Just some thoughts on it once I've watched it. Not a real review.Will you be offering an official review, Matt (of TGIF)?
Or maybe an unofficial one?!
Just some thoughts on it once I've watched it. Not a real review.Will you be offering an official review, Matt (of TGIF)?
Or maybe an unofficial one?!
Except for the fact that it is licensed FROM Sony which is very particular about how their masters are handled by licensees.TGIF is from Mill Creek, so I wouldn't get my hopes up for much more than "watchable" in the quality area.
Nope. See post #98.I am now thinking the red face error was always a part of the film. It looks like John got caught in a red gel fill light. In the next closeup, Olivia's hair does the same thing. Also, the face has more of an orange cast than the background.
Here’s what I noticed checking the old Blu-ray. For whatever reason rhe colors on the walls were completely different colors between the long shots and closeups. The red above the window was red in the long shot but faded to skin color in the closeups. For the new edition they noticed this bad color continuity and decided to fix it by digitally painting the walls in the closeups to match the long shots and some of that digital paint got on Travolta’s face.I disagree. You can see the red streaks in the old version as well.
A spectacularly good 4K release with Dolby Vision really adding to the pep rally and drive-in scenes - the ultra- black skies made these night scenes more realistic than I have ever seen before from a video or film presentation.
A spectacularly good 4K release with Dolby Vision really adding to the pep rally and drive-in scenes - the ultra- black skies made these night scenes more realistic than I have ever seen before from a video or film presentation.
My only complaint ( which I have made before ) is that few studios seem to know how to chapter-stop musicals. Don't start song chapters with 5 minutes of set-up of scenes leading into the songs ; at most give us two or three lines of set-up that lead into the songs. I can't be the only musical fan that often slips in a disc just to watch two or three of my favorite numbers. (Funny Girl is one disc that gets this right.)
Well, I finally ended up buying the 4K/UHD release at Target for $16.14 as Cartwheel had a special on it combined with the usual 5% off. Also, I redeemed my digital code twice, once on Vudu and the second time on iTunes and both showed up as 4K/HDR.Guess what? I didn't buy that package. I must have forgot to do so as I checked today and only bought the 50s and 60s packages. Now I'm debating whether to buy the 4K from iTunes for $9.99 since I'm not a big fan of Grease.
Watch this YouTube clip of the 40th Anniversary restoration:
At the 25 second mark, watch for this (look at John Travolta's forehead):
This is the same spot on the original Blu-ray:
I might not have noticed it happen while watching the 40th Anniversary Blu. But now that I've seen it, I can't unsee it.
Robert (or someone), please check the actual 4K disc to see if it's still there. Perhaps Paramount caught it and fixed it before the new discs got pressed?
Beyond that, the color timing of those two versions is AMAZINGLY different. I wonder which one is most loyal to the original appearance?
Mark
I must admit that I went into watching this transfer with high expectations and pre-conceived ideas about how it was going to look, so given all the praise from others, I do feel guilty that I'm either being unfairly critical or misguided!
I'm not yet UHD equipped so can 'only' watch the bluray version, but I found that some of the color grading was so 'odd' at times (unnatural grass/foliage color, unnatural sky color, color saturation pushed to unnatural extremes, inconsistent colors between shots, blue push on some shots) that it kept on taking me out of the film, and sadly, I've come away disappointed.
Some of the comments that I've read say that the UHD version has a more muted (I'm assuming acceptable) color palette than the Bluray, but wouldn't the Director/colorist have been able (and wanted) to achieve the same look for each? Does anyone know whether color grading is now done just once for the UHD version of a film, and for some color mapping software to automatically take care of the Bluray (in this case not as well as hoped for)?
I do get the impression that with the advent of digital grading tools, there is more temptation to 'fiddle' and more risk of not getting things quite right. Or is grading an OCN scan much harder than that from a positive for some reason? I guess what I'm finding hard to understand is why, in many years of film watching through the photochemical timing era (which I'm assuming was quite a crude tool?), I've never been taken out of a film by this kind of issue. Am I alone in seeing this kind of thing with some digitally graded films from this era, as here?
I mentioned that above on 21st June!FYI, Paramount has corrected the red band of color on Travolta's forehead in more recent pressing(s) of the 4K disc. I read about it on one of the forums (forget which)
Mark