How is it that these types of disasters get out?

Apparently to the studios, they're not "disasters." They are happy to have the work of artists represented in such a negative way.

I can imagine someone looking at number, and saying something like:

"Scorsese?

What's he done lately?

Anything for us?

I liked Carrie, but beyond that..."
Are you still optimistic about Jaws...?
EDIT: whoops, wrong thread, sorry. These probs are crossing over too frequently lately...
 

rsmithjr

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Messages
1,228
Location
Palo Alto, CA
Real Name
Robert Smith
Waited a long time to replace by LD with a Blu-ray of this title.
Now it looks like I will be sticking with the LD. Just like Spartacus.
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
Originally Posted by FoxyMulder /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray#post_3936816

So Bluray.com called it right and DVDBeaver called it wrong...
DVDBeaver hasn't been worth taking seriously since they declaired the SD of There Will Be Blood as "flawless" (it was a noisy edge-enhanced mess).
 

Joseph Bolus

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 4, 1999
Messages
2,780
rsmithjr said:
Waited a long time to replace by LD with a Blu-ray of this title.
Now it looks like I will be sticking with the LD. Just like Spartacus.
Curiously, "Blu-ray.com" actually compares this BD transfer to LD in their review!!
Here's an excerpt:
" ... the frame crackles and vibrates to an extent I have rarely seen since the days of laserdisc. Depending on screen size and individual disposition, the noise may or may not be tolerable, but either way it obscures picture detail. Grain this ain't."
Still --- they gave the video transfer a 1 out of 5. So, there's your review on a more conventional monitor as opposed to projection!!
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,397
Real Name
Robert Harris
Originally Posted by Joseph Bolus /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray#post_3937111
Curiously, "Blu-ray.com" actually compares this BD transfer to LD in their review!!
Here's an excerpt:
" ... the frame crackles and vibrates to an extent I have rarely seen since the days of laserdisc. Depending on screen size and individual disposition, the noise may or may not be tolerable, but either way it obscures picture detail. Grain this ain't."
Still --- they gave the video transfer a 1 out of 5. So, there's your review on a more conventional monitor as opposed to projection!!

I actually considered giving CoM a 1 rating, but then dropped it a full point based upon pure level of realizing what it could, and should have been. The Color of Money is an easy film to bring to Blu-ray. Everything is in place.

RAH
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Scott Calvert

Supporting Actor
Joined
Nov 2, 1998
Messages
885
David Weicker said:
If this is the new criteria, it makes these 'reviews' utterly worthless for those of us who don't project. As someone who watches on a 55 inch screen, I can gather no information, whatsoever, about this title.
David
You are on the Home Theater Forum. Have you read the mission statement?
 

Ruz-El

Fake Shemp
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
12,539
Location
Deadmonton
Real Name
Russell
I only have a 32" to watch this on, but I'm sending it back to Amazon anyways. I pre-ordered based on price and thinking it HAD to be better then the DVD. I don;t like supporting garbage, so it gets returned.
 

Brian Husar

Supporting Actor
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
533
Russell G said:
I only have a 32" to watch this on, but I'm sending it back to Amazon anyways. I pre-ordered based on price and thinking it HAD to be better then the DVD. I don;t like supporting garbage, so it gets returned.
I have a 45 inch and i'm always able to tell if it's garbage...so I really don't buy the smaller screen thing...cause i'm able to see it, maybe I am looking too hard . Like I said if it was not for the fact that the DVD is not a 16x9 transfer I would be sending this back and dealing with my DVD..but the DVD is not a 16x9 transfer. This needs to be recalled.
 

Ruz-El

Fake Shemp
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
12,539
Location
Deadmonton
Real Name
Russell
Originally Posted by Brian Husar /t/321398/a-few-words-about-the-color-of-money-in-blu-ray/30#post_3937348
I have a 45 inch and i'm always able to tell if it's garbage...so I really don't buy the smaller screen thing...cause i'm able to see it, maybe I am looking too hard . Like I said if it was not for the fact that the DVD is not a 16x9 transfer I would be sending this back and dealing with my DVD..but the DVD is not a 16x9 transfer. This needs to be recalled.

I agree completely. I also have a 28" in my bedroom that's the most unforgiving TV as far as transfers go. A bad transfer is a bad transfer.

Hopefully this isn't indicative of streamlining the physical product to be like the streaming. I watched my first streaming HD film a couple weeks ago, "Cowboys Versus Aliens". I'm sure the provider of the content is a huge factor and in my case, the cable companies version looks like shit. I've seen better presented SD DVDs and regular HD telecasts.
 

Hank E

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
190
Brian Husar said:
I have a 45 inch and i'm always able to tell if it's garbage...so I really don't buy the smaller screen thing...cause i'm able to see it, maybe I am looking too hard . Like I said if it was not for the fact that the DVD is not a 16x9 transfer I would be sending this back and dealing with my DVD..but the DVD is not a 16x9 transfer. This needs to be recalled.
Which DVD are you talking about? The one I have is 16x9.
 

Brian Husar

Supporting Actor
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
533
Hank E said:
Which DVD are you talking about? The one I have is 16x9.
My DVD says 16x9 on the back of the cover, "widescreen (1.85)-Enhanced for 16x9 Televisions". But the DVD is a 4:3 transfer, letterboxed but 4:3. I was shocked when I got it and it said that. I bought it in 2003.
 

Mark-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
6,503
Location
Camas, WA
Real Name
Mark Probst
Yep, it's a misprint (or outright fraud). The only DVD that has ever been issued in region 1 is letterboxed 4X3.
Brian Husar said:
My DVD says 16x9 on the back of the cover, "widescreen (1.85)-Enhanced for 16x9 Televisions". But the DVD is a 4:3 transfer, letterboxed but 4:3. I was shocked when I got it and it said that. I bought it in 2003.
 

Alan Tully

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
4,640
Location
London
Real Name
Alan
I'm not surprised at the zero score. I looked at the DVD/Blu-ray comparison over at caps-a-holic. The DVD is so soft & the Blu looks just as soft, but with the contrast jacked up a bit. The shocking thing is that this is not an obscure film from an unknown label, it's a Disney release of a Scorsese film staring Paul Newman & Tom Cruise! It does make you appreciate the good looking stuff.
 

Brian Husar

Supporting Actor
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
533
Mark-P said:
Yep, it's a misprint (or outright fraud). The only DVD that has ever been issued in region 1 is letterboxed 4X3.
There's a few Touchstone films that are like that. Spike Lee's He Got Game and Summer Of Same are 4:3 and letterboxed, but they do not say 16x9 on the back either.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,016
Messages
5,128,469
Members
144,241
Latest member
acinstallation449
Recent bookmarks
0
Top