It's not like they're missing good basketball play on the Knicks part.Off topic, but I can’t understand why people give their good money to Dolan by packing MSG to
watch his team. I say starve him out of ownership.
It's not like they're missing good basketball play on the Knicks part.Off topic, but I can’t understand why people give their good money to Dolan by packing MSG to
watch his team. I say starve him out of ownership.
I hope you guys don't regret that signing. I know there are some concerns about his shoulder.Phils sign Wheeler. 5 years, $118 million.
Yes I thought that was a big contract, considering his injury history. The Phils still need a good left handed starter (Hamels was the last good one they had, and he’s been gone more than 4 years).I hope you guys don't regret that signing. I know there are some concerns about his shoulder.
I thought (and still think) giving a pitcherWow, Strasburg signs back with the Nats for 7/245M. That tells me that Gerritt Cole's contract is going to be 9 years at more than 300M. Cole is more than 2 years younger than Strasburg.
Wow, Cole to Yankees for 9/324M! As a Yankee fan, I don't know how I feel about this huge contract. It's not going to end well if he doesn't opt out after his fifth year. Don't get me wrong, he's a great pitcher that I wanted the Yankees to sign, but damn it's 9 years for 324M.Wow, Strasburg signs back with the Nats for 7/245M. That tells me that Gerritt Cole's contract is going to be 9 years at more than 300M. Cole is more than 2 years younger than Strasburg.
Please, you would have those high fees whether the players were making all of this money or not. The one thing I know about very rich people/owners is that they always want to be richer. It's ironic how the majority of fans seem to favor the owners interest over the players when most of the players come from similar backgrounds and in some cases much worst. The hell with the players getting some of that money instead lets root for the owners getting that money and placing it in their own pockets.I'm not a fan of the huge contracts which it seems now always have to be bigger than the year before. Are Padres fans happy they got Machado last year? Are Phillies fans happy with Harper? Are all of you happy with higher ticket and concession and parking prices? ($25 to park? You could get preferred for $50. Or pay $5 at an off-site lot and walk two steep hills.)
Has any player not taken the largest offer they can get? Is that what it's just about?
I didn't really like how Cole acted after the WS loss so I felt skeptical about embracing him if the Dodgers had traded for him. I would not have wanted Cole to go to the Angels, because the Dodgers can't seem to beat them without him. (Although they have Rendon now!) What I really wish the Dodgers would do is fix the TV contract so that more than 50% of the area can even watch them on TV. I mean, if they aren't using that contract money to do big trades, what are they doing with it?
(Maybe Cole can teach the Yankees about sign stealing.)
Please, you would have those high fees whether the players were making all of this money or not.
Not when it comes to corporate greed. It's a trait that's there even more so today. Just look at what the NFL owners did to season ticket fans with those PSLs. Business owners will always try to push the envelope when it comes to ticket and concession prices because of supply and demand set by the fans and their willingness to pay for them. Most teams don't own parking fees and those prices have increased that has nothing to do with player salaries.Is that an assumption or is there data for that? It 's reasonable to assume there must be some correlation to that. Supply and demand suggests that if you sign a superstar player and fans want to see said player, the demand goes up along with the prices.
Just because I said "I'm not a fan of the huge contracts which it seems now always have to be bigger than the year before" doesn't mean I'm siding with the owners. I've seen very few of these mega-contracts that have been worth it. It benefits a select few players and it ups revenue for the owners in attendance and merchandising.
2019 data: Guess which teams have the highest and lowest average ticket prices:
Highest: Cubs - $128.00
Lowest: Mets - $37.00
https://www.statista.com/statistics/193673/average-ticket-price-in-the-mlb-by-team/
Yes the PSLs charged by the owners of the NFL teams is just another way to stick it to fans thatNot when it comes to corporate greed. It's a trait that's there even more so today. Just look at what the NFL owners did to season ticket fans with those PSLs. Business owners will always try to push the envelope when it comes to ticket and concession prices because of supply and demand set by the fans and their willingness to pay for them. Most teams don't own parking fees and those prices have increased that has nothing to do with player salaries.
@Osato Where is Osato? As a Mets fan, he should be ecstatic.
Wow- I’m surprised at the team with the lowest average ticket price. Not really surprised by the team with the highest prices.Is that an assumption or is there data for that? It 's reasonable to assume there must be some correlation to that. Supply and demand suggests that if you sign a superstar player and fans want to see said player, the demand goes up along with the prices.
Just because I said "I'm not a fan of the huge contracts which it seems now always have to be bigger than the year before" doesn't mean I'm siding with the owners. I've seen very few of these mega-contracts that have been worth it. It benefits a select few players and it ups revenue for the owners in attendance and merchandising.
2019 data: Guess which teams have the highest and lowest average ticket prices:
Highest: Cubs - $128.00
Lowest: Mets - $37.00
https://www.statista.com/statistics/193673/average-ticket-price-in-the-mlb-by-team/