1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

UHD Review A few words about...™ Avengers Endgame -- in 4k UHD Blu-ray

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Robert Harris, Sep 11, 2019.

  1. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    12,277
    Likes Received:
    14,591
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Avengers Endgame is one of those Marvel Universe films, that seemed to do rather well theatrically.

    A bit complex, especially if one doesn't know the Marvel players and everything they've ever done, but entertaining nonetheless.

    As a 4k Blu-ray, it's a quality affair, even as up-rezzed from the 2k files. It's just fine.

    What isn't, fortunately only affects those who have:

    A. Not yet upgraded to 4k;

    B. Don't have Dolby Atmos.

    And that's the standard issue Blu-ray, which has been purposely crippled by removing the Dolby Atmos track.

    And for that reason, while I can recommend the 4k, I cannot recommend the Blu-ray, as it disallows the ability to future proof.

    One can choose to look at this from another perspective, which is that most theaters don't have Atmos, so it really doesn't matter.

    But one isn't suggesting the addition of an IMAX track here, and it's all doable.

    The problem seems to be purposefully giving those who don't buy 4k short shrift.


    Image – 5 (HDR 10 / Dolby Vision)

    Audio – 5 (Dolby Atmos)

    Pass / Fail – Pass

    Recommended

    RAH
     
    Stephen_J_H and Robin9 like this.
  2. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,832
    Likes Received:
    2,793
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Title says "Rambo" and review says "Endgame"! :eek:
     
  3. B-ROLL

    B-ROLL Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 26, 2016
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Bryan
    Is there that much of a difference ;)?
     
    Stephen_J_H likes this.
  4. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,832
    Likes Received:
    2,793
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Ooh - fighting words!
     
  5. B-ROLL

    B-ROLL Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 26, 2016
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Bryan
    [​IMG];)
     
  6. Wayne Klein

    Wayne Klein Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Could this have something to do with the amount of disc space that Atmos would consume on the BD?
     
  7. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,279
    Likes Received:
    19,088
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    It’s doubtful, as some studios include Atmos on the BD, and some used to that no longer do.

    The charitable reading of the situation is that Atmos can be slightly more difficult to author on the disc, and with the amount of people using Atmos at home being so small, that it was a lot of effort for something that people weren’t using.

    A less charitable reading would be that this is part of a push by certain studios to force the enthusiast crowd to purchase the more expensive product.
     
    Brian L likes this.
  8. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    43,428
    Likes Received:
    19,186
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    I'm more incline to believe that's the reasoning for the lack of Atmos by some studios.
     
    Brian L likes this.
  9. Keith Cobby

    Keith Cobby Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    1,459
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Kent "The Garden of England", UK
    Real Name:
    Keith Cobby
    I watched this over the weekend at a friends house. The disc is far from reference and looked quite muddy to me, probably due to the heavy CGI. John Wick 3, which is the other 4k I have seen recently, is much higher quality. 4k discs seem to have the same spectrum of quality as 1080p.
     
  10. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,279
    Likes Received:
    19,088
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    The Russos tend to favor that muddier look in their Marvel films. I always joke that it’s always a foggy day in the MCU when they’re at the helm.
     
  11. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    43,428
    Likes Received:
    19,186
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Correct, I think it's true to the source material.
     
    Josh Steinberg likes this.
  12. Keith Cobby

    Keith Cobby Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    1,459
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Kent "The Garden of England", UK
    Real Name:
    Keith Cobby
    The first half hour of Captain Marvel looked like it was shot through fog. Personally I don't feel engaged by a film when the image quality is so poor.
     
  13. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    43,428
    Likes Received:
    19,186
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    I feel engaged by the quality of the movie itself.
     
  14. Peter Neski

    Peter Neski Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    again ,the extras are lame ,
     
  15. Mike Frezon

    Mike Frezon Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2001
    Messages:
    51,062
    Likes Received:
    13,979
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Rensselaer, NY
    I gave up on superhero movies several years ago (especially the MCU).

    But...I've heard lots of good things about Endgame. Can it stand alone?

    Or should I watch Infinity Wars first?

    Or do I need to watch all 19,000 other Marvel films in order to understand what's going on?

    :D
     
  16. Scott Merryfield

    Scott Merryfield Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 1998
    Messages:
    14,947
    Likes Received:
    2,818
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    You need to watch Infinity Wars first. Endgame is basically part 2 of that film.
     
  17. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,279
    Likes Received:
    19,088
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    It works on several different levels.

    At its most basic, easily digestible level, Infinity War and Endgame is a two part story (or a single story told in two parts). One doesn’t really work without the other.

    But Endgame also works on an additional level, serving as a “series finale” of sorts to all of the MCU movies that have come before.

    You can probably enjoy Infinity War and Endgame as a two movie experience. While every nuance might not be apparent, you should have no trouble following the story being told onscreen. But it would mean more to you emotionally if you had the investment in all the other films.

    It’s sort of like when popular shows would do “very special episodes” that would attract audiences that didn’t watch the series regularly. Everyone can enjoy it but regular viewers will get more from it.
     

Share This Page