Winston T. Boogie
Senior HTF Member
Not true, I just posted it here. Which makes me not a source.Reggie W
Not true, I just posted it here. Which makes me not a source.Reggie W
Easy to guess why possible manipulation was used by the league to get Watson on the field- the league wants the QBs on the field, to the point of altering the rules so there’s a smaller chance of their getting injured. I don’t know how true it is that the ratings are affected by which QBs are playing, but we’ve been told this by the media. The league, if true about handing the judge selective cases, has given itself a black eye, but Goodell and the owners are too arrogant to admit to mistakes or wrongdoing.So, now we know why the suspension was so light, and it is pretty sad. The NFL was totally involved in this deal and here is how they did it. Instead of sending Ms. Robinson, the woman deciding the case, all of the info on what Watson had done, they sent over info on just 5 of the accusations. Not sure which 5 they were but she was not deciding the suspension based upon the 26 or so cases against him, nor looking at the evidence that he hired at least 66 different women in 17 months to "massage" him.
So, the suspension, at the NFL's own doing, is based upon 5 selected cases they chose for Robinson to look at to determine a punishment. Pathetic? Yes. Sneaky? Yes. Does the NFL look bad? Yes. Will they appeal? Who knows, they did it the way they did to hopefully land Watson the lightest possible punishment.
Well, that worked but it seems a bad idea to have done it that way.
Easy to guess why possible manipulation was used by the league to get Watson on the field- the league wants the QBs on the field, to the point of altering the rules so there’s a smaller chance of their getting injured. I don’t know how true it is that the ratings are affected by which QBs are playing, but we’ve been told this by the media. The league, if true about handing the judge selective cases, has given itself a black eye, but Goodell and the owners are too arrogant to admit to mistakes or wrongdoing.
The league can’t get away with having an attitude of “anything goes”. That would be a terrible look, and a damaging image problem. I do agree with your comment that a double standard exists (Kraft vs. Watson).I think it is far better for the league if the big name QBs play. The way they agreed to do these things now is with an outside arbiter which is why this woman was deciding the penalty. The NFL acts as the prosecutor and the NFLPA acts as the defense. In this case the "defense" said they would not challenge what the arbiter decides...ha and they should not because all he got was 6 games. It is a dream come true for the NFLPA. Brady got 4 games for balls supposedly being slightly deflated which he played worse with than the balls that were properly inflated. It is kind of a hilarious joke. Where is the common sense? If you get 4 games for playing with your balls and 6 games for molesting at least 30 women...how does that make sense?
I mean, I am not upset by this because, hey, kind of expect the league to do something ridiculous. If he plays, he plays. If he doesn't he doesn't. The women appear to have been paid off and there may be more payoffs.
I just think the league should be upfront and just say "We don't care what these guys do off the field and will rely on the law to punish them not us."
I mean Bob Kraft got caught going to a "massage" place for sex. No punishment and he was on video. The league said so what! So, why would they care what Watson did? He is just in the club. If you have the money, molest all the women you want and we will reward you with a quarter of a billion so you can molest more women. This is how it works.
That's what bothers me about these situations. Discipline in the NFL is so random and arbitrary. It would seem like this is a pretty serious situation involving dozens of women, but it's about the same level penalty as Brady's balls? As I'd noted previously, Roethlisberger got the same six-game penalty for allegedly assaulting two women. Watson is allegedly somewhere around 30.It is kind of a hilarious joke. Where is the common sense? If you get 4 games for playing with your balls and 6 games for molesting at least 30 women...how does that make sense?
The league can’t get away with having an attitude of “anything goes”. That would be a terrible look, and a damaging image problem. I do agree with your comment that a double standard exists (Kraft vs. Watson).
That's what bothers me about these situations. Discipline in the NFL is so random and arbitrary. It would seem like this is a pretty serious situation involving dozens of women, but it's about the same level penalty as Brady's balls? As I'd noted previously, Roethlisberger got the same six-game penalty for allegedly assaulting two women. Watson is allegedly somewhere around 30.
It just makes the arbiter look foolish once the decision is handed down, as the general public knows there were many more accusations. I'd think she would be upset that the NFL has made her look like an idiot in public.As I understand it the league presented 4 of the court filings and 1 case from the newspapers. So, that would be all the arbiter could or should consider. That person is deciding a labor issue at that point and if the league confines itself to 5 examples, she only should be looking at the 5 examples.
It just makes the arbiter look foolish once the decision is handed down, as the general public knows there were many more accusations. I'd think she would be upset that the NFL has made her look like an idiot in public.
Yes, but then female therapists would sue claiming gender discrimination, regardless of the possible ramifications on the other end.I think you solve it by just making all of Watson's massage people male. So, the massage thing is not about sex, it is about therapy.
Yes, but then female therapists would sue claiming gender discrimination, regardless of the possible ramifications on the other end.
Article at NBC News explaining how the NFL really doesn't want to suspend anyone, ever, but has been forced to do so by the modern social media PR machine:
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...s-deshaun-watson-six-games-nice-try-rcna41056
Yes, and I think the Browns will get a rude welcome (well, ruder than usual) in any away stadium. Recent news has seemed to indicate Browns fans have minimal issues with Watson based on a recent practice open to the public, but it'll give fans of other teams another reason to amp up the abuse on the Browns.I have to think the big winner in this whole thing is Mayfield. A guy a lot of people did not like or were annoyed with but now, I think more people will be cheering for him to destroy the Browns than ever cheered for him before. So, the boost he gets from this, plus getting off of that Browns team is huge. Hopefully, he learns something from it and becomes a better person and player.
Yes, and I think the Browns will get a rude welcome (well, ruder than usual) in any away stadium. Recent news has seemed to indicate Browns fans have minimal issues with Watson based on a recent practice open to the public, but it'll give fans of other teams another reason to amp up the abuse on the Browns.
Watson had better not stink- he and the Browns are going to be under enormous pressure to win immediately. It’s not going to be easy for him or the team- having to get past the Bengals and a Ravens team that’s going to be under pressure to improve, not to mention all the other good teams in the AFC.Well, lousy spot for a Browns fan to be. Best QB you have had in a long, long time and he is a serial sexual assault guy. If the Browns were good, basically Watson is the Darth Vader of the league. You can root against him all season long. Basically, it is hard to know at the moment what Watson will be as a player. He's been off for a while, but when he was playing he is a very talented player and if he plays at the level he could, the Browns should compete with the Bengals and Ravens. As it stands now, the Browns either finish third or last in their division this season, I think. The Steelers feel that Trubisky probably gives them a chance to contend. I don't know, but Trubisky is better than Ben was last year and the Steelers made the playoffs and really just a half game behind the Bengals. So, it is possible they contend if Trubisky can do what they think he can do. It will be a new offense for the Steelers and so we will see what happens.
So, assuming Watson steps on the field in game 7 against the Bengals, and their record at that point is not 0-6 or close to it...well, the Browns could make noise in the division, if Watson plays fantastic out of the gate.
After a home game in week 7 against the Bengals, he would go on the road to play Miami, then the Bills, both should be tough, and then come back home to face Brady and the Buccs. That could be an 0-4 start for Watson which may not have Browns fans cheering.
He then would go on the road to play his old team the Texans, stay on the road to play the Bengals again, and then finish out with home games against the Ravens and Saints. Looking at that, the only maybe easy win is the game at Houston, which may be emotional and hard for him. So, when Watson does hit the field this season, he could really stink it up.
Dolphins owner Ross has been suspended and fined, and the team forfeits next year’s first round pick, and 2024’s third round pick, due to improper talks between the team and Tom Brady, and Sean Payton.
Watson had better not stink- he and the Browns are going to be under enormous pressure to win immediately. It’s not going to be easy for him or the team- having to get past the Bengals and a Ravens team that’s going to be under pressure to improve, not to mention all the other good teams in the AFC.