"Penultimate"? Isn't that scene quite far from the end of the film?and second, in the penultimate "As God is my witness, I'll never be hungry again!" sequence, Vivien Leigh's face is so dark you cannot make out her expressions. Indeed, you can barely see the spectral highlights in her eyes.
I agree. I watched the Blu-ray disc a few weeks ago and made a firm decision: in future I will start the disc at the ball scene where we meet Rhett Butler for the first time, and I'll switch off after Ward Bond's scene. For me, between those points it's a damn good film but either side: yawnsville!If only the second half was as good as the first half, then it really would be a classic. I haven't looked at it for years, but worth keeping the Blu-ray for all the extras, that's if you have the earlier release, before Warner removed all the extras.
At the end the silhouette of Scarlett is wearing a hat looking at down at Tara, were as all the other time she isn't, so the end shot couldn't be taken from anywhere previous unless it was an outtake they left in for the original print. Also at the end the camera zooms out so it doesn't matter if we can see the silhouette or not before the scene fades to black.But the restoration team said that shots with text were recomposited. That is one of the shots, but I didn't know if they just lifted it like the other shots or repositioned the title on the frame. If the shot originally had more of the tree at the top, then the way it is now, THE END would have been in the bottom 1/3 of the frame.
There would normally be an international background, and multiple language overlays used in the production of the matrices.In 1954, they took the original shot and moved it up one sprocket hole, cropping the top of the final shot. I was wondering if the text was originally higher up on the tree.
Was an aesthetic mess but made oodles of money which helped MGM keep going for a few more years.When MGM reissued GWTW in 1961 to commemorate the Centennial of the Civil War, did they use the "widescreen" version from 1954 or the original 1.37:1 version? I think the first time I saw the movie was in the blown up 70mm version in 1967 which we all know now was an esthetic catastrophe, but for someone like me who hadn't seen it before, didn't know any better.