1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

UHD Review A few words about...™ Terminator 2 -- in 4k UHD Blu-ray

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Robert Harris, Dec 21, 2017.

  1. Message #1 of 71 Dec 21, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2018
    Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    11,363
    Likes Received:
    11,017
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Robert Harris

    A few words about...™ Terminator 2 -- in 4k UHD Blu-ray
    [​IMG]


    Terminator 2, directed by James Cameron is a Carolco film, which may, or may not, have something to do with what I’m seeing.

    An important film for fans, and something that should be important to the overall lay of 4k turf.

    Problem is, whether by design or error, and it really doesn’t matter which, the Lionsgate release is in some ways the 2017 version of the original Patton Blu-ray, and has no reason to exist on 4k media.

    Any original film grain is gone. The image is slightly sharpened, made all the more obvious by 4k, and any highly resolved information that might have been on the original work, is gone.

    The overall aura is one of being slightly plasticized.

    Not nearly as problematic as Patton 1, but the same idea.

    This is a pity, as it’s an entertaining film.

    What crossed my mind, was that this may be the same old HD master used for the DVDs and older Blu-rays, but I have trouble believing that.

    Image - 2

    Audio - 5

    4k - 2

    Pass / Fail - Fail

    Upgrade from Blu-ray - No

    RAH
     
    Osato, Peter Keller, PMF and 4 others like this.
  2. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    12,384
    Likes Received:
    12,752
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    It's a new master that was created with the intention of being the basis of a 3D conversion. The grain was eliminated with the apparent goal of having a better 3D presentation, and was done with the enthusiastic participation of director James Cameron.

    However, I've seen absolutely nothing to indicate that this master was ever intended by Cameron to be used for anything other than a 3D conversion.

    It seems that this would not be the appropriate master to use for a UHD release.
     
    PMF likes this.
  3. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    11,363
    Likes Received:
    11,017
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Why would there be a need, or desire, to reduce grain toward 3D exhibition. Problem is that there isn’t 4k information in the image.

    That said, this master would probably be a superb basis for a DVD, or lower rez streaming.
     
    Stephen_J_H, PMF and Craig_Ehr like this.
  4. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    12,384
    Likes Received:
    12,752
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    You'd have to ask Cameron that. I don't think he was ever a big grain fan in the first place, so it could be part of a revisionist desire to make it look more "modern".
     
  5. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,204
    Likes Received:
    243
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Glad I cancelled months ago after the first alarming reports. To release such crap in UHD is mind boggling.
     
  6. Konstantinos

    Konstantinos Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,839
    Likes Received:
    966
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Konstantinos
    I'm glad Mr. Harris that you don't support this release!
    It's a shame such a highly popular film gets a bluray like this, and other unknown B-movies get wonderful filmic restorations!

    it seems the 2015 release is the "definite" for now release, although by no means I mean it's great!
     
    PMF likes this.
  7. Scott Merryfield

    Scott Merryfield Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 1998
    Messages:
    13,595
    Likes Received:
    1,914
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Thanks for the review, Robert. Your observations are similar to others on the 'net, so I decided to cancel my pre-order. Hopefully the next UHD release of this film will correct the issues.
     
    PMF likes this.
  8. Message #8 of 71 Dec 22, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2017
    Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    11,363
    Likes Received:
    11,017
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    One gets into some interesting turf, if & when a filmmaker chooses to modify their work - if that’s what has occurred here.

    Does a filmmaker have the aesthetic right to modify their work?

    Yes.

    Does the audience have to like, or approve of such modification?

    No.

    I’m generally for originality. Others may not be.

    Possibly, a dual release - original & modified.

    Again — if that’s the case here, and I have no direct information telling me that it is.
     
    Peter Keller, PMF and SAhmed like this.
  9. UHDvision

    UHDvision Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Real Name:
    David
    Thanks Robert, it also crossed my mind that the weird plastic look might be due to the scan being the old 2002 scan only "improved" and upscaled. Nonetheless, despite the kinks, this new version beats all past releases.
     
  10. Lord Dalek

    Lord Dalek Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    1,007
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Joel Henderson
    This being better than the previous transfers is less of a commentary on the alleged 4k scan and more on how deeply awful the other ones were.
     
  11. atcolomb

    atcolomb Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    Chicago Area
    Real Name:
    Angelo
    Lets see what happens when the first 3 Star Wars films or THX 1138 gets released in 4K. Like to see both original or modified as a option.
     
    PMF likes this.
  12. Dave H

    Dave H Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2000
    Messages:
    5,660
    Likes Received:
    268
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    I thought I read a new 4K scan was done for 3D. As bad as the DNR is, there is a lot more detail, different color, and different framing pointing to a new scan. However, I'll probably just stick with the 2015 Lionsgate BD as I prefer films to look like film and the BD even with its flaws comes closer to that.
     
  13. Ryan Barrett

    Ryan Barrett Agent

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Real Name:
    Ryan Barrett
    I read elsewhere that there was "fake grain" added back in to make the picture look more like...well, "film." Isn't the point of a restoration to make "X" look as close to original as possible? I can't believe (if it is the case) that Cameron signed off on this nonsense...I've read accounts of flaws, "private parts," and a number of other items digitally removed...hell, I saw screencaps elsewhere that the "purple looking" lasers during the opening have been changed to blue? What an absolute travesty. I do not understand why this film, arguably one of the greatest action films of all time, no matter what format...laserdisc, DVD, bluray, and now 4K continues to receive subpar releases on home video. Disappointment doesn't even begin to describe my feelings on this release.
     
    dpippel likes this.
  14. revgen

    revgen Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,208
    Likes Received:
    920
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Southern California
    Real Name:
    Dan
    It's easier for the conversion company (Stereo D) to convert the 2-D image to 3-D by eliminating the film grain. However, normally artificial grain is added back into the image to make it look less like plastic and more like film like they did with Titanic 3-D. This didn't happen on the T2 master for some reason. The T2 3-D conversion was done on a smaller budget than Titanic, so that may explain why.

    Lionsgate and StudioCanal should have went back to the original 4k scan before grain removal was performed for the 3-D conversion. I'm sure Cameron has that original scan stored somewhere.
     
  15. Camper

    Camper Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    Florida
    Real Name:
    david dennis
    I sold my 2015 Blu-ray when this was announced so I will have to watch this release till a better one comes along. It's only $13.79 at B&N and that's rock bottom for a new UHD release.
     
  16. Scott Merryfield

    Scott Merryfield Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 1998
    Messages:
    13,595
    Likes Received:
    1,914
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    I sold my SkyNet version, but still cancelled this order. I don't care how inexpensive it is -- I'd rather not have a de-grained, overly plastic-looking film on my shelf, because I will never want to watch it. I cancelled my order of the first BD release of Spartacus for the same reason, but I did own the first BD release of Patton, and it wasn't pretty.

    I'm okay with getting rid of the SkyNet version despite this. That release had to be the most poorly authored BD I ever owned. It took forever to load. I would get annoyed whenever I put it in a player. I can wait for a better version to be released -- we all know this will not be the last T2 released.
     
    SAhmed likes this.
  17. David Wilkins

    David Wilkins Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2001
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Thanks for your review, Mr. Harris. Saved by the bell...er, the review.
     
    PMF and Craig_Ehr like this.
  18. PMF

    PMF Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    2,917
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Philip
    Maybe this will end up being like "The French Connection"; as it wasn't too long before Friedkin's modifications disc was replaced by the audience's favored and original version.
     
  19. ScottJH

    ScottJH Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2001
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    95
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Real Name:
    Scott
    I did the same as well. I figured the 1080p disc that will be included is the 2015 one. Do we know if that is not the case?
     
  20. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    7,437
    Likes Received:
    1,686
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    I watched this tonight and must admit I was more bothered by the change in colors than the "degraining".

    Yeah, the image does have that "plastic" look to a degree, but not as badly as with the Skynet BD or some of the other usual DNR culprits.

    The colors are really different than in the past, though. The movie always leaned blue, but it had other hues as well - and now they're GONE.

    When I flipped between the 4K and the 2015 BD, I was shocked at just how different the colors looked - and having seen "T2" on 87-skillion different formats over the last 26 years, I'm pretty sure the "old colors" were correct...
     

Share This Page