You are so damned stubborn.Clearly. I'm glad other people are enjoying it. I just don't care.
(However, I'm very excited to get A Star is Born next week.)
Btw when you finally see it I predict you will love it and regret not seeing it now.
You are so damned stubborn.Clearly. I'm glad other people are enjoying it. I just don't care.
(However, I'm very excited to get A Star is Born next week.)
Clearly. I'm glad other people are enjoying it. I just don't care.
(However, I'm very excited to get A Star is Born next week.)
Tino, you've got to ease Mr. Lipson into these things; and by that I mean really, really gradual-like.You are so damned stubborn.
Btw when you finally see it I predict you will love it and regret not seeing it now.
The general public wasn't buying into 3D do to several hurdles, studios weren't "forcing" people to ditch 3D and go 4K. People didn't WANT 3D at home to the level many had hope so it naturally was killed off. No secret agenda by anyone. The consumers spoke and that was it.
And I'm sure in relation to all at home viewers, 3D people are quite a small number overall now. And shrinking if their TV's are dying off.
Wal*Mart sold out of their 4K discs (& Blu-Rays) for BH on Tuesday - I came back on Wednesday (for something else) and they had re-stocked some of the blu-rays - They had plenty of DVDs ...The "general public" isnt buying into 4k discs either. The Forbes article reports that 4K discs are only a 5.3% marketplace percentage. That's lower than 3D at its height. Of course, a big title on a week-by-week can hit a high-teens pctg, but bigger 3D live-action titles had mid-20s to even an over 30% marketshare. Yet the industry called it failure. At CES back in 2016, WB exec Ron Sanders mentioned that Warner research indicated UHD is much larger than the home 3D market and that it’s most certainly not a niche product.
Uh-huh.
mea culpa: I made a mistake in my post here - possibly to due to an astigmatism that makes a capital H & R look similar ...I'm still trying to figure out why some posters here and in another forum keep referring to Bohemian Rhapsody as "BH" and not "BR"...
I'm still trying to figure out why some posters here and in another forum keep referring to Bohemian Rhapsody as "BH" and not "BR"...
Because there's an "H" in Bohemian; and an "H" in Rhapsody; and another "H" in UHD.I'm still trying to figure out why some posters here and in another forum keep referring to Bohemian Rhapsody as "BH" and not "BR"...
Now that it is available for rental, I am contemplating seeing 'Bohemian Rhapsody'. The problem is, I'm not really a fan of Queen's music. I don't hate their music, but I wouldn't go out of my way to listen to it.
Frankly, my hesitation in watching the film is my concern that I'll despise it. And if I despise it and it wins Best Picture, then I'll despise the Academy voters.
Our ability to properly reproduce color and audio will most assuredly make further "advances," especially with 8k on the horizon, but I'm not seeing any necessity to raise our current technical specifications, as the human eyes and ears are reasonably well tapped out.
Disagree. I think it has a great chance.And it has ZERO chance of winning Best Picture
Key word Of course is “me.”So we're stuck with horrible HDR, which prevents me from enjoying any 4K disc
Anything associated with Bryan Singer is not going to be rewarded in the current climate.Disagree. I think it has a great chance.
Nope. Rami is the favorite to win best actor. Also BR will win a few technical awards too.Anything associated with Bryan Singer is not going to be rewarded in the current climate.
He'll win and it will probably take the sound awards. I meant I can't see it winning Best Picture.Nope. Rami is the favorite to win best actor. Also BR will win a few technical awards too.